From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Anderson <andmike@linux.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
Ryan Grimm <grimm@linux.ibm.com>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thiago Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Restrict LDBAR access
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 22:57:31 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h87sg24k.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190628200825.31049-7-cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> When the ultravisor firmware is available, it takes control over the
> LDBAR register. In this case, thread-imc updates and save/restore
> operations on the LDBAR register are handled by ultravisor.
Please roll up the replies to Alexey's question about LDBAR into the
change log.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> index f9b2620fbecd..cffb365d9d02 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.S
> @@ -375,8 +375,10 @@ BEGIN_FTR_SECTION
> mtspr SPRN_RPR, r0
> ld r0, KVM_SPLIT_PMMAR(r6)
> mtspr SPRN_PMMAR, r0
> +BEGIN_FW_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(70)
> ld r0, KVM_SPLIT_LDBAR(r6)
> mtspr SPRN_LDBAR, r0
> +END_FW_FTR_SECTION_NESTED(FW_FEATURE_ULTRAVISOR, 0, 70)
That's in Power8 code isn't it? Which will never have an ultravisor.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-imc.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-imc.c
> index 1b6932890a73..5fe2d4526cbc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-imc.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-imc.c
> @@ -254,6 +254,10 @@ static int opal_imc_counters_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> bool core_imc_reg = false, thread_imc_reg = false;
> u32 type;
>
> + /* Disable IMC devices, when Ultravisor is enabled. */
> + if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_ULTRAVISOR))
> + return -EACCES;
I don't mind taking this change. But at the same time should the IMC
stuff just be omitted from the device tree when we're in ultravisor mode?
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-11 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 20:08 [PATCH v4 0/8] kvmppc: Paravirtualize KVM to support ultravisor Claudio Carvalho
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Introduce the MSR_S bit Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 17:38 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 0:59 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-07-12 0:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-07-12 6:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 21:07 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] powerpc: Introduce FW_FEATURE_ULTRAVISOR Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 17:40 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 18:01 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-15 4:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Add generic ultravisor call handler Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 17:55 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-13 17:42 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-15 4:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 1:18 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Use UV_WRITE_PATE ucall to register a PATE Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 17:57 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-17 14:59 ` Ryan Grimm
2019-07-18 21:25 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-19 2:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Restrict flush of the partition tlb cache Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-01 5:54 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-08 20:05 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 19:54 ` janani
2019-07-10 17:09 ` Ram Pai
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Restrict LDBAR access Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-01 5:54 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-01 6:17 ` maddy
2019-07-01 6:30 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2019-07-01 6:46 ` Ram Pai
2019-07-13 17:56 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 20:22 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-07-15 0:38 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Enter a secure guest Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 20:53 ` janani
2019-07-08 20:52 ` Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-18 2:47 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2019-07-22 11:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-07-12 2:03 ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-06-28 20:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] KVM: PPC: Ultravisor: Check for MSR_S during hv_reset_msr Claudio Carvalho
2019-07-08 20:54 ` janani
2019-07-11 12:57 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h87sg24k.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=andmike@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=grimm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).