linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
@ 2013-03-23  4:04 Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] of/pci: Add of_pci_parse_bus_range() function Jingoo Han
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

From: Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com>

This patch factors out common implementations patterns to reduce overall kernel
code and provide a means for host bridge drivers to directly obtain struct
resources from the DT's ranges property without relying on architecture specific
DT handling. This will make it easier to write archiecture independent host bridge
drivers and mitigate against further duplication of DT parsing code.

This patch can be used in the following way:

	struct of_pci_range_iter iter;
	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, np) {

		//directly access properties of the address range, e.g.:
		//iter.pci_space, iter.pci_addr, iter.cpu_addr, iter.size or
		//iter.flags

		//alternatively obtain a struct resource, e.g.:
		//struct resource res;
		//range_iter_fill_resource(iter, np, res);
	}

Additionally the implementation takes care of adjacent ranges and merges them
into a single range (as was the case with powerpc and microblaze).

The modifications to microblaze, mips and powerpc have not been tested.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <Andrew.Murray@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c |  106 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 arch/mips/pci/pci.c              |   44 ++++------------
 arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c |   93 ++++++++++-----------------------
 drivers/of/address.c             |   54 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_address.h       |   31 +++++++++++
 5 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
index bdb8ea1..5eabe35 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/pci/pci-common.c
@@ -657,67 +657,36 @@ void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *dev, int bar,
 void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 				  struct device_node *dev, int primary)
 {
-	const u32 *ranges;
-	int rlen;
-	int pna = of_n_addr_cells(dev);
-	int np = pna + 5;
 	int memno = 0, isa_hole = -1;
-	u32 pci_space;
-	unsigned long long pci_addr, cpu_addr, pci_next, cpu_next, size;
 	unsigned long long isa_mb = 0;
 	struct resource *res;
+	struct of_pci_range_iter iter;
 
 	pr_info("PCI host bridge %s %s ranges:\n",
 	       dev->full_name, primary ? "(primary)" : "");
 
-	/* Get ranges property */
-	ranges = of_get_property(dev, "ranges", &rlen);
-	if (ranges == NULL)
-		return;
-
-	/* Parse it */
 	pr_debug("Parsing ranges property...\n");
-	while ((rlen -= np * 4) >= 0) {
+	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, dev) {
 		/* Read next ranges element */
-		pci_space = ranges[0];
-		pci_addr = of_read_number(ranges + 1, 2);
-		cpu_addr = of_translate_address(dev, ranges + 3);
-		size = of_read_number(ranges + pna + 3, 2);
-
-		pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx ",
-				pci_space, pci_addr);
-		pr_debug("cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",
-					cpu_addr, size);
-
-		ranges += np;
+		pr_debug("pci_space: 0x%08x pci_addr:0x%016llx "
+				"cpu_addr:0x%016llx size:0x%016llx\n",
+				iter.pci_space, iter.pci_addr, iter.cpu_addr,
+				iter.size);
 
 		/* If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region
 		 * (some FW try to feed us with non sensical zero sized regions
 		 * such as power3 which look like some kind of attempt
 		 * at exposing the VGA memory hole)
 		 */
-		if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
+		if (iter.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || iter.size == 0)
 			continue;
 
-		/* Now consume following elements while they are contiguous */
-		for (; rlen >= np * sizeof(u32);
-		     ranges += np, rlen -= np * 4) {
-			if (ranges[0] != pci_space)
-				break;
-			pci_next = of_read_number(ranges + 1, 2);
-			cpu_next = of_translate_address(dev, ranges + 3);
-			if (pci_next != pci_addr + size ||
-			    cpu_next != cpu_addr + size)
-				break;
-			size += of_read_number(ranges + pna + 3, 2);
-		}
-
 		/* Act based on address space type */
 		res = NULL;
-		switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
-		case 1:		/* PCI IO space */
+		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
 			pr_info("  IO 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx\n",
-			       cpu_addr, cpu_addr + size - 1, pci_addr);
+				iter.cpu_addr, iter.cpu_addr + iter.size - 1,
+				iter.pci_addr);
 
 			/* We support only one IO range */
 			if (hose->pci_io_size) {
@@ -725,11 +694,11 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 				continue;
 			}
 			/* On 32 bits, limit I/O space to 16MB */
-			if (size > 0x01000000)
-				size = 0x01000000;
+			if (iter.size > 0x01000000)
+				iter.size = 0x01000000;
 
 			/* 32 bits needs to map IOs here */
-			hose->io_base_virt = ioremap(cpu_addr, size);
+			hose->io_base_virt = ioremap(iter.cpu_addr, iter.size);
 
 			/* Expect trouble if pci_addr is not 0 */
 			if (primary)
@@ -738,19 +707,18 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 			/* pci_io_size and io_base_phys always represent IO
 			 * space starting at 0 so we factor in pci_addr
 			 */
-			hose->pci_io_size = pci_addr + size;
-			hose->io_base_phys = cpu_addr - pci_addr;
+			hose->pci_io_size = iter.pci_addr + iter.size;
+			hose->io_base_phys = iter.cpu_addr - iter.pci_addr;
 
 			/* Build resource */
 			res = &hose->io_resource;
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
-			res->start = pci_addr;
-			break;
-		case 2:		/* PCI Memory space */
-		case 3:		/* PCI 64 bits Memory space */
+			iter.cpu_addr = iter.pci_addr;
+		} else if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
 			pr_info(" MEM 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx %s\n",
-			       cpu_addr, cpu_addr + size - 1, pci_addr,
-			       (pci_space & 0x40000000) ? "Prefetch" : "");
+				iter.cpu_addr, iter.cpu_addr + iter.size - 1,
+				iter.pci_addr,
+				(iter.pci_space & 0x40000000) ?
+				"Prefetch" : "");
 
 			/* We support only 3 memory ranges */
 			if (memno >= 3) {
@@ -758,13 +726,13 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 				continue;
 			}
 			/* Handles ISA memory hole space here */
-			if (pci_addr == 0) {
+			if (iter.pci_addr == 0) {
 				isa_mb = cpu_addr;
 				isa_hole = memno;
 				if (primary || isa_mem_base == 0)
-					isa_mem_base = cpu_addr;
-				hose->isa_mem_phys = cpu_addr;
-				hose->isa_mem_size = size;
+					isa_mem_base = iter.cpu_addr;
+				hose->isa_mem_phys = iter.cpu_addr;
+				hose->isa_mem_size = iter.size;
 			}
 
 			/* We get the PCI/Mem offset from the first range or
@@ -772,30 +740,22 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 			 * hole. If they don't match, bugger.
 			 */
 			if (memno == 0 ||
-			    (isa_hole >= 0 && pci_addr != 0 &&
+			    (isa_hole >= 0 && iter.pci_addr != 0 &&
 			     hose->pci_mem_offset == isa_mb))
-				hose->pci_mem_offset = cpu_addr - pci_addr;
-			else if (pci_addr != 0 &&
-				 hose->pci_mem_offset != cpu_addr - pci_addr) {
+				hose->pci_mem_offset = iter.cpu_addr
+							- iter.pci_addr;
+			else if (iter.pci_addr != 0 &&
+				 hose->pci_mem_offset != iter.cpu_addr
+							- iter.pci_addr) {
 				pr_info(" \\--> Skipped (offset mismatch) !\n");
 				continue;
 			}
 
 			/* Build resource */
 			res = &hose->mem_resources[memno++];
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
-			if (pci_space & 0x40000000)
-				res->flags |= IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
-			res->start = cpu_addr;
-			break;
-		}
-		if (res != NULL) {
-			res->name = dev->full_name;
-			res->end = res->start + size - 1;
-			res->parent = NULL;
-			res->sibling = NULL;
-			res->child = NULL;
 		}
+		if (res != NULL)
+			range_iter_fill_resource(iter, dev, res);
 	}
 
 	/* If there's an ISA hole and the pci_mem_offset is -not- matching
diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
index 0872f12..8358cf8 100644
--- a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c
@@ -122,51 +122,27 @@ static void pcibios_scanbus(struct pci_controller *hose)
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 void pci_load_of_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose, struct device_node *node)
 {
-	const __be32 *ranges;
-	int rlen;
-	int pna = of_n_addr_cells(node);
-	int np = pna + 5;
+	struct of_pci_range_iter iter;
 
 	pr_info("PCI host bridge %s ranges:\n", node->full_name);
-	ranges = of_get_property(node, "ranges", &rlen);
-	if (ranges == NULL)
-		return;
 	hose->of_node = node;
 
