linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:57:31 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJ1=5ABi5N50HLTSu2xFGJJSf-6EpuvhkG-rxSbv3MZdw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANk1AXSLZLn6XjC=nv3+pK_NQc_VL5MxWfOW9mLCgv_eFYvPPw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:25 PM Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
> >
> > Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> > triggered by overlay release.  The checks are intended to detect
> > possible memory leaks and invalid overlays.
>
> I've tested v5, nothing new to report.

Does that mean everything broken or everything works great? In the
latter case, care to give a Tested-by.

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-24 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-18 22:46 [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at, de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-10-19  5:00 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Frank Rowand
2018-10-22 21:24 ` Alan Tull
2018-10-24 19:57   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-10-25 15:25     ` Alan Tull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL_JsqJ1=5ABi5N50HLTSu2xFGJJSf-6EpuvhkG-rxSbv3MZdw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).