live-patching.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: gor@linux.ibm.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jikos@kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	joe.lawrence@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	hca@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Fix task_try_func()
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:05:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922110836.005204425@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210922110506.703075504@infradead.org

Clarify and fix task_try_func(). Move the smp_rmb() up to avoid
re-loading p->on_rq in the false case, but add a p->on_rq reload after
acquiring rq->lock, after all, it could have gotten dequeued while
waiting for the lock.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4005,7 +4005,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
 	 * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in
 	 * __schedule().  See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock().
 	 *
-	 * A similar smb_rmb() lives in try_invoke_on_locked_down_task().
+	 * A similar smb_rmb() lives in task_try_func().
 	 */
 	smp_rmb();
 	if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ttwu_runnable(p, wake_flags))
@@ -4124,25 +4124,48 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
  */
 int task_try_func(struct task_struct *p, task_try_f func, void *arg)
 {
+	unsigned int state;
 	struct rq_flags rf;
-	int ret = -EAGAIN; /* raced, try again later */
 	struct rq *rq;
+	int ret = -EAGAIN; /* raced, try again later */
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);
+
+	state = READ_ONCE(p->__state);
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure we load p->on_rq after p->__state, otherwise it would be
+	 * possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0.
+	 *
+	 * See try_to_wake_up() for a longer comment.
+	 */
+	smp_rmb();
+
 	if (p->on_rq) {
 		rq = __task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
-		if (task_rq(p) == rq)
+
+		/* re-check p->on_rq now that we hold rq->lock */
+		if (p->on_rq && task_rq(p) == rq)
 			ret = func(p, arg);
+
 		rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
+
 	} else {
-		switch (READ_ONCE(p->__state)) {
+
+		switch (state) {
 		case TASK_RUNNING:
 		case TASK_WAKING:
+			/*
+			 * We raced against wakeup, try again later.
+			 */
 			break;
+
 		default:
-			smp_rmb(); // See smp_rmb() comment in try_to_wake_up().
-			if (!p->on_rq)
-				ret = func(p, arg);
+			/*
+			 * Since we hold ->pi_lock, we serialize against
+			 * try_to_wake_up() and any blocked state must remain.
+			 */
+			ret = func(p, arg);
 		}
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, rf.flags);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-22 11:05 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched,rcu: Rework try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched,livepatch: Use task_try_func() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 12:05   ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 13:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched: Simplify wake_up_*idle*() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched,livepatch: Use wake_up_if_idle() Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 13:05   ` Miroslav Benes
2021-09-23 12:19     ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] context_tracking: Provide SMP ordering using RCU Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 15:17   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 19:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 19:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-22 19:59         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 19:53       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-09-22 20:02         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 12:10   ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-24 18:57   ` Joel Savitz
2021-09-27 14:33     ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-22 11:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] livepatch,context_tracking: Avoid disturbing NOHZ_FULL tasks Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-23 13:14   ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:28     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-09-24  7:33       ` Petr Mladek
2021-09-23 13:22 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched,rcu,context_tracking,livepatch: Improve livepatch task transitions for idle and NOHZ_FULL cpus Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210922110836.005204425@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sumanthk@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).