-	while ((rlen -= np * 4) >= 0) {
-		u32 pci_space;
+	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, node) {
 		struct resource *res = NULL;
-		u64 addr, size;
-
-		pci_space = be32_to_cpup(&ranges[0]);
-		addr = of_translate_address(node, ranges + 3);
-		size = of_read_number(ranges + pna + 3, 2);
-		ranges += np;
-		switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
-		case 1:		/* PCI IO space */
+
+		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
 			pr_info("  IO 0x%016llx..0x%016llx\n",
-					addr, addr + size - 1);
+					iter.addr, iter.addr + iter.size - 1);
 			hose->io_map_base =
-				(unsigned long)ioremap(addr, size);
+				(unsigned long)ioremap(iter.addr, iter.size);
 			res = hose->io_resource;
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
-			break;
-		case 2:		/* PCI Memory space */
-		case 3:		/* PCI 64 bits Memory space */
+		} else if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
 			pr_info(" MEM 0x%016llx..0x%016llx\n",
-					addr, addr + size - 1);
+					iter.addr, iter.addr + iter.size - 1);
 			res = hose->mem_resource;
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
-			break;
-		}
-		if (res != NULL) {
-			res->start = addr;
-			res->name = node->full_name;
-			res->end = res->start + size - 1;
-			res->parent = NULL;
-			res->sibling = NULL;
-			res->child = NULL;
 		}
+		if (res != NULL)
+			range_iter_fill_resource(iter, node, res);
 	}
 }
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
index fa12ae4..9230b27 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
@@ -676,61 +676,31 @@ void pci_resource_to_user(const struct pci_dev *dev, int bar,
 void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 				  struct device_node *dev, int primary)
 {
-	const u32 *ranges;
-	int rlen;
-	int pna = of_n_addr_cells(dev);
-	int np = pna + 5;
 	int memno = 0, isa_hole = -1;
-	u32 pci_space;
-	unsigned long long pci_addr, cpu_addr, pci_next, cpu_next, size;
 	unsigned long long isa_mb = 0;
 	struct resource *res;
+	struct of_pci_range_iter iter;
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "PCI host bridge %s %s ranges:\n",
 	       dev->full_name, primary ? "(primary)" : "");
 
-	/* Get ranges property */
-	ranges = of_get_property(dev, "ranges", &rlen);
-	if (ranges == NULL)
-		return;
-
 	/* Parse it */
-	while ((rlen -= np * 4) >= 0) {
-		/* Read next ranges element */
-		pci_space = ranges[0];
-		pci_addr = of_read_number(ranges + 1, 2);
-		cpu_addr = of_translate_address(dev, ranges + 3);
-		size = of_read_number(ranges + pna + 3, 2);
-		ranges += np;
-
+	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, dev) {
 		/* If we failed translation or got a zero-sized region
 		 * (some FW try to feed us with non sensical zero sized regions
 		 * such as power3 which look like some kind of attempt at exposing
 		 * the VGA memory hole)
 		 */
-		if (cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || size == 0)
+		if (iter.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR || iter.size == 0)
 			continue;
 
-		/* Now consume following elements while they are contiguous */
-		for (; rlen >= np * sizeof(u32);
-		     ranges += np, rlen -= np * 4) {
-			if (ranges[0] != pci_space)
-				break;
-			pci_next = of_read_number(ranges + 1, 2);
-			cpu_next = of_translate_address(dev, ranges + 3);
-			if (pci_next != pci_addr + size ||
-			    cpu_next != cpu_addr + size)
-				break;
-			size += of_read_number(ranges + pna + 3, 2);
-		}
-
 		/* Act based on address space type */
 		res = NULL;
-		switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
-		case 1:		/* PCI IO space */
+		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
 			printk(KERN_INFO
 			       "  IO 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx\n",
-			       cpu_addr, cpu_addr + size - 1, pci_addr);
+			       iter.cpu_addr, iter.cpu_addr + iter.size - 1,
+			       iter.pci_addr);
 
 			/* We support only one IO range */
 			if (hose->pci_io_size) {
@@ -740,11 +710,11 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 			}
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC32
 			/* On 32 bits, limit I/O space to 16MB */
-			if (size > 0x01000000)
-				size = 0x01000000;
+			if (iter.size > 0x01000000)
+				iter.size = 0x01000000;
 
 			/* 32 bits needs to map IOs here */
-			hose->io_base_virt = ioremap(cpu_addr, size);
+			hose->io_base_virt = ioremap(iter.cpu_addr, iter.size);
 
 			/* Expect trouble if pci_addr is not 0 */
 			if (primary)
@@ -754,20 +724,18 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 			/* pci_io_size and io_base_phys always represent IO
 			 * space starting at 0 so we factor in pci_addr
 			 */
-			hose->pci_io_size = pci_addr + size;
-			hose->io_base_phys = cpu_addr - pci_addr;
+			hose->pci_io_size = iter.pci_addr + iter.size;
+			hose->io_base_phys = iter.cpu_addr - iter.pci_addr;
 
 			/* Build resource */
 			res = &hose->io_resource;
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
-			res->start = pci_addr;
-			break;
-		case 2:		/* PCI Memory space */
-		case 3:		/* PCI 64 bits Memory space */
+			iter.cpu_addr = iter.pci_addr;
+		} else if (flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {
 			printk(KERN_INFO
 			       " MEM 0x%016llx..0x%016llx -> 0x%016llx %s\n",
-			       cpu_addr, cpu_addr + size - 1, pci_addr,
-			       (pci_space & 0x40000000) ? "Prefetch" : "");
+			       iter.cpu_addr, iter.cpu_addr + iter.size - 1,
+			       iter.pci_addr,
+			       (iter.pci_space & 0x40000000) ? "Prefetch" : "");
 
 			/* We support only 3 memory ranges */
 			if (memno >= 3) {
@@ -776,13 +744,13 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 				continue;
 			}
 			/* Handles ISA memory hole space here */
-			if (pci_addr == 0) {
+			if (iter.pci_addr == 0) {
 				isa_mb = cpu_addr;
 				isa_hole = memno;
 				if (primary || isa_mem_base == 0)
-					isa_mem_base = cpu_addr;
-				hose->isa_mem_phys = cpu_addr;
-				hose->isa_mem_size = size;
+					isa_mem_base = iter.cpu_addr;
+				hose->isa_mem_phys = iter.cpu_addr;
+				hose->isa_mem_size = iter.size;
 			}
 
 			/* We get the PCI/Mem offset from the first range or
@@ -790,11 +758,13 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 			 * hole. If they don't match, bugger.
 			 */
 			if (memno == 0 ||
-			    (isa_hole >= 0 && pci_addr != 0 &&
+			    (isa_hole >= 0 && iter.pci_addr != 0 &&
 			     hose->pci_mem_offset == isa_mb))
-				hose->pci_mem_offset = cpu_addr - pci_addr;
+				hose->pci_mem_offset = iter.cpu_addr -
+							iter.pci_addr;
 			else if (pci_addr != 0 &&
-				 hose->pci_mem_offset != cpu_addr - pci_addr) {
+				 hose->pci_mem_offset != iter.cpu_addr -
+							iter.pci_addr) {
 				printk(KERN_INFO
 				       " \\--> Skipped (offset mismatch) !\n");
 				continue;
@@ -802,19 +772,10 @@ void pci_process_bridge_OF_ranges(struct pci_controller *hose,
 
 			/* Build resource */
 			res = &hose->mem_resources[memno++];
-			res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
-			if (pci_space & 0x40000000)
-				res->flags |= IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
-			res->start = cpu_addr;
 			break;
 		}
-		if (res != NULL) {
-			res->name = dev->full_name;
-			res->end = res->start + size - 1;
-			res->parent = NULL;
-			res->sibling = NULL;
-			res->child = NULL;
-		}
+		if (res != NULL)
+			range_iter_fill_resource(iter, dev, res);
 	}
 
 	/* If there's an ISA hole and the pci_mem_offset is -not- matching
diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
index 04da786..2ab34e2 100644
--- a/drivers/of/address.c
+++ b/drivers/of/address.c
@@ -227,6 +227,60 @@ int of_pci_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int bar,
 	return __of_address_to_resource(dev, addrp, size, flags, NULL, r);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_address_to_resource);
+
+struct of_pci_range_iter *of_pci_process_ranges(struct of_pci_range_iter *iter,
+						struct device_node *node)
+{
+	const int na = 3, ns = 2;
+	int rlen;
+
+	if (!iter->range) {
+		iter->pna = of_n_addr_cells(node);
+		iter->np = iter->pna + na + ns;
+
+		iter->range = of_get_property(node, "ranges", &rlen);
+		if (iter->range == NULL)
+			return NULL;
+
+		iter->end = iter->range + rlen / sizeof(__be32);
+	}
+
+	if (iter->range + iter->np > iter->end)
+		return NULL;
+
+	iter->pci_space = be32_to_cpup(iter->range);
+	iter->flags = of_bus_pci_get_flags(iter->range);
+	iter->pci_addr = of_read_number(iter->range + 1, ns);
+	iter->cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, iter->range + na);
+	iter->size = of_read_number(iter->range + iter->pna + na, ns);
+
+	iter->range += iter->np;
+
+	/* Now consume following elements while they are contiguous */
+	while (iter->range + iter->np <= iter->end) {
+		u32 flags, pci_space;
+		u64 pci_addr, cpu_addr, size;
+
+		pci_space = be32_to_cpup(iter->range);
+		flags = of_bus_pci_get_flags(iter->range);
+		pci_addr = of_read_number(iter->range + 1, ns);
+		cpu_addr = of_translate_address(node, iter->range + na);
+		size = of_read_number(iter->range + iter->pna + na, ns);
+
+		if (flags != iter->flags)
+			break;
+		if (pci_addr != iter->pci_addr + iter->size ||
+		    cpu_addr != iter->cpu_addr + iter->size)
+			break;
+
+		iter->size += size;
+		iter->range += iter->np;
+	}
+
+	return iter;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_process_ranges);
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI */
 
