linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
@ 2008-08-07 12:48 Matthias Fuchs
  2008-08-07 13:19 ` Kumar Gala
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2008-08-07 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev

This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval setup
on initialization and by ioctl().

Tested on PPC440EPx sequoia evaluation board.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    6 +++++-
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
index 7708244..9db5478 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ u32 booke_wdt_period = WDT_PERIOD_DEFAULT;
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
 #define WDTP(x)		((((63-x)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-x)&0x3c)<<15))
+#define WDTP_MASK	(WDTP(63))
 #else
 #define WDTP(x)		(TCR_WP(x))
+#define WDTP_MASK	(TCR_WP_MASK)
 #endif
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(booke_wdt_lock);
@@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ static void __booke_wdt_enable(void *data)
 	/* clear status before enabling watchdog */
 	__booke_wdt_ping(NULL);
 	val = mfspr(SPRN_TCR);
+	val &= ~WDTP_MASK;
 	val |= (TCR_WIE|TCR_WRC(WRC_CHIP)|WDTP(booke_wdt_period));
 
 	mtspr(SPRN_TCR, val);
@@ -106,7 +109,8 @@ static int booke_wdt_ioctl(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
 	case WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT:
 		if (get_user(booke_wdt_period, p))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		mtspr(SPRN_TCR, (mfspr(SPRN_TCR)&~WDTP(0))|WDTP(booke_wdt_period));
+		tmp = mfspr(SPRN_TCR) & ~WDTP_MASK;
+		mtspr(SPRN_TCR, tmp | WDTP(booke_wdt_period));
 		return 0;
 	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
 		return put_user(booke_wdt_period, p);
-- 
1.5.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-08-07 12:48 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting Matthias Fuchs
@ 2008-08-07 13:19 ` Kumar Gala
  2008-08-07 14:04   ` Matthias Fuchs
  2008-09-19 21:28   ` Matthias Fuchs
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2008-08-07 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Fuchs; +Cc: linuxppc-dev


On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:

> This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval  
> setup
> on initialization and by ioctl().
>
> Tested on PPC440EPx sequoia evaluation board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    6 +++++-
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

can you be more explicit about what the bug was.

- k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-08-07 13:19 ` Kumar Gala
@ 2008-08-07 14:04   ` Matthias Fuchs
  2008-09-19 21:28   ` Matthias Fuchs
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2008-08-07 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

Sure,

the former line:

 mtspr(SPRN_TCR, (mfspr(SPRN_TCR)&~WDTP(0))|WDTP(booke_wdt_period));

tries to mask the wdt interval period bits by and'ing with ~WDTP(0) which
is 0xffffffff. So no bits are cleared and or'ing a new value does not change anything.
The default interval is '3' which is the maximum, so any attempt to set a new
interval keeps the former '3'.

The patch correctly masks the period bits in SPRN_TCR before writing the new value.

That's all.

Matthias

On Thursday 07 August 2008 15:19, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval  
> > setup
> > on initialization and by ioctl().
> >
> > Tested on PPC440EPx sequoia evaluation board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    6 +++++-
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> can you be more explicit about what the bug was.
> 
> - k
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-08-07 13:19 ` Kumar Gala
  2008-08-07 14:04   ` Matthias Fuchs
@ 2008-09-19 21:28   ` Matthias Fuchs
  2008-09-19 21:44     ` Kumar Gala
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2008-09-19 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev

Hi Kumar,

should I resend this my patch? Is there chance to get it applied.
It really fixes a bug!

Matthias

On Thursday 07 August 2008 15:19:10 Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> > This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval
> > setup
> > on initialization and by ioctl().
> >
> > Tested on PPC440EPx sequoia evaluation board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    6 +++++-
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> can you be more explicit about what the bug was.
>
> - k
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-09-19 21:28   ` Matthias Fuchs
@ 2008-09-19 21:44     ` Kumar Gala
  2008-09-23 15:04       ` [PATCH V2] " Matthias Fuchs
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Gala @ 2008-09-19 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Fuchs; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

Please repost and I'll look at it again.. I'm trying to be more  
diligent about patchworks.ozlabs.org and tracking things there.

- k

On Sep 19, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:

> Hi Kumar,
>
> should I resend this my patch? Is there chance to get it applied.
> It really fixes a bug!
>
> Matthias
>
> On Thursday 07 August 2008 15:19:10 Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Matthias Fuchs wrote:
>>> This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval
>>> setup
>>> on initialization and by ioctl().
>>>
>>> Tested on PPC440EPx sequoia evaluation board.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    6 +++++-
>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> can you be more explicit about what the bug was.
>>
>> - k
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-09-19 21:44     ` Kumar Gala
@ 2008-09-23 15:04       ` Matthias Fuchs
  2008-09-23 16:31         ` Timur Tabi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2008-09-23 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kumar Gala; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

This patch fixes the setting of the Book-E watchdog timer interval setup
on initialization and by ioctl().

