[PATCH v2 0/7] memory-hotplug: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[PATCH v2 0/7] memory-hotplug: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This series of patches fix a problem when adding memory in bad manner.
For example: for a x86_64 machine booted with "mem=400M" and with 2GiB
memory installed, following commands cause problem:

  # echo 0x40000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
 [   28.613895] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x40000000-0x47ffffff]
  # echo 0x48000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe
 [   28.693675] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x48000000-0x4fffffff]
  # echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
  # echo 0x50000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe 
 [   29.084090] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x50000000-0x57ffffff]
  # echo 0x58000000 > /sys/devices/system/memory/probe 
 [   29.151880] init_memory_mapping: [mem 0x58000000-0x5fffffff]
  # echo online_movable > /sys/devices/system/memory/memory11/state
  # echo online> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory8/state
  # echo online> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory10/state
  # echo offline> /sys/devices/system/memory/memory9/state
 [   30.558819] Offlined Pages 32768
  # free
              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
 Mem:        780588 18014398509432020     830552          0          0      51180
 -/+ buffers/cache: 18014398509380840     881732
 Swap:            0          0          0

This is because the above commands probe higher memory after online a
section with online_movable, which causes ZONE_HIGHMEM (or ZONE_NORMAL
for systems without ZONE_HIGHMEM) overlaps ZONE_MOVABLE.

After the second online_movable, the problem can be observed from
zoneinfo:

 # cat /proc/zoneinfo
...
Node 0, zone  Movable
  pages free     65491
        min      250
        low      312
        high     375
        scanned  0
        spanned  18446744073709518848
        present  65536
        managed  65536
...

This series of patches solve the problem by checking ZONE_MOVABLE when
choosing zone for new memory. If new memory is inside or higher than
ZONE_MOVABLE, makes it go there instead.

After applying this series of patches, following are free and zoneinfo
result (after offlining memory9):

bash-4.2# free
              total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
 Mem:        780956      80112     700844          0          0      51180
 -/+ buffers/cache:      28932     752024
 Swap:            0          0          0

bash-4.2# cat /proc/zoneinfo

Node 0, zone      DMA
  pages free     3389
        min      14
        low      17
        high     21
        scanned  0
        spanned  4095
        present  3998
        managed  3977
    nr_free_pages 3389
...
  start_pfn:         1
  inactive_ratio:    1
Node 0, zone    DMA32
  pages free     73724
        min      341
        low      426
        high     511
        scanned  0
        spanned  98304
        present  98304
        managed  92958
    nr_free_pages 73724
...
  start_pfn:         4096
  inactive_ratio:    1
Node 0, zone   Normal
  pages free     32630
        min      120
        low      150
        high     180
        scanned  0
        spanned  32768
        present  32768
        managed  32768
    nr_free_pages 32630
...
  start_pfn:         262144
  inactive_ratio:    1
Node 0, zone  Movable
  pages free     65476
        min      241
        low      301
        high     361
        scanned  0
        spanned  98304
        present  65536
        managed  65536
    nr_free_pages 65476
...
  start_pfn:         294912
  inactive_ratio:    1

v1 -> v2:
 - introduce zone_for_memory() to arch independent code to make arch
   dependent code simpler, following Dave Hansen's comments.
 - Paste free and zoneinfo result in patch 0 as a response to
   Zhang Yanfei.
 - Fix a problem in tile to add memory into ZONE_HIGHMEM by default.

Wang Nan (7):
  memory-hotplug: add zone_for_memory() for selecting zone for new
    memory
  memory-hotplug: x86_64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
  memory-hotplug: x86_32: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
  memory-hotplug: ia64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
  memory-hotplug: ppc: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
  memory-hotplug: sh: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE
  memory-hotplug: tile: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

 arch/ia64/mm/init.c            |  3 ++-
 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c          |  3 ++-
 arch/sh/mm/init.c              |  5 +++--
 arch/tile/mm/init.c            |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/mm/init_32.c          |  3 ++-
 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c          |  3 ++-
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |  1 +
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 1/7] memory-hotplug: add zone_for_memory() for selecting zone for new memory

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces a zone_for_memory function in arch independent
code for arch_add_memory() using.