 /*
diff --git a/include/linux/of_address.h b/include/linux/of_address.h
index 0506eb5..7d5cd11 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_address.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_address.h
@@ -4,6 +4,30 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 
+struct of_pci_range_iter {
+	const __be32 *range, *end;
+	int np, pna;
+
+	u32 pci_space;
+	u64 pci_addr;
+	u64 cpu_addr;
+	u64 size;
+	u32 flags;
+};
+
+#define for_each_of_pci_range(iter, np) \
+	for (memset((iter), 0, sizeof(struct of_pci_range_iter)); \
+	     of_pci_process_ranges(iter, np);)
+
+#define range_iter_fill_resource(iter, np, res) \
+	do { \
+		(res)->flags = (iter).flags; \
+		(res)->start = (iter).cpu_addr; \
+		(res)->end = (iter).cpu_addr + (iter).size - 1; \
+		(res)->parent = (res)->child = (res)->sibling = NULL; \
+		(res)->name = (np)->full_name; \
+	} while (0)
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS
 extern u64 of_translate_address(struct device_node *np, const __be32 *addr);
 extern bool of_can_translate_address(struct device_node *dev);
@@ -27,6 +51,8 @@ static inline unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t addr) { return -1; }
 #define pci_address_to_pio pci_address_to_pio
 #endif
 
+struct of_pci_range_iter *of_pci_process_ranges(struct of_pci_range_iter *iter,
+						struct device_node *node);
 #else /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */
 #ifndef of_address_to_resource
 static inline int of_address_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index,
@@ -53,6 +79,11 @@ static inline const __be32 *of_get_address(struct device_node *dev, int index,
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+struct of_pci_range_iter *of_pci_process_ranges(struct of_pci_range_iter *iter,
+						struct device_node *node)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 #endif /* CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS */
 
 
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/6] of/pci: Add of_pci_parse_bus_range() function
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23  4:05 ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: infrastructure to add drivers in drivers/pci/host Jingoo Han
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>

This function can be used to parse a bus-range property as specified by
device nodes representing PCI bridges.

Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/of/of_pci.c    |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of_pci.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
index 13e37e2..4ca7837 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c
@@ -40,3 +40,28 @@ struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
 	return NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_find_child_device);
+
+/**
+ * of_pci_parse_bus_range() - parse the bus-range property of a PCI device
+ * @node: device node
+ * @res: address to a struct resource to return the bus-range
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success or a negative error-code on failure.
+ */
+int of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res)
+{
+	const __be32 *values;
+	int len;
+
+	values = of_get_property(node, "bus-range", &len);
+	if (!values || len < sizeof(*values) * 2)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	res->name = node->name;
+	res->start = be32_to_cpup(values++);
+	res->end = be32_to_cpup(values);
+	res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_pci_parse_bus_range);
diff --git a/include/linux/of_pci.h b/include/linux/of_pci.h
index bb115de..178a5cc 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_pci.h
@@ -10,5 +10,6 @@ int of_irq_map_pci(const struct pci_dev *pdev, struct of_irq *out_irq);
 struct device_node;
 struct device_node *of_pci_find_child_device(struct device_node *parent,
 					     unsigned int devfn);
+int of_pci_parse_bus_range(struct device_node *node, struct resource *res);
 
 #endif
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/6] pci: infrastructure to add drivers in drivers/pci/host
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] of/pci: Add of_pci_parse_bus_range() function Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23  4:06 ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos Jingoo Han
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>

As agreed by the community, PCI host drivers will now be stored in
drivers/pci/host. This commit adds this directory and the related
Kconfig/Makefile changes to allow new drivers to be added in this
directory.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pci/Kconfig      |    2 ++
 drivers/pci/Makefile     |    3 +++
 drivers/pci/host/Kconfig |    4 ++++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/Kconfig

diff --git a/drivers/pci/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
index 6d51aa6..ac45398 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/Kconfig
@@ -119,3 +119,5 @@ config PCI_IOAPIC
 config PCI_LABEL
 	def_bool y if (DMI || ACPI)
 	select NLS
+
+source "drivers/pci/host/Kconfig"
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Makefile b/drivers/pci/Makefile
index 0c3efcf..6ebf5bf 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pci/Makefile
@@ -67,3 +67,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_FRONTEND) += xen-pcifront.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_OF) += of.o
 
 ccflags-$(CONFIG_PCI_DEBUG) := -DDEBUG
+
+# PCI host controller drivers
+obj-y += host/
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cc3a1af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+menu "PCI host controller drivers"
+	depends on PCI
+
+endmenu
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] of/pci: Add of_pci_parse_bus_range() function Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: infrastructure to add drivers in drivers/pci/host Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23  4:07 ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-26 21:33   ` Rob Herring
  2013-03-23  4:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PCIe support for Exynos5440 Jingoo Han
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

Exynos5440 has a PCIe controller which can be used as Root Complex.
This driver supports a PCIe controller as Root Complex mode.

Signed-off-by: Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla <suren.reddy@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt        |   56 +
 drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |    5 +
 drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
 drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c                      | 1139 ++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 1201 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3eb4a2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+* Samsung Exynos PCIe interface
+
+Required properties:
+-compatible: should be "samsung,exynos5440-pcie"
+-reg: base addresses and lengths of the pcie conteroller,
+	additional register for the pcie controller,
+	the phy controller,
+	additional register for the phy controller.
+- interrupts: interrupt values for level interrupt,
+	pulse interrupt, special interrupt.
+- device_type, set to "pci"
+- bus-range: PCI bus numbers covered
+- ranges: ranges for the PCI memory and I/O regions
+- reset-gpio: gpio pin number of power good signal
+
+Example:
+
+SoC specific DT Entry:
+
+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
+			0x290000 0x1000
+			0x270000 0x1000
+			0x271000 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};
+
+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
+			0x2a0000 0x1000
+			0x272000 0x1000
+			0x271040 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};
+
+Board specific DT Entry:
+
+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		reset-gpio = <5>;
+	};
+
+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		reset-gpio = <22>;
+	};
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
index cc3a1af..31189d9 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
 menu "PCI host controller drivers"
 	depends on PCI
 
