[PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Fix CPU idle to be called with IRQs disabled

* [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Fix CPU idle to be called with IRQs disabled
@ 2019-10-22 11:58 Nicholas Piggin
  2019-10-30 12:16 ` Michael Ellerman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicholas Piggin @ 2019-10-22 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Paul Mackerras, Nicholas Piggin

Commit e78a7614f3876 ("idle: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from
disrupting offline") changes arch_cpu_idle_dead to be called with
interrupts disabled, which triggers the WARN in pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self.

Fix this by fixing up irq_happened after hard disabling, rather than
requiring there are no pending interrupts, similarly to what was done
done until commit 2525db04d1cc5 ("powerpc/powernv: Simplify lazy IRQ
handling in CPU offline").

Fixes: e78a7614f3876 ("idle: Prevent late-arriving interrupts from disrupting offline")
Reported-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
index fbd6e6b7bbf2..241cfee744d9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/smp.c
@@ -146,6 +146,18 @@ static int pnv_smp_cpu_disable(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void pnv_flush_interrupts(void)
+{
+	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
+		if (xive_enabled())
+			xive_flush_interrupt();
+		else
+			icp_opal_flush_interrupt();
+	} else {
+		icp_native_flush_interrupt();
+	}
+}
+
 static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu;
@@ -153,13 +165,6 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 	u64 lpcr_val;
 
 	/* Standard hot unplug procedure */
-	/*
-	 * This hard disables local interurpts, ensuring we have no lazy
-	 * irqs pending.
-	 */
-	WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
-	hard_irq_disable();
-	WARN_ON(lazy_irq_pending());
 
 	idle_task_exit();
 	current->active_mm = NULL; /* for sanity */
@@ -172,6 +177,26 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 	if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S))
 		wmask = SRR1_WAKEMASK_P8;
 
+	/*
+	 * This turns the irq soft-disabled state we're called with, into a
+	 * hard-disabled state with pending irq_happened interrupts cleared.
+	 *
+	 * PACA_IRQ_DEC   - Decrementer should be ignored.
+	 * PACA_IRQ_HMI   - Can be ignored, processing is done in real mode.
+	 * PACA_IRQ_DBELL, EE, PMI - Unexpected.
+	 */
+	hard_irq_disable();
+	if (generic_check_cpu_restart(cpu))
+		goto out;
+	if (local_paca->irq_happened &
+			(PACA_IRQ_DBELL | PACA_IRQ_EE | PACA_IRQ_PMI)) {
+		if (local_paca->irq_happened & PACA_IRQ_EE)
+			pnv_flush_interrupts();
+		DBG("CPU%d Unexpected exit while offline irq_happened=%lx!\n",
+				cpu, local_paca->irq_happened);
+	}
+	local_paca->irq_happened = PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS;
+
 	/*
 	 * We don't want to take decrementer interrupts while we are
 	 * offline, so clear LPCR:PECE1. We keep PECE2 (and
@@ -197,6 +222,7 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 
 		srr1 = pnv_cpu_offline(cpu);
 
+		WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
 		WARN_ON(lazy_irq_pending());
 
 		/*
@@ -212,13 +238,7 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 		 */
 		if (((srr1 & wmask) == SRR1_WAKEEE) ||
 		    ((srr1 & wmask) == SRR1_WAKEHVI)) {
-			if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300)) {
-				if (xive_enabled())
-					xive_flush_interrupt();
-				else
-					icp_opal_flush_interrupt();
-			} else
-				icp_native_flush_interrupt();
+			pnv_flush_interrupts();
 		} else if ((srr1 & wmask) == SRR1_WAKEHDBELL) {
 			unsigned long msg = PPC_DBELL_TYPE(PPC_DBELL_SERVER);
 			asm volatile(PPC_MSGCLR(%0) : : "r" (msg));
@@ -266,7 +286,7 @@ static void pnv_smp_cpu_kill_self(void)
 	 */
 	lpcr_val = mfspr(SPRN_LPCR) | (u64)LPCR_PECE1;
 	pnv_program_cpu_hotplug_lpcr(cpu, lpcr_val);
-
+out:
 	DBG("CPU%d coming online...\n", cpu);
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread