Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask

[Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>]

Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> * Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> [2021-04-07 07:19:10]:
>
>> Sorry for the delay in following up here.
>> 
>
> No issues.
>
>> >> So I'd suggest that pseries_add_processor() be made to update
>> >> these things when the CPUs are marked present, before onlining them.
>> >
>> > In pseries_add_processor, we are only marking the cpu as present. i.e
>> > I believe numa_setup_cpu() would not have been called. So we may not have a
>> > way to associate the CPU to the node. Otherwise we will have to call
>> > numa_setup_cpu() or the hcall_vphn.
>> >
>> > We could try calling numa_setup_cpu() immediately after we set the
>> > CPU to be present, but that would be one more extra hcall + I dont know if
>> > there are any more steps needed before CPU being made present and
>> > associating the CPU to the node.
>> 
>> An additional hcall in this path doesn't seem too expensive.
>> 
>> > Are we sure the node is already online?
>> 
>> I see that dlpar_online_cpu() calls find_and_online_cpu_nid(), so yes I
>> think that's covered.
>
> Okay, 
>
> Can we just call set_cpu_numa_node() at the end of map_cpu_to_node().
> The advantage would be the update to numa_cpu_lookup_table and cpu_to_node
> would happen at the same time and would be in sync.

I don't know. I guess this question just makes me wonder whether powerpc
needs to have the additional lookup table. How is it different from the
generic per_cpu numa_node?