+config PCI_EXYNOS
+	bool "Samsung Exynos PCIe controller"
+	depends on SOC_EXYNOS5440
+	select PCIEPORTBUS
+
 endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f1cd2bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_EXYNOS) += pci-exynos.o
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0ea5b2f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
@@ -0,0 +1,1139 @@
+/*
+ * PCIe host controller driver for Samsung EXYNOS SoCs
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
+ *		http://www.samsung.com
+ *
+ * Author: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/gpio.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_pci.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/pci_regs.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/resource.h>
+#include <linux/signal.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+struct pcie_port_info {
+	u32	cfg0_size;
+	u32	cfg1_size;
+	u32	io_size;
+	u32	mem_size;
+	u32	in_mem_size;
+};
+
+struct pcie_port {
+	struct device		*dev;
+	u8			controller;
+	u8			root_bus_nr;
+	void __iomem		*dbi_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_dbi_base;
+	void __iomem		*elbi_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_elbi_base;
+	void __iomem		*base;
+	void __iomem		*phy_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_phy_base;
+	void __iomem		*purple_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_purple_base;
+	void __iomem		*cfg0_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_cfg0_base;
+	void __iomem		*cfg1_base;
+	void __iomem		*va_cfg1_base;
+	void __iomem		*io_base;
+	void __iomem		*mem_base;
+	spinlock_t		conf_lock;
+	struct resource		io;
+	struct resource		mem;
+	struct resource		busn;
+	struct pcie_port_info	config;
+	struct list_head	next;
+	struct clk		*clk;
+	int			irq;
+	int			reset_gpio;
+};
+
+/* synopsis specific PCIE configuration registers*/
+#define PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL		0x710
+#define PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK		(0x3f << 16)
+#define PORT_LINK_MODE_4_LANES		(0x7 << 16)
+
+#define PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL	0x80C
+#define PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE		(0x1 << 17)
+#define PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_MASK	(0x1ff << 8)
+#define PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_4_LANES	(0x7 << 8)
+
+#define PCIE_MSI_ADDR_LO		0x820
+#define PCIE_MSI_ADDR_HI		0x824
+#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE		0x828
+#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_MASK		0x82C
+#define PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS		0x830
+
+#define PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT		0x900
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND		(0x1 << 31)
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND	(0x0 << 31)
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1		(0x1 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0		(0x0 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_CR1			0x904
+#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM		(0x0 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO		(0x2 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0		(0x4 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1		(0x5 << 0)
+#define PCIE_ATU_CR2			0x908
+#define PCIE_ATU_ENABLE			(0x1 << 31)
+#define PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE	(0x1 << 30)
+#define PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE		0x90C
+#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE		0x910
+#define PCIE_ATU_LIMIT			0x914
+#define PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET		0x918
+#define PCIE_ATU_BUS(x)			((x) & 0xff << 24)
+#define PCIE_ATU_DEV(x)			((x) & 0x1f << 19)
+#define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x)		((x) & 0x7 << 16)
+#define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET		0x91C
+
+/* PCIe ELBI registers */
+#define PCIE_IRQ_PULSE			0x000
+#define IRQ_INTA_ASSERT			(0x1 << 0)
+#define IRQ_INTB_ASSERT			(0x1 << 2)
+#define IRQ_INTC_ASSERT			(0x1 << 4)
+#define IRQ_INTD_ASSERT			(0x1 << 6)
+#define PCIE_IRQ_LEVEL			0x004
+#define PCIE_IRQ_SPECIAL		0x008
+#define PCIE_IRQ_EN_PULSE		0x00c
+#define PCIE_IRQ_EN_LEVEL		0x010
+#define PCIE_IRQ_EN_SPECIAL		0x014
+#define PCIE_PWR_RESET			0x018
+#define PCIE_CORE_RESET			0x01c
+#define PCIE_CORE_RESET_ENABLE		(0x1 << 0)
+#define PCIE_STICKY_RESET		0x020
+#define PCIE_NONSTICKY_RESET		0x024
+#define PCIE_APP_INIT_RESET		0x028
+#define PCIE_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE		0x02c
+#define PCIE_ELBI_RDLH_LINKUP		0x064
+#define PCIE_ELBI_LTSSM_ENABLE		0x1
+#define PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC		0x11c
+#define PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC		0x120
+#define PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE	(0x1 << 21)
+
+/* PCIe Purple registers */
+#define PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET		0x000
+#define PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET		0x004
+#define PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG		0x008
+#define PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET		0x00c
+#define PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED		0x010
+#define PCIE_PHY_TRSVREG_RESET		0x020
+#define PCIE_PHY_TRSV_RESET		0x024
+
+/* PCIe PHY registers */
+#define PCIE_PHY_RESET			0x004
+#define PCIE_PHY_CTL0			0x008
+#define PCIE_PHY_CTL1			0x05c
+#define PCIE_PHY_PWR0			0x064
+#define PHY_PWR0_ENABLE			(0x1 << 3)
+#define PCIE_PHY_TXCTRL_LEVEL		0x084
+#define PCIE_PHY_TXCTRL_OP		0x088
+#define PCIE_PHY_PWR1			0x0c4
+#define PHY_PWR1_ENABLE			(0x1 << 7)
+#define PCIE_PHY_PWR2			0x184
+#define PHY_PWR2_ENABLE			(0x1 << 7)
+#define PCIE_PHY_PWR3			0x244
+#define PHY_PWR3_ENABLE			(0x1 << 7)
+#define PCIE_PHY_PWR4			0x304
+#define PHY_PWR4_ENABLE			(0x1 << 7)
+
+static struct list_head pcie_port_list;
+static struct hw_pci exynos_pci;
+
+static inline int cfg_read(void *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
+{
+	*val = readl(addr);
+
+	if (size == 1)
+		*val = (*val >> (8 * (where & 3))) & 0xff;
+	else if (size == 2)
+		*val = (*val >> (8 * (where & 3))) & 0xffff;
+	else if (size != 4)
+		return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
+
+	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
+}
+
+static inline int cfg_write(void *addr, int where, int size, u32 val)
+{
+	if (size == 4)
+		writel(val, addr);
+	else if (size == 2)
+		writew(val, addr + (where & 2));
+	else if (size == 1)
+		writeb(val, addr + (where & 3));
+	else
+		return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER;
+
+	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(struct pcie_port *pp, bool on)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	if (on) {
+		val = readl(pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC);
+		val |= PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE;
+		writel(val, pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC);
+	} else {
+		val = readl(pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC);
+		val &= ~PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE;
+		writel(val, pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_AWMISC);
+	}
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_r_mode(struct pcie_port *pp, bool on)
+{
+	u32 val;
+
+	if (on) {
+		val = readl(pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC);
+		val |= PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE;
+		writel(val, pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC);
+	} else {
+		val = readl(pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC);
+		val &= ~PCIE_ELBI_SLV_DBI_ENABLE;
+		writel(val, pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_SLV_ARMISC);
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void readl_rc(struct pcie_port *pp, void *dbi_base, u32 *val)
+{
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_r_mode(pp, true);
+	*val = readl(dbi_base);
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_r_mode(pp, false);
+	return;
+}
+
+static inline void writel_rc(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 val, void *dbi_base)
+{
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(pp, true);
+	writel(val, dbi_base);
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(pp, false);
+	return;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_rd_own_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, int where, int size,
+		u32 *val)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_r_mode(pp, true);
+	ret = cfg_read(pp->va_dbi_base + (where & ~0x3), where, size, val);
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_r_mode(pp, false);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, int where, int size,
+		u32 val)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(pp, true);
+	ret = cfg_write(pp->va_dbi_base + (where & ~0x3), where, size, val);
+	exynos_pcie_sideband_dbi_w_mode(pp, false);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+
+	/* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : CFG0 */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->cfg0_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->cfg0_base + pp->config.cfg0_size - 1,
+			dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, busdev, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(struct pcie_port *pp, u32 busdev)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+
+	/* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : CFG1 */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_CFG1, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->cfg1_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->cfg1_base + pp->config.cfg1_size - 1,
+			dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, busdev, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+
+	/* Program viewport 0 : OUTBOUND : MEM */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->mem_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)(pp->mem_base + pp->config.mem_size - 1),
+			dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->mem_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+
+	/* Program viewport 1 : OUTBOUND : IO */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_OUTBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->io_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)(pp->io_base + pp->config.io_size - 1),
+			dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, (u32)pp->io_base, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_inbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+	struct pcie_port_info *config = &pp->config;
+
+	/* Program viewport 0 : INBOUND : MEMORY */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX0;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE | PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, config->in_mem_size - 1, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_inbound(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+	struct pcie_port_info *config = &pp->config;
+
+	/* Program viewport 1 : INBOUND : IO */
+	val = PCIE_ATU_REGION_INBOUND | PCIE_ATU_REGION_INDEX1;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_VIEWPORT);
+	writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_IO, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR1);
+	val = PCIE_ATU_ENABLE | PCIE_ATU_BAR_MODE_ENABLE;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_CR2);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_BASE);
+	writel_rc(pp, config->in_mem_size - 1, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LIMIT);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_LOWER_TARGET);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0, dbi_base + PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_rd_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
+		u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 *val)
+{
+	int ret = PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
+	u32 address, busdev;
+
+	busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) |
+		 PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn));
+	address = where & ~0x3;
+
+	if (bus->parent->number == pp->root_bus_nr) {
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
+		ret = cfg_read(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size, val);
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
+	} else {
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
+		ret = cfg_read(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size, val);
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_wr_other_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, struct pci_bus *bus,
+		u32 devfn, int where, int size, u32 val)
+{
+	int ret = PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
+	u32 address, busdev;
+
+	busdev = PCIE_ATU_BUS(bus->number) | PCIE_ATU_DEV(PCI_SLOT(devfn)) |
+		 PCIE_ATU_FUNC(PCI_FUNC(devfn));
+	address = where & ~0x3;
+
+	if (bus->parent->number == pp->root_bus_nr) {
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg0(pp, busdev);
+		ret = cfg_write(pp->va_cfg0_base + address, where, size, val);
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound(pp);
+	} else {
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_cfg1(pp, busdev);
+		ret = cfg_write(pp->va_cfg1_base + address, where, size, val);
+		exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound(pp);
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct pcie_port *controller_to_port(int controller)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+
+	if (controller >= exynos_pci.nr_controllers)
+		return NULL;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(pp, &pcie_port_list, next) {
+		if (pp->controller == controller)
+			return pp;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct pcie_port *bus_to_port(int bus)
+{
+	int i;
+	int rbus;
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+
+	for (i = exynos_pci.nr_controllers - 1 ; i >= 0; i--) {
+		pp = controller_to_port(i);
+		rbus = pp->root_bus_nr;
+		if (rbus != -1 && rbus <= bus)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return i >= 0 ? pp : NULL;
+}
+
+static int __init exynos_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+
+	pp = controller_to_port(nr);
+
+	if (!pp)
+		return 0;
+
+	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io, sys->io_offset);
+	pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
+	pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_link_up(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val = readl(pp->va_elbi_base + PCIE_ELBI_RDLH_LINKUP);
+	if (val == PCIE_ELBI_LTSSM_ENABLE)
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
+				struct pci_bus *bus, int dev)
+{
+	/* If there is no link, then there is no device */
+	if (bus->number != pp->root_bus_nr) {
+		if (!exynos_pcie_link_up(pp))
+			return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* access only one slot on each root port */
+	if (bus->number == pp->root_bus_nr && dev > 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * do not read more than one device on the bus directly attached
+	 * to RC's (Virtual Bridge's) DS side.
+	 */
+	if (bus->primary == pp->root_bus_nr && dev > 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
+			int size, u32 *val)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp = bus_to_port(bus->number);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!pp) {
+		BUG();
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (exynos_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
+		*val = 0xffffffff;
+		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+	}
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
+	if (bus->number != pp->root_bus_nr)
+		ret = exynos_pcie_rd_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn,
+						where, size, val);
+	else
+		ret = exynos_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
+			int where, int size, u32 val)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp = bus_to_port(bus->number);
+	unsigned long flags;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!pp) {
+		BUG();
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (exynos_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
+		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
+	if (bus->number != pp->root_bus_nr)
+		ret = exynos_pcie_wr_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn,
+						where, size, val);
+	else
+		ret = exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pp->conf_lock, flags);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct pci_ops exynos_pcie_ops = {
+	.read = exynos_pcie_rd_conf,
+	.write = exynos_pcie_wr_conf,
+};
+
+static struct pci_bus __init *exynos_pcie_scan_bus(int nr,
+					struct pci_sys_data *sys)
+{
+	struct pci_bus *bus;
+	struct pcie_port *pp = controller_to_port(nr);
+
+	if (pp) {
+		pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
+		bus = pci_scan_root_bus(NULL, sys->busnr, &exynos_pcie_ops,
+					sys, &sys->resources);
+		return bus;
+	} else {
+		bus = NULL;
+		BUG();
+	}
+
+	return bus;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp = bus_to_port(dev->bus->number);
+
+	return pp->irq;
+}
+
+static struct hw_pci exynos_pci = {
+	.setup		= exynos_pcie_setup,
