From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: pr: move PR related tracepoints to a separate header
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:55:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52499EED.9080701@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bo3ab920.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 09/30/2013 05:53 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de> writes:
>
>> On 09/30/2013 02:57 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> Alexander Graf<agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
>>>>>>> index a088e9a..7d5a136 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/trace.h
>>>>>>> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kvm_ppc_instr,
>>>>>>> {41, "HV_PRIV"}
>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
>>>>>>> +/*
>>>>>>> + * For pr we define this in trace_pr.h since it pr can be built as
>>>>>>> + * a module
>>>>>> Not sure I understand the need. If the config option is available, so
>>>>>> should the struct field. Worst case that happens with HV is that we
>>>>>> get empty shadow_srr1 values in our trace, no?
>>>>> That is not the real reason. trace.h get built as part of kvm.ko or as
>>>>> part of kernel. These trace functions actually get called from
>>>>> kvm-pr.ko. To make they build i would either need EXPORT_SYMBOL or move
>>>>> the definition of them to kvm-pr.ko. I did the later and moved only pr
>>>>> related traces to kvm-pr.ko
>>>> I fail to see why we wouldn't have a trace_hv.h file then, as that can
>>>> also be built as a module, no? And at that point I don't see why we
>>>> would need any conditionals at all in trace.h anymore, as it would
>>>> only cover generic code.
>>> Currently HV module is not using any tracepoints. Once it start using
>>> tracepoints we would have trace_hv.h
>> So why would there be an #ifndef in trace.h?
>>
> to handle things like trace_kvm_exit in booke.c. For that we still don't
> have kernel module, and booke.c include trace.h.
Ah, so it's for booke! :)
Just move them to trace_booke.h then to clarify things.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-30 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 10:03 [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s hv: Fix vcore leak Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:39 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: remove kvmppc_handler_highmem label Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: move book3s_64_vio_hv.c into the main kernel binary Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add a new config variable CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:43 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operations Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add is_hv_enabled to kvmppc_ops Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:18 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:09 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 16:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 16:36 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: pr: move PR related tracepoints to a separate header Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:22 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 15:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 15:55 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:25 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] kvm: simplify processor compat check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:31 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 15:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-28 15:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 8:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29 15:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 15:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Allow the HV and PR selection per virtual machine Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Fix module ownership Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:16 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 13:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:54 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-10-01 11:36 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 11:43 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52499EED.9080701@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).