From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@au1.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Decode and save machine check event.
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 15:14:22 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130808051422.GE12112@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807093913.5389.80206.stgit@mars.in.ibm.com>
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 03:09:13PM +0530, Mahesh J Salgaonkar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Now that we handle machine check in linux, the MCE decoding should also
> take place in linux host. This info is crucial to log before we go down
> in case we can not handle the machine check errors. This patch decodes
> and populates a machine check event which contain high level meaning full
> MCE information.
A couple of things worry me about this patch:
First, there is the fact that we can only do get_mce_event() once for
a given machine check. You call it in kvmppc_realmode_mc_power7(),
which is fine, but if it is not something we recognize and can handle
we will proceed to exit the guest and jump to machine_check_fwnmi,
which will then proceed to machine_check_common() and then
opal_machine_check(), where you have added another call to
get_mce_event(), which will probably underflow your little per-cpu
stack of machine check events.
Secondly, we shouldn't call save_mce_event() if we're not in
hypervisor mode, since per-cpu variables are not in general accessible
in real mode when running under a hypervisor with a limited real-mode
area (RMA).
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-08 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 9:37 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Machine check handling in linux host Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Split the common exception prolog logic into two section Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 4:10 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-08-08 4:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-07 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] powerpc: handle machine check in Linux host Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 4:51 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-08-08 13:19 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 13:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-08 5:01 ` Anshuman Khandual
2013-08-07 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Introduce a early machine check hook in cpu_spec Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] powerpc: Add flush_tlb operation " Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 9:38 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] powerpc: Flush SLB/TLBs if we get SLB/TLB machine check errors on power7 Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 4:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2013-08-07 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] powerpc: Flush SLB/TLBs if we get SLB/TLB machine check errors on power8 Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Decode and save machine check event Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 18:41 ` Scott Wood
2013-08-08 3:40 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 5:14 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2013-08-08 13:19 ` Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar
2013-08-08 13:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-07 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] powerpc/powernv: Remove machine check handling in OPAL Mahesh J Salgaonkar
2013-08-07 9:39 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] powerpc/powernv: Machine check exception handling Mahesh J Salgaonkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130808051422.GE12112@iris.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=jeremy.kerr@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).