From: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>,
Geetika Moolchandani <Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 07:23:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtu2fk59.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210409101409.GA2633526@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> That leaves us with just 2 options for now.
> 1. Update numa_mem later and only update numa_node here.
> - Over a longer period of time, this would be more confusing since we
> may lose track of why we are splitting the set of numa_node and numa_mem.
>
> or
> 2. Use my earlier patch.
>
> My choice would be to go with my earlier patch.
> Please do let me know your thoughts on the same.
OK, agreed. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 15:42 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/smp: Set numa node before updating mask Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-01 22:51 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-02 3:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-07 12:19 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-07 16:49 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-07 19:46 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-08 11:11 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-08 20:00 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-09 10:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-04-13 12:23 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2021-04-13 12:25 ` Nathan Lynch
2021-04-19 4:00 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtu2fk59.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Geetika.Moolchandani1@ibm.com \
--cc=cheloha@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).