[Bug 203517] New: WARNING: inconsistent lock state. inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.

* [Bug 203517] New: WARNING: inconsistent lock state. inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
@ 2019-05-05  0:21 bugzilla-daemon
  2019-05-05  0:22 ` [Bug 203517] " bugzilla-daemon
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2019-05-05  0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203517

            Bug ID: 203517
           Summary: WARNING: inconsistent lock state. inconsistent
                    {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
           Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 5.1.0-rc7
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: PPC-64
          Assignee: platform_ppc-64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
          Reporter: erhard_f@mailbox.org
        Regression: Yes

Created attachment 282613
  --> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=282613&action=edit
dmesg (5.1.0-rc7, Talos II)

I have not seen this on my amd64 machines on the 5.1-rcX kernels I've been
running for some time, so I am filing this agains ppc64 platform specific.

I am running some zram-compressed swap space via systemd:
/sbin/zram-init -d0 -s32 -azstd -Lzram_swap 4096

Have not seen this in 5.0.x and before.

[...]
[  313.402874] ================================
[  313.402875] WARNING: inconsistent lock state
[  313.402879] 5.1.0-rc7 #1 Not tainted
[  313.402880] --------------------------------
[  313.402882] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
[  313.402885] swapper/5/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
[  313.402888] 0000000080d1120c (&(&wsm.lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at:
.zstd_reclaim_timer_fn+0x40/0x230
[  313.402895] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
[  313.402899]   .lock_acquire+0xd0/0x240
[  313.402903]   ._raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x60
[  313.402906]   .zstd_get_workspace+0xd0/0x360
[  313.402908]   .end_compressed_bio_read+0x3b8/0x540
[  313.402911]   .bio_endio+0x174/0x2c0
[  313.402914]   .end_workqueue_fn+0x4c/0x70
[  313.402917]   .normal_work_helper+0x138/0x7e0
[  313.402920]   .process_one_work+0x324/0x790
[  313.402922]   .worker_thread+0x68/0x570
[  313.402925]   .kthread+0x19c/0x1b0
[  313.402928]   .ret_from_kernel_thread+0x58/0x78
[  313.402930] irq event stamp: 2629216
[  313.402933] hardirqs last  enabled at (2629216): [<c0000000009da738>]
._raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x38/0x60
[  313.402936] hardirqs last disabled at (2629215): [<c0000000009da4c4>]
._raw_spin_lock_irq+0x24/0x70
[  313.402939] softirqs last  enabled at (2629212): [<c0000000000af9fc>]
.irq_enter+0x8c/0xd0
[  313.402942] softirqs last disabled at (2629213): [<c0000000000afb58>]
.irq_exit+0x118/0x170
[  313.402944] 
               other info that might help us debug this:
[  313.402945]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  313.402947]        CPU0
[  313.402948]        ----
[  313.402949]   lock(&(&wsm.lock)->rlock);
[  313.402951]   <Interrupt>
[  313.402952]     lock(&(&wsm.lock)->rlock);
[  313.402954] 
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  313.402957] 1 lock held by swapper/5/0:
[  313.402958]  #0: 000000004b612042 ((&wsm.timer)){+.-.}, at:
.call_timer_fn+0x0/0x3c0
[  313.402963] 
               stack backtrace:
[  313.402967] CPU: 5 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/5 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc7 #1
[  313.402968] Call Trace:
[  313.402972] [c0000007fa262e70] [c0000000009b3294] .dump_stack+0xe0/0x15c
(unreliable)
[  313.402975] [c0000007fa262f10] [c000000000125548]
.print_usage_bug+0x348/0x390
[  313.402978] [c0000007fa262fd0] [c000000000125cb4] .mark_lock+0x724/0x930
[  313.402981] [c0000007fa263080] [c000000000126c20]
.__lock_acquire+0xc90/0x16a0
[  313.402984] [c0000007fa2631b0] [c000000000128040] .lock_acquire+0xd0/0x240
[  313.402987] [c0000007fa263280] [c0000000009da2b4] ._raw_spin_lock+0x34/0x60
[  313.402990] [c0000007fa263300] [c00000000054b0b0]
.zstd_reclaim_timer_fn+0x40/0x230
[  313.402993] [c0000007fa2633d0] [c000000000158b38] .call_timer_fn+0xc8/0x3c0
[  313.402996] [c0000007fa2634a0] [c000000000158f74] .expire_timers+0x144/0x260
[  313.402999] [c0000007fa263550] [c000000000159178]
.run_timer_softirq+0xe8/0x230
[  313.403002] [c0000007fa263680] [c0000000009db288] .__do_softirq+0x188/0x5d4
[  313.403004] [c0000007fa263790] [c0000000000afb58] .irq_exit+0x118/0x170
[  313.403008] [c0000007fa263800] [c000000000028d88]
.timer_interrupt+0x158/0x430
[  313.403012] [c0000007fa2638b0] [c0000000000091d4]
decrementer_common+0x134/0x140
[  313.403017] --- interrupt: 901 at replay_interrupt_return+0x0/0x4
                   LR = .arch_local_irq_restore.part.0+0x68/0x80
[  313.403020] [c0000007fa263bb0] [c00000000001a3ac]
.arch_local_irq_restore.part.0+0x2c/0x80 (unreliable)
[  313.403024] [c0000007fa263c30] [c0000000007bbbcc]
.cpuidle_enter_state+0xec/0x670
[  313.403027] [c0000007fa263d00] [c0000000000f5130] .call_cpuidle+0x40/0x90
[  313.403031] [c0000007fa263d70] [c0000000000f554c] .do_idle+0x2dc/0x3a0
[  313.403034] [c0000007fa263e30] [c0000000000f59ac]
.cpu_startup_entry+0x2c/0x30
[  313.403037] [c0000007fa263ea0] [c000000000045674]
.start_secondary+0x644/0x650
[  313.403041] [c0000007fa263f90] [c00000000000ad5c]
start_secondary_prolog+0x10/0x14
[...]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread