From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 15:52:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211145217.GE15609@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211134909.GA107845@gmail.com>
On Mon 11-02-19 14:49:09, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu 24-01-19 11:10:50, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 1/24/19 6:17 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > and nr_cpus set to 4. The underlying reason is tha the device is bound
> > > > to node 2 which doesn't have any memory and init_cpu_to_node only
> > > > initializes memory-less nodes for possible cpus which nr_cpus restrics.
> > > > This in turn means that proper zonelists are not allocated and the page
> > > > allocator blows up.
> > >
> > > This looks OK to me.
> > >
> > > Could we add a few DEBUG_VM checks that *look* for these invalid
> > > zonelists? Or, would our existing list debugging have caught this?
> >
> > Currently we simply blow up because those zonelists are NULL. I do not
> > think we have a way to check whether an existing zonelist is actually
> > _correct_ other thatn check it for NULL. But what would we do in the
> > later case?
> >
> > > Basically, is this bug also a sign that we need better debugging around
> > > this?
> >
> > My earlier patch had a debugging printk to display the zonelists and
> > that might be worthwhile I guess. Basically something like this
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 2e097f336126..c30d59f803fb 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -5259,6 +5259,11 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> >
> > build_zonelists_in_node_order(pgdat, node_order, nr_nodes);
> > build_thisnode_zonelists(pgdat);
> > +
> > + pr_info("node[%d] zonelist: ", pgdat->node_id);
> > + for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, &pgdat->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK], MAX_NR_ZONES-1)
> > + pr_cont("%d:%s ", zone_to_nid(zone), zone->name);
> > + pr_cont("\n");
> > }
>
> Looks like this patch fell through the cracks - any update on this?
I was waiting for some feedback. As there were no complains about the
above debugging output I will make it a separate patch and post both
patches later this week. I just have to go through my backlog pile after
vacation.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-14 8:24 [RFC PATCH] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes Michal Hocko
2019-01-14 10:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-14 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-15 5:32 ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-24 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 17:51 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-25 10:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 19:25 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-24 19:10 ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-25 10:50 ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-11 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-02-11 14:52 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211145217.GE15609@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).