On initialization the period bits have to be masked before setting
a new period.

In WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT ioctl we have to use the currect mask.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Fuchs <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com>
---
 drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
index c3b78a7..41ba9b8 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/booke_wdt.c
@@ -42,8 +42,10 @@ u32 booke_wdt_period = WDT_PERIOD_DEFAULT;
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
 #define WDTP(x)		((((63-x)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-x)&0x3c)<<15))
+#define WDTP_MASK	(WDTP(63))
 #else
 #define WDTP(x)		(TCR_WP(x))
+#define WDTP_MASK	(TCR_WP_MASK)
 #endif
 
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(booke_wdt_lock);
@@ -65,6 +67,7 @@ static void __booke_wdt_enable(void *data)
 	/* clear status before enabling watchdog */
 	__booke_wdt_ping(NULL);
 	val = mfspr(SPRN_TCR);
+	val &= ~WDTP_MASK;
 	val |= (TCR_WIE|TCR_WRC(WRC_CHIP)|WDTP(booke_wdt_period));
 
 	mtspr(SPRN_TCR, val);
@@ -114,7 +117,7 @@ static long booke_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	case WDIOC_SETTIMEOUT:
 		if (get_user(booke_wdt_period, p))
 			return -EFAULT;
-		mtspr(SPRN_TCR, (mfspr(SPRN_TCR) & ~WDTP(0)) |
+		mtspr(SPRN_TCR, (mfspr(SPRN_TCR) & ~WDTP_MASK) |
 						WDTP(booke_wdt_period));
 		return 0;
 	case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
-- 
1.5.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-09-23 15:04       ` [PATCH V2] " Matthias Fuchs
@ 2008-09-23 16:31         ` Timur Tabi
  2008-11-03  8:56           ` Matthias Fuchs
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2008-09-23 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Fuchs; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Matthias Fuchs
<matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> wrote:
>  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
>  #define WDTP(x)                ((((63-x)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-x)&0x3c)<<15))
> +#define WDTP_MASK      (WDTP(63))

WDTP(63) is "((((63-63)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-63)&0x3c)<<15))", which is
equal to 0.  Shouldn't WDTP_MASK be equal to "(3 << 30) | (15 << 15)"?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-09-23 16:31         ` Timur Tabi
@ 2008-11-03  8:56           ` Matthias Fuchs
  2008-11-03 16:28             ` Timur Tabi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Matthias Fuchs @ 2008-11-03  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Timur Tabi; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

Timur,

I missed you posting. But you are right. My patch is ok for 4xx CPUs and touching 
the CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE path was not my intention.

So for CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE WDTP_MASK should be WDTP(0). There is still a slightly difference
between WDTP(0)="(3 << 30) | (0x3c << 15)" and "(3 << 30) | (15 << 15)". 
Can you check that please and I will resend my patch.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Matthias

On Tuesday 23 September 2008 18:31, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Matthias Fuchs
> <matthias.fuchs@esd-electronics.com> wrote:
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
> >  #define WDTP(x)                ((((63-x)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-x)&0x3c)<<15))
> > +#define WDTP_MASK      (WDTP(63))
> 
> WDTP(63) is "((((63-63)&0x3)<<30)|(((63-63)&0x3c)<<15))", which is
> equal to 0.  Shouldn't WDTP_MASK be equal to "(3 << 30) | (15 << 15)"?
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting
  2008-11-03  8:56           ` Matthias Fuchs
@ 2008-11-03 16:28             ` Timur Tabi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2008-11-03 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthias Fuchs; +Cc: linuxppc-dev

Matthias Fuchs wrote:
> Timur,
> 
> I missed you posting. But you are right. My patch is ok for 4xx CPUs and touching 
> the CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE path was not my intention.
> 
> So for CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE WDTP_MASK should be WDTP(0). There is still a slightly difference
> between WDTP(0)="(3 << 30) | (0x3c << 15)" and "(3 << 30) | (15 << 15)". 
> Can you check that please and I will resend my patch.

Yes, I think WDTP(0) is correct for Book E.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-03 16:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-07 12:48 [PATCH] powerpc: Fix Book-E watchdog timer interval setting Matthias Fuchs
2008-08-07 13:19 ` Kumar Gala
2008-08-07 14:04   ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-09-19 21:28   ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-09-19 21:44     ` Kumar Gala
2008-09-23 15:04       ` [PATCH V2] " Matthias Fuchs
2008-09-23 16:31         ` Timur Tabi
2008-11-03  8:56           ` Matthias Fuchs
2008-11-03 16:28             ` Timur Tabi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).