From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:37:10 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1204301451270.2986@eggly.anvils> (raw)
Hi Paul,
On 3.4.0-rc4-next-20120427 and preceding linux-nexts (I've not tried
rc5-next-20120430 but expect it's the same), on PowerPC G5 quad with
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, I'm getting spurious
"BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context" messages from
__might_sleep().
Just once I saw such a message during startup. Once I saw such a
message when rebuilding the machine's kernel. Usually I see them
when I'm running a swapping load of kernel builds under memory
pressure (but that's what I'm habitually running there): perhaps
after a few minutes a flurry comes, then goes away, comes back
again later, and after perhaps a couple of hours of that I see
"INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls" messages too, and soon it
freezes (or perhaps it's still running, but I'm so flooded by
messages that I reboot anyway).
Rather like from before you fixed schedule_tail() for your per-cpu
RCU mods, but not so easy to reproduce. I did a bisection and indeed
it converged as expected on the RCU changes. No such problem seen on
x86: it looks as if there's some further tweak required on PowerPC.
Here are my RCU config options (I don't usually have the TORTURE_TEST
in, but tried that for half an hour this morning, in the hope that it
would generate the issue: but it did not).
# RCU Subsystem
CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU=y
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU=y
CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT=64
# CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT is not set
CONFIG_TREE_RCU_TRACE=y
# CONFIG_RCU_BOOST is not set
CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE=y
# CONFIG_SPARSE_RCU_POINTER is not set
CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST=m
CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_TIMEOUT=60
# CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_VERBOSE is not set
# CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO is not set
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE=y
Here's the message when I was rebuilding the G5's kernel:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/pagemap.h:354
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 6886, name: cc1
Call Trace:
[c0000001a99f78e0] [c00000000000f34c] .show_stack+0x6c/0x16c (unreliable)
[c0000001a99f7990] [c000000000077b40] .__might_sleep+0x11c/0x134
[c0000001a99f7a10] [c0000000000c6228] .filemap_fault+0x1fc/0x494
[c0000001a99f7af0] [c0000000000e7c9c] .__do_fault+0x120/0x684
[c0000001a99f7c00] [c000000000025790] .do_page_fault+0x458/0x664
[c0000001a99f7e30] [c000000000005868] handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30
I've plenty more examples, most of them from page faults or from kswapd;
but I don't think there's any more useful information in them.
Anything I can try later on?
Thanks!
Hugh
next reply other threads:[~2012-04-30 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-30 22:37 Hugh Dickins [this message]
2012-04-30 23:14 ` linux-next ppc64: RCU mods cause __might_sleep BUGs Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 0:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-01 5:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 14:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-01 21:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 23:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 20:25 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-02 20:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 21:20 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-05-02 21:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-02 22:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-03 0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-03 0:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 16:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-07 18:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-05-07 21:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2012-05-01 13:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1204301451270.2986@eggly.anvils \
--to=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).