From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, anton@samba.org,
paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] powerpc: Support to replay PMIs
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:07:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160801180716.5d0a47de@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469991989-28409-11-git-send-email-maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 00:36:28 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Code to replay the Performance Monitoring Interrupts(PMI).
> In the masked_interrupt handler, for PMIs we reset the MSR[EE]
> and return. This is due the fact that PMIs are level triggered.
> In the __check_irq_replay(), we enabled the MSR[EE] which will
> fire the interrupt for us.
>
> Patch also adds a new arch_local_irq_disable_var() variant. New
> variant takes an input value to write to the paca->soft_enabled.
> This will be used in following patch to implement the tri-state
> value for soft-enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> index a7b86edc94bf..9f235d25b9f8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -84,6 +84,20 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_disable(void)
> return flags;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned long soft_irq_set_level(int value)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags, zero;
> +
> + asm volatile(
> + "li %1,%3; lbz %0,%2(13); stb %1,%2(13)"
> + : "=r" (flags), "=&r" (zero)
> + : "i" (offsetof(struct paca_struct, soft_enabled)),\
> + "i" (value)
> + : "memory");
> +
> + return flags;
> +}
> +
> extern void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long);
>
> static inline void arch_local_irq_enable(void)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> index 857e1e8188e5..9d70e51db8bc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -158,9 +158,16 @@ notrace unsigned int __check_irq_replay(void)
> if ((happened & PACA_IRQ_DEC) || decrementer_check_overflow())
> return 0x900;
>
> + /*
> + * In masked_handler() for PMI, we disable MSR[EE] and return.
> + * When replaying it, just enabling the MSR[EE] will do
> + * trick, since the PMI are "level" triggered.
> + */
> + local_paca->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_PMI;
> +
> /* Finally check if an external interrupt happened */
> local_paca->irq_happened &= ~PACA_IRQ_EE;
> - if (happened & PACA_IRQ_EE)
> + if ((happened & PACA_IRQ_EE) || (happened & PACA_IRQ_PMI))
> return 0x500;
This will replay hardware_interrupt_common in the case we got a PMI
interrupt but no EE.
Should we just follow the normal pattern here, return 0xf00 for PMI,
and replay the same as the other cases?
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-01 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-31 19:06 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] powerpc: "paca->soft_enabled" based local atomic operation implementation Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] Add #defs for paca->soft_enabled flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] Cleanup to use IRQ_DISABLE_LEVEL_* macros for paca->soft_enabled update Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] powerpc: move set_soft_enabled() Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] powerpc: Use set_soft_enabled api to update paca->soft_enabled Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] powerpc: reverse the soft_enable logic Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] powerpc: Avoid using EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro in MASKABLE_* Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] powerpc: Add new _EXCEPTION_PROLOG_1 macro Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] powerpc: Add "mask_lvl" paramater to MASKABLE_* macros Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-01 5:21 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-01 5:49 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] powerpc: Add support to mask perf interrupts Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-01 5:29 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-01 6:09 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-01 6:48 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] powerpc: Support to replay PMIs Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-01 8:07 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2016-08-01 8:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-08-01 10:22 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2016-08-01 10:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-01 8:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2016-07-31 19:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] powerpc: rewrite local_t using soft_irq Madhavan Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160801180716.5d0a47de@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).