Many arch_add_memory() function simply selects ZONE_HIGHMEM or
ZONE_NORMAL and add new memory into it. However, with the existance of
ZONE_MOVABLE, the selection method should be carefully considered: if
new, higher memory is added after ZONE_MOVABLE is setup, the default
zone and ZONE_MOVABLE may overlap each other.

should_add_memory_movable() checks the status of ZONE_MOVABLE. If it has
already contain memory, compare the address of new memory and movable
memory. If new memory is higher than movable, it should be added into
ZONE_MOVABLE instead of default zone.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |  1 +
 mm/memory_hotplug.c            | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
index 010d125..3de3d02 100644
--- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static inline void remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size) {}
 extern int walk_memory_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
 		void *arg, int (*func)(struct memory_block *, void *));
 extern int add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
+extern int zone_for_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, int zone_default);
 extern int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size);
 extern int offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages);
 extern bool is_memblock_offlined(struct memory_block *mem);
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index 469bbf5..348fda7 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -1156,6 +1156,34 @@ static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * If movable zone has already been setup, newly added memory should be check.
+ * If its address is higher than movable zone, it should be added as movable.
+ * Without this check, movable zone may overlap with other zone.
+ */
+static int should_add_memory_movable(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
+{
+	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
+	struct zone *movable_zone = pgdat->node_zones + ZONE_MOVABLE;
+
+	if (zone_is_empty(movable_zone))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (movable_zone->zone_start_pfn <= start_pfn)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int zone_for_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size, int zone_default)
+{
+	if (should_add_memory_movable(nid, start, size))
+		return ZONE_MOVABLE;
+
+	return zone_default;
+}
+
 /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
 int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 2/7] memory-hotplug: x86_64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on x86_64
to ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index df1a992..5621c47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -691,7 +691,8 @@ static void  update_end_of_memory_vars(u64 start, u64 size)
 int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
 	struct pglist_data *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
-	struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones + ZONE_NORMAL;
+	struct zone *zone = pgdat->node_zones +
+		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_NORMAL);
 	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	int ret;
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 3/7] memory-hotplug: x86_32: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on x86_32
to ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/init_32.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index e395048..7d05565 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -825,7 +825,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 {
 	struct pglist_data *pgdata = NODE_DATA(nid);
-	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones + ZONE_HIGHMEM;
+	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones +
+		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_HIGHMEM);
 	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 4/7] memory-hotplug: ia64: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on ia64 to
ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/ia64/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
index 25c3502..892d43e 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/mm/init.c
@@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 
 	pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
 
-	zone = pgdat->node_zones + ZONE_NORMAL;
+	zone = pgdat->node_zones +
+		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_NORMAL);
 	ret = __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
 
 	if (ret)
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 5/7] memory-hotplug: ppc: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on powerpc
to ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
index 2c8e90f..e0f7a18 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* this should work for most non-highmem platforms */
-	zone = pgdata->node_zones;
+	zone = pgdata->node_zones +
+		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, 0);
 
 	return __add_pages(nid, zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
 }
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 6/7] memory-hotplug: sh: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on sh to
ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/sh/mm/init.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/init.c b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
index 2d089fe..2790b6a 100644
--- a/arch/sh/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/sh/mm/init.c
@@ -495,8 +495,9 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
 	pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
 
 	/* We only have ZONE_NORMAL, so this is easy.. */
-	ret = __add_pages(nid, pgdat->node_zones + ZONE_NORMAL,
-				start_pfn, nr_pages);
+	ret = __add_pages(nid, pgdat->node_zones +
+			zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_NORMAL),
+			start_pfn, nr_pages);
 	if (unlikely(ret))
 		printk("%s: Failed, __add_pages() == %d\n", __func__, ret);
 
-- 
1.8.4

[PATCH v2 7/7] memory-hotplug: tile: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on tile to
ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
already setup.

