* [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface
@ 2019-08-21 8:13 Vasant Hegde
2019-08-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/powernv: Add new opal message type Vasant Hegde
2019-08-22 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Oliver O'Halloran
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vasant Hegde @ 2019-08-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Vasant Hegde, Jeremy Kerr, Mahesh Salgaonkar
Use "opal-msg-size" device tree property to allocate memory for "opal_msg".
Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changes in v3:
- Call BUG_ON, if we fail to allocate memory during init.
-Vasant
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
index aba443be7daa..4f1f68f568bf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(opal_write_lock);
static struct atomic_notifier_head opal_msg_notifier_head[OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX];
static uint32_t opal_heartbeat;
static struct task_struct *kopald_tsk;
+static struct opal_msg *opal_msg;
+static uint64_t opal_msg_size;
void opal_configure_cores(void)
{
@@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type, void *msg)
static void opal_handle_message(void)
{
s64 ret;
- /*
- * TODO: pre-allocate a message buffer depending on opal-msg-size
- * value in /proc/device-tree.
- */
- static struct opal_msg msg;
u32 type;
- ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(&msg), sizeof(msg));
+ ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(opal_msg), opal_msg_size);
/* No opal message pending. */
if (ret == OPAL_RESOURCE)
return;
@@ -290,14 +287,14 @@ static void opal_handle_message(void)
return;
}
- type = be32_to_cpu(msg.msg_type);
+ type = be32_to_cpu(opal_msg->msg_type);
/* Sanity check */
if (type >= OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
pr_warn_once("%s: Unknown message type: %u\n", __func__, type);
return;
}
- opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)&msg);
+ opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)opal_msg);
}
static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
@@ -306,9 +303,21 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-static int __init opal_message_init(void)
+static int __init opal_message_init(struct device_node *opal_node)
{
int ret, i, irq;
+ const __be32 *val;
+
+ val = of_get_property(opal_node, "opal-msg-size", NULL);
+ if (val)
+ opal_msg_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
+
+ /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
+ if (!opal_msg_size)
+ opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
+
+ opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
for (i = 0; i < OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX; i++)
ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&opal_msg_notifier_head[i]);
@@ -910,7 +919,7 @@ static int __init opal_init(void)
}
/* Initialise OPAL messaging system */
- opal_message_init();
+ opal_message_init(opal_node);
/* Initialise OPAL asynchronous completion interface */
opal_async_comp_init();
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/powernv: Add new opal message type
2019-08-21 8:13 [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Vasant Hegde
@ 2019-08-21 8:13 ` Vasant Hegde
2019-08-22 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Oliver O'Halloran
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vasant Hegde @ 2019-08-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Vasant Hegde, Jeremy Kerr
We have OPAL_MSG_PRD message type to pass prd related messages from OPAL
to `opal-prd`. It can handle messages upto 64 bytes. We have a requirement
to send bigger than 64 bytes of data from OPAL to `opal-prd`. Lets add new
message type (OPAL_MSG_PRD2) to pass bigger data.
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-prd.c | 9 ++++++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
index 383242eb0dea..1cad413e1e0e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h
@@ -453,6 +453,7 @@ enum opal_msg_type {
OPAL_MSG_DPO = 5,
OPAL_MSG_PRD = 6,
OPAL_MSG_OCC = 7,
+ OPAL_MSG_PRD2 = 8,
OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX,
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-prd.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-prd.c
index e072bf157d62..50a735d77192 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-prd.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-prd.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static int opal_prd_msg_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
int msg_size, item_size;
unsigned long flags;
- if (msg_type != OPAL_MSG_PRD)
+ if (msg_type != OPAL_MSG_PRD && msg_type != OPAL_MSG_PRD2)
return 0;
/* Calculate total size of the message and item we need to store. The
@@ -393,6 +393,13 @@ static int opal_prd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return rc;
}
+ rc = opal_message_notifier_register(OPAL_MSG_PRD2, &opal_prd_event_nb);
+ if (rc) {
+ pr_err("%s: Couldn't register event notifier (%d)\n",
+ __func__, OPAL_MSG_PRD2);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
rc = misc_register(&opal_prd_dev);
if (rc) {
pr_err("failed to register miscdev\n");
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface
2019-08-21 8:13 [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Vasant Hegde
2019-08-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/powernv: Add new opal message type Vasant Hegde
@ 2019-08-22 5:51 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2019-08-22 15:36 ` Vasant Hegde
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oliver O'Halloran @ 2019-08-22 5:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vasant Hegde, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar, Jeremy Kerr
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:43 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> Use "opal-msg-size" device tree property to allocate memory for "opal_msg".
>
> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Call BUG_ON, if we fail to allocate memory during init.