+	.scan		= exynos_pcie_scan_bus,
+	.map_irq	= exynos_pcie_map_irq,
+};
+
+static void exynos_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	struct pcie_port_info *config = &pp->config;
+	void __iomem *dbi_base = pp->va_dbi_base;
+	u32 val;
+	u32 membase;
+	u32 memlimit;
+
+	/* set the number of lines as 4 */
+	readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, &val);
+	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
+	val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_4_LANES;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
+
+	/* set link width speed control register */
+	readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, &val);
+	val &= ~PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_MASK;
+	val |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_4_LANES;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
+
+	/* setup RC BARs */
+	writel_rc(pp, 0x00000004, dbi_base + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
+	writel_rc(pp, 0x00000004, dbi_base + PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_1);
+
+	/* setup interrupt pins */
+	readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE, &val);
+	val &= 0xffff00ff;
+	val |= 0x00000100;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCI_INTERRUPT_LINE);
+
+	/* setup bus numbers */
+	readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCI_PRIMARY_BUS, &val);
+	val &= 0xff000000;
+	val |= 0x00010100;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCI_PRIMARY_BUS);
+
+	/* setup memory base, memory limit */
+	membase = ((u32)pp->mem_base & 0xfff00000) >> 16;
+	memlimit = (config->mem_size + (u32)pp->mem_base) & 0xfff00000;
+	val = memlimit | membase;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCI_MEMORY_BASE);
+
+	/* setup command register */
+	readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCI_COMMAND, &val);
+	val &= 0xffff0000;
+	val |= PCI_COMMAND_IO | PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY |
+		PCI_COMMAND_MASTER | PCI_COMMAND_SERR;
+	writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCI_COMMAND);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+
+	val = readl(elbi_base + PCIE_CORE_RESET);
+	val &= ~PCIE_CORE_RESET_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, elbi_base + PCIE_CORE_RESET);
+	writel(0, elbi_base + PCIE_PWR_RESET);
+	writel(0, elbi_base + PCIE_STICKY_RESET);
+	writel(0, elbi_base + PCIE_NONSTICKY_RESET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+	void __iomem *purple_base = pp->va_purple_base;
+
+	val = readl(elbi_base + PCIE_CORE_RESET);
+	val |= PCIE_CORE_RESET_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, elbi_base + PCIE_CORE_RESET);
+	writel(1, elbi_base + PCIE_STICKY_RESET);
+	writel(1, elbi_base + PCIE_NONSTICKY_RESET);
+	writel(1, elbi_base + PCIE_APP_INIT_RESET);
+	writel(0, elbi_base + PCIE_APP_INIT_RESET);
+	writel(1, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_assert_phy_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	void __iomem *purple_base = pp->va_purple_base;
+
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_MAC_RESET);
+	writel(1, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_deassert_phy_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+	void __iomem *purple_base = pp->va_purple_base;
+
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_GLOBAL_RESET);
+	writel(1, elbi_base + PCIE_PWR_RESET);
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_CMN_REG);
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_TRSVREG_RESET);
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_TRSV_RESET);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_init_phy(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *phy_base = pp->va_phy_base;
+
+	/* power down PHY */
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR0);
+	val |= PHY_PWR0_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR0);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR1);
+	val |= PHY_PWR1_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR1);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR2);
+	val |= PHY_PWR2_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR2);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR3);
+	val |= PHY_PWR3_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR3);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR4);
+	val |= PHY_PWR4_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR4);
+
+	udelay(50);
+
+	/* power up PHY */
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR0);
+	val &= ~PHY_PWR0_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR0);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR1);
+	val &= ~PHY_PWR1_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR1);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR2);
+	val &= ~PHY_PWR2_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR2);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR3);
+	val &= ~PHY_PWR3_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR3);
+
+	val = readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR4);
+	val &= ~PHY_PWR4_ENABLE;
+	writel(val, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PWR4);
+
+	/* reset PHY */
+	writel(0xd5, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_RESET);
+
+	/* set 50Mhz PHY clock */
+	writel(0x15, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CTL0);
+	writel(0x12, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_CTL1);
+
+	/* TX Differential output */
+	writel(0x7f, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_TXCTRL_OP);
+
+	/* TX Pre-emphasis Level Control 11 */
+	writel(0x0, phy_base + PCIE_PHY_TXCTRL_LEVEL);
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_assert_reset(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	if (pp->reset_gpio >= 0)
+		devm_gpio_request_one(pp->dev, pp->reset_gpio,
+				GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "RESET");
+	return;
+}
+
+static int exynos_pcie_establish_link(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	int count = 0;
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+	void __iomem *purple_base = pp->va_purple_base;
+	void __iomem *phy_base = pp->va_phy_base;
+
+	if (exynos_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
+		dev_err(pp->dev, "Link already up\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* assert reset signals */
+	exynos_pcie_assert_core_reset(pp);
+	exynos_pcie_assert_phy_reset(pp);
+
+	/* de-assert phy reset */
+	exynos_pcie_deassert_phy_reset(pp);
+
+	/* initialize phy */
+	exynos_pcie_init_phy(pp);
+
+	/* pulse for common reset */
+	writel(1, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
+	udelay(500);
+	writel(0, purple_base + PCIE_PHY_COMMON_RESET);
+
+	/* de-assert core reset */
+	exynos_pcie_deassert_core_reset(pp);
+
+	/* setup root complex */
+	exynos_pcie_setup_rc(pp);
+
+	/* assert reset signal */
+	exynos_pcie_assert_reset(pp);
+
+	/* assert LTSSM enable */
+	writel(PCIE_ELBI_LTSSM_ENABLE, elbi_base + PCIE_APP_LTSSM_ENABLE);
+
+	/* check if the link is up or not */
+	while (!exynos_pcie_link_up(pp)) {
+		mdelay(100);
+		count++;
+		if (count == 10) {
+			while (readl(phy_base + PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED) == 0) {
+				val = readl(purple_base + PCIE_PHY_PLL_LOCKED);
+				dev_info(pp->dev, "PLL Locked: 0x%x\n", val);
+			}
+			dev_err(pp->dev, "PCIe Link Fail\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	dev_info(pp->dev, "Link up\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_clear_irq_pulse(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+
+	val = readl(elbi_base + PCIE_IRQ_PULSE);
+	writel(val, elbi_base + PCIE_IRQ_PULSE);
+	return;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_enable_irq_pulse(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	u32 val;
+	void __iomem *elbi_base = pp->va_elbi_base;
+
+	/* enable INTX interrupt */
+	val = IRQ_INTA_ASSERT | IRQ_INTB_ASSERT |
+		IRQ_INTC_ASSERT | IRQ_INTD_ASSERT,
+	writel(val, elbi_base + PCIE_IRQ_EN_PULSE);
+	return;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t exynos_pcie_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp = arg;
+
+	exynos_pcie_clear_irq_pulse(pp);
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_enable_interrupts(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	exynos_pcie_enable_irq_pulse(pp);
+	return;
+}
+
+static void exynos_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
+{
+	struct pcie_port_info *config = &pp->config;
+	u32 val;
+
+	/* Keep first 64K for IO */
+	pp->cfg0_base = pp->base;
+	pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg0_base + config->cfg0_size;
+	pp->io_base = pp->cfg1_base + config->cfg1_size;
+	pp->mem_base = pp->io_base + config->io_size;
+
+	/* enable link */
+	exynos_pcie_establish_link(pp);
+
+	/* set view ports for inbound */
+	exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_inbound(pp);
+	exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_io_inbound(pp);
+
+	exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, 4, 0);
+
+	/* program correct class for RC */
+	exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCI_CLASS_DEVICE, 2, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI);
+
+	exynos_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, &val);
+	val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
+	exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
+
+	exynos_pcie_enable_interrupts(pp);
+}
+
+static int add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct resource *dbi_base;
+	struct resource *elbi_base;
+	struct resource *phy_base;
+	struct resource *purple_base;
+	int ret;
+
+	dbi_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	if (!dbi_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get dbi base resource\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, dbi_base->start,
+				resource_size(dbi_base), pdev->name)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dbi base resource is busy\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+	pp->dbi_base = (void __iomem *) (unsigned long)dbi_base->start;
+	pp->va_dbi_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, dbi_base->start,
+			resource_size(dbi_base));
+	if (!pp->va_dbi_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	elbi_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 1);
+	if (!elbi_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get elbi base resource\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, elbi_base->start,
+				resource_size(elbi_base), pdev->name)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "elbi base resource is busy\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+	pp->elbi_base = (void __iomem *) (unsigned long)elbi_base->start;
+	pp->va_elbi_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, elbi_base->start,
+			resource_size(elbi_base));
+	if (!pp->va_elbi_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	phy_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
+	if (!phy_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get phy base resource\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, phy_base->start,
+				resource_size(phy_base), pdev->name)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "phy base resource is busy\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	pp->phy_base = (void __iomem *) (unsigned long)phy_base->start;
+	pp->va_phy_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, phy_base->start,
+			resource_size(phy_base));
+	if (!pp->va_phy_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	purple_base = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 3);
+	if (!purple_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "couldn't get purple base resource\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, purple_base->start,
+				resource_size(purple_base), pdev->name)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "purple base resource is busy\n");
+		return -EBUSY;
+	}
+
+	pp->purple_base = (void __iomem *) (unsigned long)purple_base->start;
+	pp->va_purple_base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, purple_base->start,
+			resource_size(purple_base));
+	if (!pp->va_purple_base) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	pp->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
+	if (!pp->irq) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get irq\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pp->irq, exynos_pcie_irq_handler,
+				IRQF_SHARED, "exynos-pcie", pp);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request irq\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	pp->base = pp->dbi_base;
+
+	pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
+
+	spin_lock_init(&pp->conf_lock);
+	exynos_pcie_host_init(pp);
+	pp->va_cfg0_base = ioremap((u32)pp->cfg0_base, pp->config.cfg0_size);
+	if (!pp->va_cfg0_base) {
+		dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap in function\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	pp->va_cfg1_base = ioremap((u32)pp->cfg1_base, pp->config.cfg1_size);
+	if (!pp->va_cfg1_base) {
+		dev_err(pp->dev, "error with ioremap\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init exynos_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pcie_port *pp;
+	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct of_pci_range_iter iter;
+	int ret;
+
+	pp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pp) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no memory for pcie port\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	pp->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+	/* Get the I/O and memory ranges from DT */
+	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, np) {
+		unsigned long restype = iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
+		if (restype == IORESOURCE_IO) {
+			range_iter_fill_resource(iter, np, &pp->io);
+			pp->io.name = "I/O";
+			pp->config.io_size = resource_size(&pp->io);
+		}
+		if (restype == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
+			range_iter_fill_resource(iter, np, &pp->mem);
+			pp->mem.name = "MEM";
+			pp->config.mem_size = resource_size(&pp->mem);
+		}
+		if (restype == 0) {
+			pp->config.cfg0_size = iter.size/2;
+			pp->config.cfg1_size = iter.size/2;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pp->config.in_mem_size = SZ_256M;
+
+	/* Get the bus range */
+	ret = of_pci_parse_bus_range(np, &pp->busn);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse bus-range property: %d\n",
+			ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "reset-gpio", &pp->reset_gpio);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		pp->reset_gpio = -1;
+
+	ret = add_pcie_port(pp, pdev);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	pp->controller = exynos_pci.nr_controllers;
+	exynos_pci.nr_controllers++;
+	list_add_tail(&pp->next, &pcie_port_list);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __exit exynos_pcie_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id exynos_pcie_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie", },
+	{},
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, exynos_pcie_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver exynos_pcie_driver = {
+	.probe		= exynos_pcie_probe,
+	.remove		= __exit_p(exynos_pcie_remove),
+	.driver = {
+		.name	= "exynos-pcie",
+		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(exynos_pcie_of_match),
+	},
+};
+
+static int exynos_pcie_abort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr,
+			struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
+	unsigned long instr = *(unsigned long *)pc;
+
+	WARN_ONCE(1, "pcie abort\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * If the instruction being executed was a read,
+	 * make it look like it read all-ones.
+	 */
+	if ((instr & 0x0c100000) == 0x04100000) {
+		int reg = (instr >> 12) & 15;
+		unsigned long val;
+
+		if (instr & 0x00400000)
+			val = 255;
+		else
+			val = -1;
+
+		regs->uregs[reg] = val;
+		regs->ARM_pc += 4;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if ((instr & 0x0e100090) == 0x00100090) {
+		int reg = (instr >> 12) & 15;
+
+		regs->uregs[reg] = -1;
+		regs->ARM_pc += 4;
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static int __init pcie_init(void)
+{
+	hook_fault_code(16 + 6, exynos_pcie_abort, SIGBUS, 0,
+			"imprecise external abort");
+
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcie_port_list);
+	platform_driver_probe(&exynos_pcie_driver, exynos_pcie_probe);
+
+	if (exynos_pci.nr_controllers) {
+		pci_common_init(&exynos_pci);
+		pci_assign_unassigned_resources();
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+subsys_initcall(pcie_init);
+
+static void __exit pcie_exit(void)
+{
+	platform_driver_unregister(&exynos_pcie_driver);
+}
+module_exit(pcie_exit);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Samsung PCIe host controller driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PCIe support for Exynos5440
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-23  4:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23  4:08 ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23  4:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Russell King - ARM Linux
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

