linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@pengutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx: add Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-IO board (pcm032)
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:12:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090303081212.GL5367@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa40903012033x6b6a76d6j7218d076f2c6ad3d@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 09:33:16PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Would it be easier to get Pengutronix to release a new u-boot for
> > the pcm030? I'm using U-Boot 1.2.0-mpc5200b-tiny-2 (Apr 17 2007 -
> > 11:49:20).
>
> Only if it is a chip IO setup problem (like port_config or clock
> setup). Otherwise the kernel should be setting up the PCI controller
> correctly. Regardless, I don't think the kernel should be crashing
> when PCI is in a funny state.

Ack; I didn't follow the thread in detail, but if possible I'd like to
avoid bootloader updates; it's quite a lot of effort because there are
thousends of devices in the field, not to mention the whole
qualification mechanics at Phytec.

Wolfram can check the issue when being back in the office.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-03  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25 15:32 [PATCH] powerpc/mpc52xx: add Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-IO board (pcm032) Wolfram Sang
2009-02-25 15:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2009-02-27  5:31 ` Grant Likely
2009-03-01 10:18   ` Wolfram Sang
2009-03-01 14:48     ` Grant Likely
2009-03-01 15:54       ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-01 22:47         ` Grant Likely
2009-03-02  0:37           ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-02  0:46             ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-02  1:07               ` Grant Likely
2009-03-02  2:15                 ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-02  2:19                   ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-02  4:33                     ` Grant Likely
2009-03-03  8:12                       ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2009-03-07  2:01                         ` Jon Smirl
2009-03-10 16:03       ` [PATCH v2] " Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090303081212.GL5367@pengutronix.de \
    --to=r.schwebel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=wsa@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).