linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/9] namei: LOOKUP_NO_XDEV: block mountpoint crossing
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:43:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114054348.GH26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114044945.ldedzjrb4s7i7irr@yavin.dot.cyphar.com>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:49:45PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2019-11-13, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:05:47PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -862,6 +870,8 @@ static int nd_jump_root(struct nameidata *nd)
> > >  void nd_jump_link(struct path *path)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct nameidata *nd = current->nameidata;
> > > +
> > > +	nd->last_magiclink.same_mnt = (nd->path.mnt == path->mnt);
> > >  	path_put(&nd->path);
> > >  
> > >  	nd->path = *path;
> > > @@ -1082,6 +1092,10 @@ const char *get_link(struct nameidata *nd)
> > >  		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_MAGICLINK_JUMPED) {
> > >  			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS))
> > >  				return ERR_PTR(-ELOOP);
> > > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_XDEV)) {
> > > +				if (!nd->last_magiclink.same_mnt)
> > > +					return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
> > > +			}
> > >  		}
> > 
> > Ugh...  Wouldn't it be better to take that logics (some equivalent thereof)
> > into nd_jump_link()?  Or just have nd_jump_link() return an error...
> 
> This could be done, but the reason for stashing it away in
> last_magiclink is because of the future magic-link re-opening patches
> which can't be implemented like that without putting the open_flags
> inside nameidata (which was decided to be too ugly a while ago).
> 
> My point being that I could implement it this way for this series, but
> I'd have to implement something like last_magiclink when I end up
> re-posting the magic-link stuff in a few weeks.
> 
> Looking at all the nd_jump_link() users, the other option is to just
> disallow magic-link crossings entirely for LOOKUP_NO_XDEV. The only
> thing allowing them permits is to resolve file descriptors that are
> pointing to the same procfs mount -- and it's unclear to me how useful
> that really is (apparmorfs and nsfs will always give -EXDEV because
> aafs_mnt and nsfs_mnt are internal kernel vfsmounts).

I would rather keep the entire if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_MAGICLINK_JUMPED)
out of the get_link().  If you want to generate some error if
nd_jump_link() has been called, just do it right there.  The fewer
pieces of state need to be carried around, the better...

And as for opening them...  Why would you need full open_flags in there?
Details, please...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>, Chanho Min <chanho.min@lge.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/9] namei: LOOKUP_NO_XDEV: block mountpoint crossing
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 05:43:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191114054348.GH26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191114054348.iYdrj8AOvMArrPqGK1ZK5hP6UUTcCAfuSIIP2kyEJMI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191114044945.ldedzjrb4s7i7irr@yavin.dot.cyphar.com>

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:49:45PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2019-11-13, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:05:47PM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > 
> > > @@ -862,6 +870,8 @@ static int nd_jump_root(struct nameidata *nd)
> > >  void nd_jump_link(struct path *path)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct nameidata *nd = current->nameidata;
> > > +
> > > +	nd->last_magiclink.same_mnt = (nd->path.mnt == path->mnt);
> > >  	path_put(&nd->path);
> > >  
> > >  	nd->path = *path;
> > > @@ -1082,6 +1092,10 @@ const char *get_link(struct nameidata *nd)
> > >  		if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_MAGICLINK_JUMPED) {
> > >  			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS))
> > >  				return ERR_PTR(-ELOOP);
> > > +			if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_NO_XDEV)) {
> > > +				if (!nd->last_magiclink.same_mnt)
> > > +					return ERR_PTR(-EXDEV);
> > > +			}
> > >  		}
> > 
> > Ugh...  Wouldn't it be better to take that logics (some equivalent thereof)
> > into nd_jump_link()?  Or just have nd_jump_link() return an error...
> 
> This could be done, but the reason for stashing it away in
> last_magiclink is because of the future magic-link re-opening patches
> which can't be implemented like that without putting the open_flags
> inside nameidata (which was decided to be too ugly a while ago).
> 
> My point being that I could implement it this way for this series, but
> I'd have to implement something like last_magiclink when I end up
> re-posting the magic-link stuff in a few weeks.
> 
> Looking at all the nd_jump_link() users, the other option is to just
> disallow magic-link crossings entirely for LOOKUP_NO_XDEV. The only
> thing allowing them permits is to resolve file descriptors that are
> pointing to the same procfs mount -- and it's unclear to me how useful
> that really is (apparmorfs and nsfs will always give -EXDEV because
> aafs_mnt and nsfs_mnt are internal kernel vfsmounts).

I would rather keep the entire if (nd->flags & LOOKUP_MAGICLINK_JUMPED)
out of the get_link().  If you want to generate some error if
nd_jump_link() has been called, just do it right there.  The fewer
pieces of state need to be carried around, the better...

And as for opening them...  Why would you need full open_flags in there?
Details, please...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-14  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05  9:05 [PATCH v15 0/9] open: introduce openat2(2) syscall Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 1/9] namei: LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS: block symlink resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 2/9] namei: LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS: block magic-link resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  1:24   ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  1:24     ` Al Viro
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 3/9] namei: LOOKUP_NO_XDEV: block mountpoint crossing Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  1:36   ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  1:36     ` Al Viro
2019-11-14  4:49     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-14  4:49       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-14  5:43       ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-11-14  5:43         ` Al Viro
2019-11-14 13:33         ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-14 13:33           ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 4/9] namei: LOOKUP_BENEATH: O_BENEATH-like scoped resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  1:55   ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  1:55     ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  7:47     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  7:47       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-14  4:57       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-14  4:57         ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 5/9] namei: LOOKUP_IN_ROOT: chroot-like " Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:03   ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:03     ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:44     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:44       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:59       ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:59         ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  3:55         ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  3:55           ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 6/9] namei: LOOKUP_{IN_ROOT, BENEATH}: permit limited ".." resolution Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:09   ` [PATCH v15 6/9] namei: LOOKUP_{IN_ROOT,BENEATH}: " Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:09     ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  7:52     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  7:52       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 7/9] open: introduce openat2(2) syscall Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:29   ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:29     ` Al Viro
2019-11-13  2:35     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  2:35       ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 8/9] selftests: add openat2(2) selftests Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-05  9:05 ` [PATCH v15 9/9] Documentation: path-lookup: mention LOOKUP_MAGICLINK_JUMPED Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-11 13:24 ` [PATCH v15 0/9] open: introduce openat2(2) syscall Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-12 23:01   ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 23:01     ` Kees Cook
2019-11-12 23:06     ` Christian Brauner
2019-11-12 23:06       ` Christian Brauner
2019-11-13  0:46     ` Aleksa Sarai
2019-11-13  0:46       ` Aleksa Sarai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191114054348.GH26530@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=asarai@suse.de \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chanho.min@lge.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=christian@brauner.io \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=drysdale@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).