Enable PCIe support for Exynos5440 which has two PCIe controllers.

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/Kconfig             |    1 +
 arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 5e34364..76c0f75 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1442,6 +1442,7 @@ config PCI_HOST_ITE8152
 	select DMABOUNCE
 
 source "drivers/pci/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/pci/pcie/Kconfig"
 
 source "drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig"
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index ef3b69a..023e178 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5440
 	select AUTO_ZRELADDR
 	select PINCTRL
 	select PINCTRL_EXYNOS5440
+	select MIGHT_HAVE_PCI
 	help
 	  Enable EXYNOS5440 SoC support
 
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-23  4:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PCIe support for Exynos5440 Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23  4:09 ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-25 17:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2013-04-08  9:08   ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-23 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Russell King - ARM Linux
  5 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-23  4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas'
  Cc: linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

Exynos5440 has two PCIe controllers which can be used as root complex
for PCIe interface.

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts |    8 +++++++
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi         |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
index a21eb4c..746f9fc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
@@ -34,4 +34,12 @@
 			clock-frequency = <50000000>;
 		};
 	};
+
+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		reset-gpio = <5>;
+	};
+
+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		reset-gpio = <22>;
+	};
 };
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
index c374a31..41b2d2c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
@@ -178,4 +178,36 @@
 		clocks = <&clock 21>;
 		clock-names = "rtc";
 	};
+
+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
+			0x290000 0x1000
+			0x270000 0x1000
+			0x271000 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
+		#address-cells = <3>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};
+
+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
+			0x2a0000 0x1000
+			0x272000 0x1000
+			0x271040 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
+		#address-cells = <3>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};
 };
-- 
1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
  2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-03-23  4:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-23 10:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  2013-03-23 13:37   ` Thomas Petazzoni
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2013-03-23 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Thomas Petazzoni', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Andrew Murray',
	linux-arm-kernel

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:04:53PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> -		switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> -		case 1:		/* PCI IO space */
> +		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {

Please look at how IORESOURCE_* stuff is defined:
#define IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS    0x00001f00      /* Resource type */
#define IORESOURCE_IO           0x00000100      /* PCI/ISA I/O ports */
#define IORESOURCE_MEM          0x00000200
#define IORESOURCE_REG          0x00000300      /* Register offsets */
#define IORESOURCE_IRQ          0x00000400
#define IORESOURCE_DMA          0x00000800
#define IORESOURCE_BUS          0x00001000

Notice that it's not an array of bits.

So this should be:
		if ((iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) == IORESOURCE_IO) {

> +			iter.cpu_addr = iter.pci_addr;
> +		} else if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {

And this should be:
		} else if ((iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) == IORESOURCE_MEM) {

> +		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {

Same here.

> +		} else if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {

And again here.

> -		switch ((pci_space >> 24) & 0x3) {
> -		case 1:		/* PCI IO space */
> +		if (iter.flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {

ditto.

