linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 15:44:12 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1309061539310.11068@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376991021-12160-13-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

Hi

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:

> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> 
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
> 
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
> 
> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 23 ++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.=
> c
> index ad1fde2..5b05c26 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
> @@ -174,29 +174,17 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cpu0_cpufreq_driver =3D =
> {
> =20
>  static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -=09struct device_node *np, *parent;
> +=09struct device_node *np;
>  =09int ret;
> =20
> -=09parent =3D of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
> -=09if (!parent) {
> -=09=09pr_err("failed to find OF /cpus\n");
> -=09=09return -ENOENT;
> -=09}
> -
> -=09for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
> -=09=09if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points", NULL))
> -=09=09=09break;
> -=09}
> +=09cpu_dev =3D &pdev->dev;
> =20
> +=09np =3D of_node_get(cpu_dev->of_node);

Has this actually been tested? This seems to break cpufreq-cpu0. The 
reason is, that this probe function is called not for the DT CPU node, but 
for a special virtual cpufreq-cpu0 platform device, typically created by 
platforms, using

	platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0);

which then of course doesn't have on .of_node associated with it.

Thanks
Guennadi

>  =09if (!np) {
>  =09=09pr_err("failed to find cpu0 node\n");
> -=09=09ret =3D -ENOENT;
> -=09=09goto out_put_parent;
> +=09=09return -ENOENT;
>  =09}
> =20
> -=09cpu_dev =3D &pdev->dev;
> -=09cpu_dev->of_node =3D np;
> -
>  =09cpu_reg =3D devm_regulator_get(cpu_dev, "cpu0");
>  =09if (IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) {
>  =09=09/*
> @@ -269,15 +257,12 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device =
> *pdev)
>  =09}
> =20
>  =09of_node_put(np);
> -=09of_node_put(parent);
>  =09return 0;
> =20
>  out_free_table:
>  =09opp_free_cpufreq_table(cpu_dev, &freq_table);
>  out_put_node:
>  =09of_node_put(np);
> -out_put_parent:
> -=09of_node_put(parent);
>  =09return ret;
>  }
> =20
> --=20
> 1.8.1.2
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-08 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1374492747-13879-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
2013-08-15 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09   ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09   ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  9:41     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-21  5:10       ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-15 17:09   ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  4:49     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  8:48       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:32         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 12:44           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  4:50     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  8:43       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09   ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39   ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39     ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:13       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:13         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-17 10:50       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 22:09         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-17 22:22           ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-19 10:19           ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 13:02             ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:56               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:59                 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 16:51                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-28 19:46                   ` Grant Likely
2013-08-29  9:50                     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-16 17:39     ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:14       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:21         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:11       ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:24         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30 ` [PATCH v4 00/19] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 01/19] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 02/19] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 03/19] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:27     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:22       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 21:48         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22  6:15     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22 13:29       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 04/19] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 05/19] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 06/19] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 15:18     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 07/19] of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 08/19] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 09/19] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 10/19] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 11/19] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-06 13:44     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
2013-09-09  9:24       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 14:32         ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 15:24           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10  2:44             ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 10:56               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 11:19                 ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 13/19] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 14/19] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 15/19] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 16/19] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 17/19] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 18/19] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 19/19] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1309061539310.11068@axis700.grange \
    --to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jonas@southpole.se \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).