* use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources
@ 2009-03-13 22:42 Mark Takatz
2009-03-15 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Takatz @ 2009-03-13 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Ben,
We're looking at the fixes you put in place for the various PCI errors
and we think this is the solution we need for our system, a GE Fanuc CM6
PPC board (single 8641), but your patches appear to apply either to
2.6.24 or 2.6.25, and we have 2.6.23. Do you know of any similar work
done on the 2.6.23 release?
Thanks in advance for any help you can provide,
--
Mark J. Takatz
Pericle Communications Company
1910 Vindicator Drive, Suite 100
Colorado Springs, CO 80919
Office: (719) 548-1170
Cell: (719) 287-5267
Fax: (719) 548-1211
takatz@pericle.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources
2009-03-13 22:42 use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources Mark Takatz
@ 2009-03-15 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-16 14:40 ` Mark Takatz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2009-03-15 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Takatz; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:42 -0600, Mark Takatz wrote:
> Ben,
>
> We're looking at the fixes you put in place for the various PCI errors
> and we think this is the solution we need for our system, a GE Fanuc CM6
> PPC board (single 8641), but your patches appear to apply either to
> 2.6.24 or 2.6.25, and we have 2.6.23. Do you know of any similar work
> done on the 2.6.23 release?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help you can provide,
No, you would have to backport major chunks of the PCI rework I did in
between, along with fixes I did after that. At this stage I would
recommend considering an update to 2.6.27 or 2.6.28.
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources
2009-03-15 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2009-03-16 14:40 ` Mark Takatz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Takatz @ 2009-03-16 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Robert Wuest
Hehe, and that opens up an entirely different can of worms with our board.
Thanks, however.
Mark
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 16:42 -0600, Mark Takatz wrote:
>
>> Ben,
>>
>> We're looking at the fixes you put in place for the various PCI errors
>> and we think this is the solution we need for our system, a GE Fanuc CM6
>> PPC board (single 8641), but your patches appear to apply either to
>> 2.6.24 or 2.6.25, and we have 2.6.23. Do you know of any similar work
>> done on the 2.6.23 release?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any help you can provide,
>>
>
> No, you would have to backport major chunks of the PCI rework I did in
> between, along with fixes I did after that. At this stage I would
> recommend considering an update to 2.6.27 or 2.6.28.
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>
>
>
--
Mark J. Takatz
Pericle Communications Company
1910 Vindicator Drive, Suite 100
Colorado Springs, CO 80919
Office: (719) 548-1170
Cell: (719) 287-5267
Fax: (719) 548-1211
takatz@pericle.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-16 14:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-13 22:42 use generic pci_assign_unassign_resources Mark Takatz
2009-03-15 23:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-16 14:40 ` Mark Takatz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).