> +			iter.cpu_addr = iter.pci_addr;
> +		} else if (flags & IORESOURCE_MEM) {

ditto.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
  2013-03-23 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2013-03-23 13:37   ` Thomas Petazzoni
  2013-03-25 10:21     ` Andrew Murray
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Petazzoni @ 2013-03-23 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Russell King - ARM Linux
  Cc: Jingoo Han, 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Andrew Murray',
	linux-arm-kernel


On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:41:56 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> Please look at how IORESOURCE_* stuff is defined:
> #define IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS    0x00001f00      /* Resource type */
> #define IORESOURCE_IO           0x00000100      /* PCI/ISA I/O ports */
> #define IORESOURCE_MEM          0x00000200
> #define IORESOURCE_REG          0x00000300      /* Register offsets */
> #define IORESOURCE_IRQ          0x00000400
> #define IORESOURCE_DMA          0x00000800
> #define IORESOURCE_BUS          0x00001000
> 
> Notice that it's not an array of bits.
> 
> So this should be:
> 		if ((iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) == IORESOURCE_IO) {

What I've done for the Marvell PCIe driver is:

+	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, np) {
+		unsigned long restype = iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
+		if (restype == IORESOURCE_IO) {
[...]
+		if (restype == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
[...]

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property
  2013-03-23 13:37   ` Thomas Petazzoni
@ 2013-03-25 10:21     ` Andrew Murray
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Murray @ 2013-03-25 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Petazzoni
  Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, Jingoo Han, 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Bjorn Helgaas', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Thomas Abraham',
	linux-arm-kernel

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:37:04PM +0000, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2013 10:41:56 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 
> > Please look at how IORESOURCE_* stuff is defined:
> > #define IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS    0x00001f00      /* Resource type */
> > #define IORESOURCE_IO           0x00000100      /* PCI/ISA I/O ports */
> > #define IORESOURCE_MEM          0x00000200
> > #define IORESOURCE_REG          0x00000300      /* Register offsets */
> > #define IORESOURCE_IRQ          0x00000400
> > #define IORESOURCE_DMA          0x00000800
> > #define IORESOURCE_BUS          0x00001000
> > 
> > Notice that it's not an array of bits.
> > 
> > So this should be:
> > 		if ((iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS) == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> 
> What I've done for the Marvell PCIe driver is:
> 
> +	for_each_of_pci_range(&iter, np) {
> +		unsigned long restype = iter.flags & IORESOURCE_TYPE_BITS;
> +		if (restype == IORESOURCE_IO) {
> [...]
> +		if (restype == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
> [...]

OK I'll update this patch and also include Thierry's suggestions.

Andrew Murray

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-03-23  4:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-25 17:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2013-03-27  8:35     ` Jingoo Han
  2013-04-08  9:08   ` Jingoo Han
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2013-03-25 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham'

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:09:18PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

> +	pcie0@40000000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> +			0x290000 0x1000
> +			0x270000 0x1000
> +			0x271000 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> +	};

Can you send the lspci output so these bindings can be properly
reviewed? What PCI devices are internal to the SOC?

What is behind 'exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf' ? Is this a root port bridge
config space? What line is it in the lspci output? Can you include a
lspci -vv for it as well?

Your DT has overlapping bus-ranges, and two top level nodes. This is
going to require separate PCI domains in Linux.

However, based on your driver this HW looks similar to tegra, did you
review how tegra is setup? Merging all the ports into a single domain
is certainly preferred.

> +	pcie1@60000000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
> +			0x2a0000 0x1000
> +			0x272000 0x1000
> +			0x271040 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */

Do not include configuration space in ranges

> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */

Please confirm that an MMIO to 0x60200000 produces a PCI-E IO TLP to
address 0

> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */

Please check this, generally it should be:

			  0x82000000 0 0x60204000 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */

Reflecting an identity mapping for MMIO - eg MMIO access to 0x60204000
producse a PCI Memory TLP to address 0x60204000 - unless your hardware
is actually doing address translation (then there are other things to
confirm..)

It is usual to have an interrupt-map - have you tested that interrupts
resolve properly?

It looks like the INTx's should be routed by an interrupt-map to the
pulse pin. Consider an interrupt controller to decode the INT ABCD.

Regards,
Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos
  2013-03-23  4:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-26 21:33   ` Rob Herring
  2013-03-27  1:29     ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2013-03-26 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel,
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla', 'Andrew Murray',
	linux-arm-kernel

On 03/22/2013 11:07 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Exynos5440 has a PCIe controller which can be used as Root Complex.
> This driver supports a PCIe controller as Root Complex mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla <suren.reddy@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt        |   56 +
>  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |    5 +
>  drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
>  drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c                      | 1139 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 1201 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c

[...]

> +
> +/* synopsis specific PCIE configuration registers*/

If this is a standard IP block, then the driver naming should reflect
that. I suspect there are several others with the same IP block.

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos
  2013-03-26 21:33   ` Rob Herring
@ 2013-03-27  1:29     ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-27  1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Rob Herring'
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel,
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla', 'Andrew Murray',
	linux-arm-kernel, 'Jingoo Han'

On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 6:33 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> On 03/22/2013 11:07 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Exynos5440 has a PCIe controller which can be used as Root Complex.
> > This driver supports a PCIe controller as Root Complex mode.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla <suren.reddy@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Siva Reddy Kallam <siva.kallam@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt        |   56 +
> >  drivers/pci/host/Kconfig                           |    5 +
> >  drivers/pci/host/Makefile                          |    1 +
> >  drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c                      | 1139 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 1201 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/exynos-pcie.txt
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +
> > +/* synopsis specific PCIE configuration registers*/
> 
> If this is a standard IP block, then the driver naming should reflect
> that. I suspect there are several others with the same IP block.

Sorry, I don't think so.
Only core block is a standard IP block, other parts are Exynos-specific.
So, it is hard to share with other PCIe IPs using synopsis core.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> Rob


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-03-25 17:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2013-03-27  8:35     ` Jingoo Han
  2013-03-27 16:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-03-27  8:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jason Gunthorpe'
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

On Tuesday, March 26, 2013 2:05 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 01:09:18PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> 
> > +	pcie0@40000000 {
> > +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> > +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> > +			0x290000 0x1000
> > +			0x270000 0x1000
> > +			0x271000 0x40>;
> > +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> > +		#address-cells = <3>;
> > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > +		device_type = "pci";
> > +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> > +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> > +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> > +	};
> 
> Can you send the lspci output so these bindings can be properly
> reviewed? What PCI devices are internal to the SOC?
> 
> What is behind 'exynos_pcie_wr_own_conf' ? Is this a root port bridge
> config space? What line is it in the lspci output? Can you include a
> lspci -vv for it as well?

Hi Jason Gunthorpe,
Thank you for your comment :)

Here is the lspci -vv output.
I tested Exynos PCIe with e1000e lan card.

00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
        I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff
        Memory behind bridge: 40300000-403fffff
        Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 40400000-404fffff
        Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
        BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
                PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
        Capabilities: <access denied>
        Kernel driver in use: pcieport

01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection
        Subsystem: Intel Corporation Gigabit CT Desktop Adapter
        Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 53
        Region 0: Memory at 40380000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
        Region 1: Memory at 40300000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K]
        Region 2: I/O ports at 40200000 [disabled] [size=32]
        Region 3: Memory at 403a0000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
        [virtual] Expansion ROM at 40400000 [disabled] [size=256K]
        Capabilities: <access denied>
        Kernel driver in use: e1000e

10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
        Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
        Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
        Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
        Bus: primary=10, secondary=11, subordinate=11, sec-latency=0
        Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
        BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
                PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
        Capabilities: <access denied>
        Kernel driver in use: pcieport



> 
> Your DT has overlapping bus-ranges, and two top level nodes. This is
> going to require separate PCI domains in Linux.
> 
> However, based on your driver this HW looks similar to tegra, did you
> review how tegra is setup? Merging all the ports into a single domain
> is certainly preferred.

In Tegra case, the address of IO control register is same.
+	pcie-controller {
+		compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pcie";
+		reg = <0x80003000 0x00000800   /* PADS registers */
+		       0x80003800 0x00000200   /* AFI registers */
+		       0x81000000 0x01000000   /* configuration space */
+		       0x90000000 0x10000000>; /* extended configuration space */

But, in Exynos case, address of IP control register is different
between PCIe0 and PCIe1.

+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
+			0x290000 0x1000
+			0x270000 0x1000
+			0x271000 0x40>;

+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
+			0x2a0000 0x1000
+			0x272000 0x1000
+			0x271040 0x40>;


> 
> > +	pcie1@60000000 {
> > +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> > +		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
> > +			0x2a0000 0x1000
> > +			0x272000 0x1000
> > +			0x271040 0x40>;
> > +		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
> > +		#address-cells = <3>;
> > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > +		device_type = "pci";
> > +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> > +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> 
> Do not include configuration space in ranges

How can I include configuration space?
Please let me know kindly :)

> 
> > +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> 
> Please confirm that an MMIO to 0x60200000 produces a PCI-E IO TLP to
> address 0
> 
> > +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> 
> Please check this, generally it should be:
> 
> 			  0x82000000 0 0x60204000 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> 
> Reflecting an identity mapping for MMIO - eg MMIO access to 0x60204000
> producse a PCI Memory TLP to address 0x60204000 - unless your hardware
> is actually doing address translation (then there are other things to
> confirm..)

