From: Richard Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] ppc/pnv: create bus sensitive PEs
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 03:49:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120801074941.GA10239@richard.(null)> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340639001-28152-2-git-send-email-shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:43:14PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
>Basically, there're 2 types of PCI bus sensitive PEs: (A) The PE
>includes single PCI bus. (B) The PE includes the PCI bus and all
>the subordinate PCI buses. At present, we'd like to put PCI bus
>originated by PCI-e link to form PE that contains single PCI bus,
>and the PCIe-to-PCI bridge will form the 2nd type of PE. We don't
>figure out to detect PLX bridge yet. Once we can detect PLX bridge
>some day, we have to put PCI buses originated from the downstream
>port of PLX bridge to the 2nd type of PE.
>
>The patch changes the original implementation for a little bit
>to support 2 types of PCI bus sensitive PEs described as above.
>Also, the function used to retrieve the corresponding PE according
>to the given PCI device has been changed based on that because each
>PCI device should trace the directly associated PE.
>
>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
>Reviewed-by: Richard Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 10 +--
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>index fbdd74d..1504795 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_free_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb, int pe)
> * but in the meantime, we need to protect them to avoid warnings
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>-static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit __pnv_ioda_get_one_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
>+static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit pnv_ioda_get_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>@@ -560,19 +560,6 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit __pnv_ioda_get_one_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return NULL;
> return &phb->ioda.pe_array[pdn->pe_number];
> }
>-
>-static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit pnv_ioda_get_pe(struct pci_dev *dev)
>-{
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = __pnv_ioda_get_one_pe(dev);
>-
>- while (!pe && dev->bus->self) {
>- dev = dev->bus->self;
>- pe = __pnv_ioda_get_one_pe(dev);
>- if (pe)
>- pe = pe->bus_pe;
>- }
>- return pe;
>-}
> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>
> static int __devinit pnv_ioda_configure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
>@@ -589,7 +576,11 @@ static int __devinit pnv_ioda_configure_pe(struct pnv_phb *phb,
> dcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_DEVICE_NUMBER;
> fcomp = OPAL_IGNORE_RID_FUNCTION_NUMBER;
> parent = pe->pbus->self;
>- count = pe->pbus->subordinate - pe->pbus->secondary + 1;
>+ if (pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL)
>+ count = pe->pbus->subordinate - pe->pbus->secondary + 1;
>+ else
>+ count = 1;
>+
> switch(count) {
> case 1: bcomp = OpalPciBusAll; break;
> case 2: bcomp = OpalPciBus7Bits; break;
>@@ -699,6 +690,7 @@ static unsigned int pnv_ioda_dma_weight(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return 10;
> }
>
>+#if 0
> static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE(struct pci_dev *dev)
> {
> struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
>@@ -767,6 +759,7 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe * __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> return pe;
> }
>+#endif /* Useful for SRIOV case */
>
> static void pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> {
>@@ -784,43 +777,47 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe)
> pdn->pcidev = dev;
> pdn->pe_number = pe->pe_number;
> pe->dma_weight += pnv_ioda_dma_weight(dev);
>- if (dev->subordinate)
>+ if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL) && dev->subordinate)
> pnv_ioda_setup_same_PE(dev->subordinate, pe);
> }
> }
>
>-static void __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_dev *dev,
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *ppe)
>+/*
>+ * There're 2 types of PCI bus sensitive PEs: One that is compromised of
>+ * single PCI bus. Another one that contains the primary PCI bus and its
>+ * subordinate PCI devices and buses. The second type of PE is normally
>+ * orgiriated by PCIe-to-PCI bridge or PLX switch downstream ports.
>+ */
>+static void __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_bus *bus, int all)
> {
>- struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
> struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>- struct pci_bus *bus = dev->subordinate;
> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
> int pe_num;
>
>- if (!bus) {
>- pr_warning("%s: Bridge without a subordinate bus !\n",
>- pci_name(dev));
>- return;
>- }
> pe_num = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb);
> if (pe_num == IODA_INVALID_PE) {
>- pr_warning("%s: Not enough PE# available, disabling bus\n",
>- pci_name(dev));
>+ pr_warning("%s: Not enough PE# available for PCI bus %04x:%02x\n",
>+ __func__, pci_domain_nr(bus), bus->number);
> return;
> }
>
> pe = &phb->ioda.pe_array[pe_num];
>- ppe->bus_pe = pe;
>+ pe->flags = (all ? PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL : PNV_IODA_PE_BUS);
> pe->pbus = bus;
>+ pe->pe_number = pe_num;
Gavin,
Sorry for the late reply. I am not sure I a replying on the latest code. If
not, please point me out.
I think we don't need to add this line. the pe->pe_number is already set in
pnv_ioda_alloc_pe().