>
> -Vasant
>
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> index aba443be7daa..4f1f68f568bf 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(opal_write_lock);
> static struct atomic_notifier_head opal_msg_notifier_head[OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX];
> static uint32_t opal_heartbeat;
> static struct task_struct *kopald_tsk;
> +static struct opal_msg *opal_msg;
> +static uint64_t opal_msg_size;
>
> void opal_configure_cores(void)
> {
> @@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type, void *msg)
> static void opal_handle_message(void)
> {
> s64 ret;
> - /*
> - * TODO: pre-allocate a message buffer depending on opal-msg-size
> - * value in /proc/device-tree.
> - */
> - static struct opal_msg msg;
> u32 type;
>
> - ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(&msg), sizeof(msg));
> + ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(opal_msg), opal_msg_size);
> /* No opal message pending. */
> if (ret == OPAL_RESOURCE)
> return;
> @@ -290,14 +287,14 @@ static void opal_handle_message(void)
> return;
> }
>
> - type = be32_to_cpu(msg.msg_type);
> + type = be32_to_cpu(opal_msg->msg_type);
>
> /* Sanity check */
> if (type >= OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
> pr_warn_once("%s: Unknown message type: %u\n", __func__, type);
> return;
> }
> - opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)&msg);
> + opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)opal_msg);
> }
>
> static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
> @@ -306,9 +303,21 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static int __init opal_message_init(void)
> +static int __init opal_message_init(struct device_node *opal_node)
> {
> int ret, i, irq;
> + const __be32 *val;
> +
> + val = of_get_property(opal_node, "opal-msg-size", NULL);
> + if (val)
> + opal_msg_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
Use of_property_read_u32()
> +
> + /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
> + if (!opal_msg_size)
> + opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
> +
> + opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
Seems questionable. Why not fall back to using a staticly allocated
struct opal_msg? Or re-try the allocation with the size limited to
sizeof(struct opal_msg)?
> for (i = 0; i < OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX; i++)
> ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&opal_msg_notifier_head[i]);
> @@ -910,7 +919,7 @@ static int __init opal_init(void)
> }
>
> /* Initialise OPAL messaging system */
> - opal_message_init();
> + opal_message_init(opal_node);
>
> /* Initialise OPAL asynchronous completion interface */
> opal_async_comp_init();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface
2019-08-22 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Oliver O'Halloran
@ 2019-08-22 15:36 ` Vasant Hegde
2019-08-23 4:10 ` Vasant Hegde
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vasant Hegde @ 2019-08-22 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver O'Halloran, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar, Jeremy Kerr
On 8/22/19 11:21 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:43 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>> Use "opal-msg-size" device tree property to allocate memory for "opal_msg".
>>
>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Call BUG_ON, if we fail to allocate memory during init.
>>
>> -Vasant
>>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> index aba443be7daa..4f1f68f568bf 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(opal_write_lock);
>> static struct atomic_notifier_head opal_msg_notifier_head[OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX];
>> static uint32_t opal_heartbeat;
>> static struct task_struct *kopald_tsk;
>> +static struct opal_msg *opal_msg;
>> +static uint64_t opal_msg_size;
>>
>> void opal_configure_cores(void)
>> {
>> @@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type, void *msg)
>> static void opal_handle_message(void)
>> {
>> s64 ret;
>> - /*
>> - * TODO: pre-allocate a message buffer depending on opal-msg-size
>> - * value in /proc/device-tree.
>> - */
>> - static struct opal_msg msg;
>> u32 type;
>>
>> - ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(&msg), sizeof(msg));
>> + ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(opal_msg), opal_msg_size);
>> /* No opal message pending. */
>> if (ret == OPAL_RESOURCE)
>> return;
>> @@ -290,14 +287,14 @@ static void opal_handle_message(void)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - type = be32_to_cpu(msg.msg_type);
>> + type = be32_to_cpu(opal_msg->msg_type);
>>
>> /* Sanity check */
>> if (type >= OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
>> pr_warn_once("%s: Unknown message type: %u\n", __func__, type);
>> return;
>> }
>> - opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)&msg);
>> + opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)opal_msg);
>> }
>>
>> static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>> @@ -306,9 +303,21 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> }
>>
>> -static int __init opal_message_init(void)
>> +static int __init opal_message_init(struct device_node *opal_node)
>> {
>> int ret, i, irq;
>
>> + const __be32 *val;
>> +
>> + val = of_get_property(opal_node, "opal-msg-size", NULL);
>> + if (val)
>> + opal_msg_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
>
> Use of_property_read_u32()
Yes. Will fix it.
