linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@au1.ibm.com>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc: Flush SLB/TLBs if we get SLB/TLB machine check errors on power7.
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:58:15 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130808045815.GD12112@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807093855.5389.21377.stgit@mars.in.ibm.com>

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:08:55PM +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> If we get a machine check exception due to SLB or TLB errors, then flush
> SLBs/TLBs and reload SLBs to recover. We do this in real mode before turning
> on MMU. Otherwise we would run into nested machine checks.
> 
> If we get a machine check when we are in guest, then just flush the
> SLBs and continue. This patch handles errors for power7. The next
> patch will handle errors for power8

I don't see anywhere in this patch or the next where we check whether
we are in fact running in hypervisor mode.  It is possible for us to
get machine check interrupts to the 0x200 vector when running under a
hypervisor, for example if the hypervisor doesn't support the FWNMI
facility (e.g. KVM) or if it does but we haven't done the
ibm,nmi-register call yet.

If we're not in hypervisor mode we should probably not do any of this
new stuff, but just handle it like we always have.

Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08  4:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-07  9:37 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Machine check handling in linux host Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Split the common exception prolog logic into two section Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08  4:10   ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-08-08  4:16     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-07  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] powerpc: handle machine check in Linux host Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08  4:51   ` Paul Mackerras
2013-08-08 13:19     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 13:33       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-08  5:01   ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-08-07  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Introduce a early machine check hook in cpu_spec Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] powerpc: Add flush_tlb operation " Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07  9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc: Flush SLB/TLBs if we get SLB/TLB machine check errors on power7 Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08  4:58   ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2013-08-07  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] powerpc: Flush SLB/TLBs if we get SLB/TLB machine check errors on power8 Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Decode and save machine check event Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 18:41   ` Scott Wood
2013-08-08  3:40     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08  5:14   ` Paul Mackerras
2013-08-08 13:19     ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 13:33       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-07  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] powerpc/powernv: Remove machine check handling in OPAL Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07  9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] powerpc/powernv: Machine check exception handling Mahesh J Salgaonkar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130808045815.GD12112@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=jeremy.kerr@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).