From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:27:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3hybh68.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9CCFAB0B-A05C-4C70-AA87-6339D1BA1471@suse.de>
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
> On 27.09.2013, at 15:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>> On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> index fd5b393..775d368 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c
>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>>> #include <asm/machdep.h>
>>>> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>>>> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Stray whitespace change
>>>
>>
>> will fix
>>
>>>> #include "trace_pr.h"
>>>>
>>>> #define PTE_SIZE 12
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> index b9841ad..20d03c2 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>> vcpu->arch.mmu.tlbie(vcpu, addr, large);
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR
>>>
>>> Why?
>>
>> If i have CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR=m #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR will
>> not work. There is a runtime check I can use IS_ENABLED(). But didn't
>> want to do those. Hence moved to the symbol which will be set as
>> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR = y
>
> Ah, I see. The naming starts to get really confusing. Could you please
> give this a slightly better name, such as
> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR_POSSIBLE or such, so that it's obvious that this
> #ifdef doesn't mean "option is enabled", but instead means "option can
> potentially be enabled through a module".
Will do
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-30 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-27 10:03 [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s hv: Fix vcore leak Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:39 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: remove kvmppc_handler_highmem label Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: move book3s_64_vio_hv.c into the main kernel binary Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add a new config variable CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_HV Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 11:43 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add kvmppc_ops callback for HV and PR specific operations Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 12:52 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Add is_hv_enabled to kvmppc_ops Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:18 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:03 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:09 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:56 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 16:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 16:36 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: pr: move PR related tracepoints to a separate header Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:22 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:06 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:02 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:51 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 15:53 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 15:55 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Support building HV and PR KVM as module Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:25 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:08 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:04 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 12:57 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] kvm: simplify processor compat check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 12:31 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-27 13:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 15:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-28 15:36 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 8:58 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-29 15:05 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-29 15:11 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Allow the HV and PR selection per virtual machine Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:03 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] kvm: powerpc: book3s: Fix module ownership Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-27 10:52 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 10:16 ` Alexander Graf
2013-09-30 13:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-09-30 14:54 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2013-10-01 11:36 ` Alexander Graf
2013-10-01 11:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-10-01 11:43 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k3hybh68.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).