>
>> +
>> + /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
>> + if (!opal_msg_size)
>> + opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
>> +
>> + opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>
>> + BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
>
> Seems questionable. Why not fall back to using a staticly allocated
> struct opal_msg? Or re-try the allocation with the size limited to
> sizeof(struct opal_msg)?
If we are not able to allocate memory during init then we have bigger problem.
No point in continuing. Hence added BUG_ON().
May be I can retry allocation with fixed size before calling BUG_ON().
How about something like below :
+ /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
+ if (!opal_msg_size)
+ opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
+
+ opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!opal_msg) {
+ opal_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct opal_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
+ BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
+ }
-Vasant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface
2019-08-22 15:36 ` Vasant Hegde
@ 2019-08-23 4:10 ` Vasant Hegde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vasant Hegde @ 2019-08-23 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver O'Halloran, linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar, Jeremy Kerr
On 8/22/19 9:06 PM, Vasant Hegde wrote:
> On 8/22/19 11:21 AM, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
>> On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 13:43 +0530, Vasant Hegde wrote:
>>> Use "opal-msg-size" device tree property to allocate memory for "opal_msg".
>>>
>>> Cc: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vasant Hegde <hegdevasant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - Call BUG_ON, if we fail to allocate memory during init.
>>>
>>> -Vasant
>>>
>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>>> index aba443be7daa..4f1f68f568bf 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal.c
>>> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(opal_write_lock);
>>> static struct atomic_notifier_head opal_msg_notifier_head[OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX];
>>> static uint32_t opal_heartbeat;
>>> static struct task_struct *kopald_tsk;
>>> +static struct opal_msg *opal_msg;
>>> +static uint64_t opal_msg_size;
>>> void opal_configure_cores(void)
>>> {
>>> @@ -271,14 +273,9 @@ static void opal_message_do_notify(uint32_t msg_type,
>>> void *msg)
>>> static void opal_handle_message(void)
>>> {
>>> s64 ret;
>>> - /*
>>> - * TODO: pre-allocate a message buffer depending on opal-msg-size
>>> - * value in /proc/device-tree.
>>> - */
>>> - static struct opal_msg msg;
>>> u32 type;
>>> - ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(&msg), sizeof(msg));
>>> + ret = opal_get_msg(__pa(opal_msg), opal_msg_size);
>>> /* No opal message pending. */
>>> if (ret == OPAL_RESOURCE)
>>> return;
>>> @@ -290,14 +287,14 @@ static void opal_handle_message(void)
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> - type = be32_to_cpu(msg.msg_type);
>>> + type = be32_to_cpu(opal_msg->msg_type);
>>> /* Sanity check */
>>> if (type >= OPAL_MSG_TYPE_MAX) {
>>> pr_warn_once("%s: Unknown message type: %u\n", __func__, type);
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> - opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)&msg);
>>> + opal_message_do_notify(type, (void *)opal_msg);
>>> }
>>> static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>>> @@ -306,9 +303,21 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_message_notify(int irq, void *data)
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>> -static int __init opal_message_init(void)
>>> +static int __init opal_message_init(struct device_node *opal_node)
>>> {
>>> int ret, i, irq;
>>
>>> + const __be32 *val;
>>> +
>>> + val = of_get_property(opal_node, "opal-msg-size", NULL);
>>> + if (val)
>>> + opal_msg_size = be32_to_cpup(val);
>>
>> Use of_property_read_u32()
>
> Yes. Will fix it.
>
>>
>>> +
>>> + /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
>>> + if (!opal_msg_size)
>>> + opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
>>> +
>>> + opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>>> + BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
>>
>> Seems questionable. Why not fall back to using a staticly allocated
>> struct opal_msg? Or re-try the allocation with the size limited to
>> sizeof(struct opal_msg)?
>
> If we are not able to allocate memory during init then we have bigger problem.
> No point in continuing. Hence added BUG_ON().
> May be I can retry allocation with fixed size before calling BUG_ON().
> How about something like below :
>
> + /* If opal-msg-size property is not available then use default size */
> + if (!opal_msg_size)
> + opal_msg_size = sizeof(struct opal_msg);
> +
> + opal_msg = kmalloc(opal_msg_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!opal_msg) {
Just to be clear I will adjust `opal_msg_size` size here.
-Vasant
> + opal_msg = kmalloc(sizeof(struct opal_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> + BUG_ON(opal_msg == NULL);
> + }
>
>
> -Vasant
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-23 4:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-21 8:13 [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Vasant Hegde
2019-08-21 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc/powernv: Add new opal message type Vasant Hegde
2019-08-22 5:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] powerpc/powernv: Enhance opal message read interface Oliver O'Halloran
2019-08-22 15:36 ` Vasant Hegde
2019-08-23 4:10 ` Vasant Hegde
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).