linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:24:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANk1AXSLZLn6XjC=nv3+pK_NQc_VL5MxWfOW9mLCgv_eFYvPPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539902796-8382-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 PM <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>
> Add checks to (1) overlay apply process and (2) memory freeing
> triggered by overlay release.  The checks are intended to detect
> possible memory leaks and invalid overlays.

I've tested v5, nothing new to report.

Alan

>
> The checks revealed bugs in existing code.  Fixed the bugs.
>
> While fixing bugs, noted other issues, which are fixed in
> separate patches.
>
> *****  Powerpc folks: I was not able to test the patches that
> *****  directly impact Powerpc systems that use dynamic
> *****  devicetree.  Please review that code carefully and
> *****  test.  The specific patches are: 03/16, 04/16, 07/16
>
> FPGA folks:
>
>   I made the validation checks that should result in an
>   invalid live devicetree report "ERROR" and cause the overlay apply
>   to fail.
>
>   I made the memory leak validation tests report "WARNING" and allow
>   the overlay apply to complete successfully.  Please let me know
>   if you encounter the warnings.  There are at least two paths
>   forward to deal with the cases that trigger the warning: (1) change
>   the warning to an error and fail the overlay apply, or (2) find a
>   way to detect the potential memory leaks and free the memory
>   appropriately.
>
> ALL people:
>
>   The validations do _not_ address another major concern I have with
>   releasing overlays, which is use after free errors.
>
> Changes since v4:
>   - 01/18: make error message format consistent, error first, path last
>   - 09/18: create of_prop_val_eq() and change open code to use it
>   - 09/18: remove extra blank lines
>
> Changes since v3:
>   - 01/18: Add expected value of refcount for destroy cset entry error.  Also
>     explain the cause of the error.
>
>   - 09/18: for errors of an overlay changing the value of #size-cells or
>     #address-cells, return -EINVAL so that overlay apply will fail
>   - 09/18: for errors of an overlay changing the value of #size-cells or
>     #address-cells, make the message more direct.
>     Old message:
>       OF: overlay: ERROR: overlay and/or live tree #size-cells invalid in node /soc/base_fpga_region
>     New message:
>       OF: overlay: ERROR: changing value of /soc/base_fpga_region/#size-cells not allowed
>
>   - 13/18: Update patch comment header to state that this patch modifies the
>     previous patch to not return immediately on fragment error and
>     explain this is not a performance issue.
>   - 13/18: remove redundant "overlay" from two error messages.  "OF: overlay:"
>     is already present in pr_fmt()
>
> Changes since v2:
>
>   - 13/18: Use continue to reduce indentation in find_dup_cset_node_entry()
>     and find_dup_cset_prop()
>
> Changes since v1:
>
>   - move patch 16/16 to 17/18
>   - move patch 15/16 to 18/18
>   - new patch 15/18
>   - new patch 16/18
>
>   - 05/18: add_changeset_node() header comment: incorrect comment for @target
>
>   - 18/18: add same fix for of_parse_phandle_with_args()
>   - 18/18: add same fix for of_parse_phandle_with_args_map()
>
>
> *** BLURB HERE ***
>
> Frank Rowand (18):
>   of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal
>   of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset
>   of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs
>   powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node()
>   of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes
>   of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for new nodes
>   of: dynamic: change type of of_{at,de}tach_node() to void
>   of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment
>   of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and
>     #size-cells
>   of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique
>   of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node
>   of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete same node
>   of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property
>   of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument
>   of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node
>   of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata
>   of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index
>   of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*()
>
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/dlpar.c             |  15 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/reconfig.c          |   6 +-
>  drivers/of/dynamic.c                               |  68 +++--
>  drivers/of/kobj.c                                  |   4 +-
>  drivers/of/overlay.c                               | 292 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile                  |   2 +
>  .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts  |  28 ++
>  .../of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts  |  24 ++
>  drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts          |   1 +
>  drivers/of/unittest.c                              |  96 +++++--
>  include/linux/of.h                                 |  25 +-
>  11 files changed, 439 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_node.dts
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_bad_add_dup_prop.dts
>
> --
> Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-22 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-18 22:46 [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 01/18] of: overlay: add tests to validate kfrees from overlay removal frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 02/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_put() after add new node to changeset frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 03/18] of: overlay: add missing of_node_get() in __of_attach_node_sysfs frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 04/18] powerpc/pseries: add of_node_put() in dlpar_detach_node() frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/18] of: overlay: use prop add changeset entry for property in new nodes frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/18] of: overlay: do not duplicate properties from overlay for " frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/18] of: dynamic: change type of of_{at, de}tach_node() to void frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 08/18] of: overlay: reorder fields in struct fragment frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 09/18] of: overlay: validate overlay properties #address-cells and #size-cells frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 10/18] of: overlay: make all pr_debug() and pr_err() messages unique frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 11/18] of: overlay: test case of two fragments adding same node frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 12/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments add or delete " frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 13/18] of: overlay: check prevents multiple fragments touching same property frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 14/18] of: unittest: remove unused of_unittest_apply_overlay() argument frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 15/18] of: overlay: set node fields from properties when add new overlay node frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 16/18] of: unittest: allow base devicetree to have symbol metadata frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 17/18] of: unittest: find overlays[] entry by name instead of index frowand.list
2018-10-18 22:46 ` [PATCH v5 18/18] of: unittest: initialize args before calling of_*parse_*() frowand.list
2018-10-19  5:00 ` [PATCH v5 00/18] of: overlay: validation checks, subsequent fixes Frank Rowand
2018-10-22 21:24 ` Alan Tull [this message]
2018-10-24 19:57   ` Rob Herring
2018-10-25 15:25     ` Alan Tull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANk1AXSLZLn6XjC=nv3+pK_NQc_VL5MxWfOW9mLCgv_eFYvPPw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).