linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>
To: <Administrator@osdl.org>
Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kthread_create
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 16:39:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00aa01c415a4$0e315370$d100000a@sbs2003.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040103030802.BD1DB2C06E@lists.samba.org>

On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, Rusty Russell wrote:

> In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401020856150.2278-100000@bigblue.dev.mdolabs.com> you write:
> > Rusty, you still have to use global static data when there is no need.
> 
> And you're still putting obscure crap in the task struct when there's
> no need.  Honestly, I'd be ashamed to post such a patch.

Ashamed !? Take a look at your original patch and then define shame. You 
had a communication mechanism that whilst being a private 1<->1 
communication among two tasks, relied on a single global message 
strucure, lock and mutex. Honestly I do not like myself to add stuff 
inside a strcture for one-time use. Not because of adding 12 bytes to the 
struct, that are laughable. But because it is used by a small piece of 
code w/out a re-use ability for other things.



> > I like this version better though ;)
> 
> I think I should seek a second opinion though.

But of course, even a third one ;)



- Davide





  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-29 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-31  3:31 [PATCH 1/2] kthread_create Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  4:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-31  5:28   ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  6:34     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-31  8:47       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-01 23:51       ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  4:49 ` Andrew Morton
2003-12-31  5:18   ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  5:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-31  5:34   ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-31  5:56     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-31  6:27       ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-01  3:45         ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-02  7:09           ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-02 16:58             ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-03  3:05               ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-03  3:43                 ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-03 11:47                   ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-04  4:23                     ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-29 15:42                     ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-03 19:00                   ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-03 23:53                     ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-04  2:34                     ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-04  4:42                       ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-04  4:55                         ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-04  9:35                         ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-04 23:03                           ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-05  4:09                             ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-05  5:06                               ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-05  6:38                                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-05  6:52                                   ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-07  7:00                                     ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-07  7:25                                       ` Davide Libenzi
2004-01-08  0:33                                         ` Rusty Russell
2004-03-29 15:42                         ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-29 15:42                       ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-29 15:41                     ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-29 15:42                     ` Rusty Russell
2004-03-29 15:40                   ` Davide Libenzi
2004-03-29 15:41                   ` Rusty Russell
2004-03-29 15:39                 ` Davide Libenzi [this message]
2004-03-29 15:39               ` Rusty Russell
2004-03-29 15:38             ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-31  6:31       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2003-12-31  7:12         ` Davide Libenzi
2003-12-31 23:25           ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-31 18:02 Albert Cahalan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00aa01c415a4$0e315370$d100000a@sbs2003.local' \
    --to=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=Administrator@osdl.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).