This patch also fix a problem: on tile, new memory should be added into
ZONE_HIGHMEM by default, not MAX_NR_ZONES-1, which is ZONE_MOVABLE.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
---
 arch/tile/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/init.c b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
index bfb3127..22ac6c1 100644
--- a/arch/tile/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
@@ -872,7 +872,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 int arch_add_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
 {
 	struct pglist_data *pgdata = &contig_page_data;
-	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES-1;
+	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones +
+		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_HIGHMEM);
 	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 	unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
 
-- 
1.8.4

Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] memory-hotplug: add zone_for_memory() for selecting zone for new memory

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 07/21/2014 07:46 AM, Wang Nan wrote:

    Some grammar nitpicking.

> This patch introduces a zone_for_memory function in arch independent
> code for arch_add_memory() using.

    s/ using/'s use/.

> Many arch_add_memory() function simply selects ZONE_HIGHMEM or

    Plural needed with "many".

> ZONE_NORMAL and add new memory into it. However, with the existance of
> ZONE_MOVABLE, the selection method should be carefully considered: if
> new, higher memory is added after ZONE_MOVABLE is setup, the default
> zone and ZONE_MOVABLE may overlap each other.

> should_add_memory_movable() checks the status of ZONE_MOVABLE. If it has
> already contain memory, compare the address of new memory and movable
> memory. If new memory is higher than movable, it should be added into
> ZONE_MOVABLE instead of default zone.

> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
[...]

> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 469bbf5..348fda7 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1156,6 +1156,34 @@ static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +/*
> + * If movable zone has already been setup, newly added memory should be check.

    Checked.

WBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] memory-hotplug: tile: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Wang Nan]

Hi Andrew,

Please drop patch 7/7 from -mm tree and keep other 6 patches.

arch_add_memory() in tile is different from others: no nid parameter.
Patch 7/7 will block compiling.

I cc this mail to Chris Metcalf and hope he can look at this issue.

Other 6 patches looks good.

On 2014/7/21 11:46, Wang Nan wrote:
> This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on tile to
> ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
> already setup.
> 
> This patch also fix a problem: on tile, new memory should be added into
> ZONE_HIGHMEM by default, not MAX_NR_ZONES-1, which is ZONE_MOVABLE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
> Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/tile/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/init.c b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> index bfb3127..22ac6c1 100644
> --- a/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
> @@ -872,7 +872,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>  int arch_add_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>  {
>  	struct pglist_data *pgdata = &contig_page_data;
> -	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES-1;
> +	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones +
> +		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_HIGHMEM);
>  	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  	unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> 

Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] memory-hotplug: tile: suitable memory should go to ZONE_MOVABLE

[Chris Metcalf]

On 7/21/2014 11:09 PM, Wang Nan wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Please drop patch 7/7 from -mm tree and keep other 6 patches.
>
> arch_add_memory() in tile is different from others: no nid parameter.
> Patch 7/7 will block compiling.
>
> I cc this mail to Chris Metcalf and hope he can look at this issue.
>
> Other 6 patches looks good.
>
> On 2014/7/21 11:46, Wang Nan wrote:
>> This patch introduces zone_for_memory() to arch_add_memory() on tile to
>> ensure new, higher memory added into ZONE_MOVABLE if movable zone has
>> already setup.
>>
>> This patch also fix a problem: on tile, new memory should be added into
>> ZONE_HIGHMEM by default, not MAX_NR_ZONES-1, which is ZONE_MOVABLE.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
>> Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/tile/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/init.c b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
>> index bfb3127..22ac6c1 100644
>> --- a/arch/tile/mm/init.c
>> +++ b/arch/tile/mm/init.c
>> @@ -872,7 +872,8 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
>>  int arch_add_memory(u64 start, u64 size)
>>  {
>>  	struct pglist_data *pgdata = &contig_page_data;
>> -	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones + MAX_NR_ZONES-1;
>> +	struct zone *zone = pgdata->node_zones +
>> +		zone_for_memory(nid, start, size, ZONE_HIGHMEM);
>>  	unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>  	unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>  

This code is entirely stale; it came from the initial port of Linux
2.6.15 to Tilera.  Since we have always used DISCONTIGMEM unconditionally,
which forces NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES to be true, this code never compiles.
Note the completely irrelevant comment about x86 in this ifdef block, too :-)

The cleanest thing to do is just remove those three functions in the
ifdef block.  I'll do that to our internal tree and plan to push the
change upstream later.

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com