linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	penberg@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Clean up the code comment in slab kmem_cache struct
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 23:48:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01000163d7803909-286c20d2-9928-4e07-94fc-ee6552e04c67-000000@email.amazonses.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180606012624.GA19425@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>

On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Baoquan He wrote:

> I am back porting Thomas's sl[a|u]b freelist randomization feature to
> our distros, need go through slab code for better understanding. From
> git log history, they were 'obj_offset' and 'obj_size'. Later on
> 'obj_size' was renamed to 'object_size' in commit 3b0efdfa1e("mm, sl[aou]b:
> Extract common fields from struct kmem_cache") which is from your patch.
> With my understanding, I guess you changed that on purpose because
> object_size is size of each object, obj_offset is for the whole cache,
> representing the offset the real object starts to be stored. And putting
> them separately is for better desribing them in code comment and
> distinction, e.g 'object_size' is in "4) cache creation/removal",
> while 'obj_offset' is put alone to indicate it's for the whole.

obj_offset only applies when CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG is set. Ok so that screwy
name also indicates that something special goes on.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-06 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-03  3:24 [PATCH] slab: Clean up the code comment in slab kmem_cache struct Baoquan He
2018-06-05 17:04 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-06-06  1:26   ` Baoquan He
2018-06-06 23:48     ` Christopher Lameter [this message]
2018-06-08  2:04       ` Baoquan He

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01000163d7803909-286c20d2-9928-4e07-94fc-ee6552e04c67-000000@email.amazonses.com \
    --to=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).