> pe->pdev = NULL;
> pe->tce32_seg = -1;
> pe->mve_number = -1;
> pe->rid = bus->secondary << 8;
> pe->dma_weight = 0;
>
>- pe_info(pe, "Secondary busses %d..%d associated with PE\n",
>- bus->secondary, bus->subordinate);
>+ if (all)
>+ pe_info(pe, "Secondary busses %d..%d associated with PE#%d\n",
>+ bus->secondary, bus->subordinate, pe_num);
>+ else
>+ pe_info(pe, "Secondary busses %d associated with PE#%d\n",
>+ bus->secondary, pe_num);
>
> if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
> /* XXX What do we do here ? */
>@@ -848,17 +845,33 @@ static void __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(struct pci_dev *dev,
> static void __devinit pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(struct pci_bus *bus)
> {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
>+
>+ pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(bus, 0);
>
> list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>- pe = pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE(dev);
>- if (pe == NULL)
>- continue;
>- /* Leaving the PCIe domain ... single PE# */
>- if (dev->pcie_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)
>- pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(dev, pe);
>- else if (dev->subordinate)
>- pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(dev->subordinate);
>+ if (dev->subordinate) {
>+ if (dev->pcie_type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCI_BRIDGE)
>+ pnv_ioda_setup_bus_PE(dev->subordinate, 1);
>+ else
>+ pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(dev->subordinate);
>+ }
>+ }
>+}
>+
>+/*
>+ * Configure PEs so that the downstream PCI buses and devices
>+ * could have their associated PE#. Unfortunately, we didn't
>+ * figure out the way to identify the PLX bridge yet. So we
>+ * simply put the PCI bus and the subordinate behind the root
>+ * port to PE# here. The game rule here is expected to be changed
>+ * as soon as we can detected PLX bridge correctly.
>+ */
>+static void __devinit pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
>+{
>+ struct pci_controller *hose, *tmp;
>+
>+ list_for_each_entry_safe(hose, tmp, &hose_list, list_node) {
>+ pnv_ioda_setup_PEs(hose->bus);
> }
> }
>
>@@ -1139,6 +1152,11 @@ static void __devinit pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
> }
> }
>
>+static void __devinit pnv_pci_ioda_fixup(void)
>+{
>+ pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs();
>+}
>+
> /* Prevent enabling devices for which we couldn't properly
> * assign a PE
> */
>@@ -1305,6 +1323,7 @@ void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda1_phb(struct device_node *np)
> * ourselves here
> */
> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb = pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_phb;
>+ ppc_md.pcibios_fixup = pnv_pci_ioda_fixup;
> ppc_md.pcibios_enable_device_hook = pnv_pci_enable_device_hook;
> pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY | PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC);
>
>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>index 8bc4796..0cb760c 100644
>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
>@@ -17,9 +17,14 @@ enum pnv_phb_model {
> };
>
> #define PNV_PCI_DIAG_BUF_SIZE 4096
>+#define PNV_IODA_PE_DEV (1 << 0) /* PE has single PCI device */
>+#define PNV_IODA_PE_BUS (1 << 1) /* PE has primary PCI bus */
>+#define PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL (1 << 2) /* PE has subordinate buses */
>
> /* Data associated with a PE, including IOMMU tracking etc.. */
> struct pnv_ioda_pe {
>+ unsigned long flags;
>+
> /* A PE can be associated with a single device or an
> * entire bus (& children). In the former case, pdev
> * is populated, in the later case, pbus is.
>@@ -40,11 +45,6 @@ struct pnv_ioda_pe {
> */
> unsigned int dma_weight;
>
>- /* This is a PCI-E -> PCI-X bridge, this points to the
>- * corresponding bus PE
>- */
>- struct pnv_ioda_pe *bus_pe;
>-
> /* "Base" iommu table, ie, 4K TCEs, 32-bit DMA */
> int tce32_seg;
> int tce32_segcount;
>--
>1.7.9.5
>
>_______________________________________________
>Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-01 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 15:43 [PATCH V3 0/8] ppc/pnv: Rework on pnv P7IOC initialization Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/8] ppc/pnv: create bus sensitive PEs Gavin Shan
2012-08-01 7:49 ` Richard Yang [this message]
2012-08-01 8:26 ` Gavin Shan
2012-08-01 9:04 ` Richard Yang
2012-08-01 9:18 ` Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 2/8] ppc/pnv: PE list based on creation order Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/8] ppc/pnv: I/O and MMIO resource assignment for PEs Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 4/8] ppc/pnv: initialize DMA " Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 5/8] ppc/pnv: skip check on PE if necessary Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 6/8] ppc/pnv: fix overrunning segment tracing array Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 7/8] ppc/pnv: using PCI core to do resource assignment Gavin Shan
2012-06-25 15:43 ` [PATCH 8/8] ppc/pnv: remove unused functions Gavin Shan
2012-08-20 13:49 [PATCH V4 0/8] Rework on PowerNV P7IOC initialization Gavin Shan
2012-08-20 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/8] ppc/pnv: create bus sensitive PEs Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20120801074941.GA10239@richard.(null)' \
--to=weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).