OK, I will change it.

> 
> It is usual to have an interrupt-map - have you tested that interrupts
> resolve properly?

There is no problem about interrupts.
However, I will consider an interrupt-map.

> 
> It looks like the INTx's should be routed by an interrupt-map to the
> pulse pin. Consider an interrupt controller to decode the INT ABCD.
> 
> Regards,
> Jason


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-03-27  8:35     ` Jingoo Han
@ 2013-03-27 16:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2013-03-27 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham'

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:35:48PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

> Here is the lspci -vv output.
> I tested Exynos PCIe with e1000e lan card.
> 
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
>         Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
>         Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>         Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 64 bytes
>         Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
>         I/O behind bridge: 00000000-00000fff
>         Memory behind bridge: 40300000-403fffff
>         Prefetchable memory behind bridge: 40400000-404fffff
>         Secondary status: 66MHz- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- <SERR- <PERR-
>         BridgeCtl: Parity+ SERR- NoISA- VGA- MAbort- >Reset- FastB2B-
>                 PriDiscTmr- SecDiscTmr- DiscTmrStat- DiscTmrSERREn-
>         Capabilities: <access denied>
>         Kernel driver in use: pcieport

This is very similar to tegra, you should try to follow the same path
as Thierry did.

Basically, have only one PCI host from Linux's perspective. This means
the driver only calls pci_create_root_bus once. The driver makes all
the ports available under that single root_bus. It does this by
routing the config access to the four different MMIO config regions
depending on the bus number and device number.

When done, lspci should look something like this:

 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
 00:02.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

Notice the bus number of both root port bridges is 0. This is now
compliant with the PCI-E specification for root complex behavior. Bus
0 is the root complex bus.

The driver can then use this information in the bridges:
>         Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
To route config transactions for bus != 0 to the proper port and
correctly generate type 0 or type 1 config TLPs.

I hope this makes sense. Tegra's implementation is very close to this,
but the bus != 0 case will be more like Marvell. (If I read your
driver right)

> 10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01)
> (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

There is something funny here, this is bus 0x10, but your bindings had
bus-range 0 -> 0xf on both nodes.

> > However, based on your driver this HW looks similar to tegra, did you
> > review how tegra is setup? Merging all the ports into a single domain
> > is certainly preferred.
> 
> In Tegra case, the address of IO control register is same.
> +	pcie-controller {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra20-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x80003000 0x00000800   /* PADS registers */
> +		       0x80003800 0x00000200   /* AFI registers */
> +		       0x81000000 0x01000000   /* configuration space */
> +		       0x90000000 0x10000000>; /* extended configuration space */
>
> But, in Exynos case, address of IP control register is different
> between PCIe0 and PCIe1.

tegra has both shared registers and per-port registers. The ones above
are shared.

This message has the final DT bindings for the Marvell and tegra
cases:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/21209

The per-port registers are being passed to the driver here:

   	     pci@1,0 {
 	     	      device_type = "pci";
 		      assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x80000000 0 0x1000>;
                      reg = <0x000800 0 0 0 0>;

via assigned-addresses.

Marvell has no shared registers, you can see in its binding they are
all passed through assigned-addresses.

Also, the above DT nodes is representing the root port bridge PCI
device. In your case it would be this:

 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

0x800 is the DT encoding of 00:01.0

> > > +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > 
> > Do not include configuration space in ranges
> 
> How can I include configuration space?
> Please let me know kindly :)

There is no need to specify configuration space at all. If you copied
this from an older tegra binding it was an early way to try and define
per-port registers. After discussion the use of assigned-addresses was
choosen instead.
 
> > It is usual to have an interrupt-map - have you tested that interrupts
> > resolve properly?
>
> There is no problem about interrupts.

I see, you have exynos_pcie_map_irq in code. interrupt-map replaces
that functionality in a standard way, and is more capable for edge
cases.

> However, I will consider an interrupt-map.

You can copy the interrupt-map style from the Marvell driver, which
seems like it matches your case..

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-03-23  4:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Jingoo Han
  2013-03-25 17:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2013-04-08  9:08   ` Jingoo Han
  2013-04-08 16:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-04-08  9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jason Gunthorpe'
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding', 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	'Jingoo Han'

On Saturday, March 23, 2013 1:09 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> 
> Exynos5440 has two PCIe controllers which can be used as root complex
> for PCIe interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts |    8 +++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi         |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
> index a21eb4c..746f9fc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440-ssdk5440.dts
> @@ -34,4 +34,12 @@
>  			clock-frequency = <50000000>;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	pcie0@40000000 {
> +		reset-gpio = <5>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pcie1@60000000 {
> +		reset-gpio = <22>;
> +	};
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
> index c374a31..41b2d2c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5440.dtsi
> @@ -178,4 +178,36 @@
>  		clocks = <&clock 21>;
>  		clock-names = "rtc";
>  	};
> +
> +	pcie0@40000000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> +			0x290000 0x1000
> +			0x270000 0x1000
> +			0x271000 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> +	};
> +
> +	pcie1@60000000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
> +			0x2a0000 0x1000
> +			0x272000 0x1000
> +			0x271040 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		bus-range = <0x0 0xf>;
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> +	};

Hi Jason,

I have a question.
Now, I am reviewing the Tegra PCIe, Marvell PCIe patchset.
However, in the case of Exynos PCIe,
'downstream I/O' and 'non-prefetchable memory' are different between PCIe0 and PCIe1.
These regions are not shared.

PCIe0:
	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */

PCIe1:
	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */

PCIe0 uses 0x40000000~0x5fffffff, PCI1 uses 0x60000000~0x7fffffff.

How can I handle this? :)
The following is right?

+       pcie-controller {
		.....
+               ranges = <0x82000000 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 0 registers */
+                         0x82000000 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 1 registers */
+                         0x81000000 0 0          0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 0 downstream I/O */
+                         0x81000000 0 0          0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 1 downstream I/O */
+                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 0 non-prefetchable memory */
+                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 1 non-prefetchable memory */
+
+               pci@1,0 {
+                       device_type = "pci";
+                       assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x40000000 0 0x00200000
+                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40200000 0 0x00004000
+                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>;
		.....
+               pci@2,0 {
+                       device_type = "pci";
+                       assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x60000000 0 0x00200000
+                                                 0x81000800 0 0x60200000 0 0x00004000
+                                                 0x81000800 0 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>;

Best regards,
Jingoo Han


>  };
> --
> 1.7.2.5



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-04-08  9:08   ` Jingoo Han
@ 2013-04-08 16:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2013-06-07  9:19       ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2013-04-08 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham'

On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:08:53PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:

> I have a question.  Now, I am reviewing the Tegra PCIe, Marvell PCIe
> patchset.  However, in the case of Exynos PCIe, 'downstream I/O' and
> 'non-prefetchable memory' are different between PCIe0 and PCIe1.
> These regions are not shared.
> 
> PCIe0:
> 	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> 		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> 		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> 
> PCIe1:
> 	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> 		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> 		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> 
> PCIe0 uses 0x40000000~0x5fffffff, PCI1 uses 0x60000000~0x7fffffff.
> 
> How can I handle this? :)

You need to dig into where this range restriction comes from, and how
it interacts with the PCI-E root bridge's window registers. Is there
another set of registers that control this? Is it hardwired into the
silicon? Do the root port window registers control this? 

I'm looking at functions like exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound
and wondering if the driver already controls this window.. But it
looks like there may be some restrictions.

Marvell also has unshared regions, but the driver arranges for those
ranges to be setup dynamically based on writes to the bridge's window
registers from the Linux PCI core, so the region is always in sync
with what the Linux PCI core is trying to do.

The desired perfect outcome is to have a single logical 'shared'
region for memory and I/O - give that region to the PCI core via
struct resources, then the PCI core tells the driver and HW what
portion of that region belongs to each root port via a write to the
root port bridge's window registers. The net result is still
non-overlapping regions, but the allocation of space between port 0
and port 1 is performed at run time.

I don't really know enough about your hardware to give you better
advice, sorry. The general guidance to try and follow the PCI-E spec
for a root complex is good, but if the HW can't do it, or it would
make the driver too complex, then one PCI domain per port will always
work (this is similar to your original driver, but with domains).

The main advantage to following the PCI-E specs and allowing for
dynamic allocation of address space is that it lets you reserve less
address space for PCI-E, and this in turn gives you more low mem
address space to use for DRAM.

> The following is right?
 
> +       pcie-controller {
> 		.....
> +               ranges = <0x82000000 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 0 registers */
> +                         0x82000000 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 1 registers */
> +                         0x81000000 0 0          0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 0 downstream I/O */
> +                         0x81000000 0 0          0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 1 downstream I/O */
> +                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 0 non-prefetchable memory */
> +                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 1 non-prefetchable memory */


> +
> +               pci@1,0 {
> +                       device_type = "pci";
> +                       assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x40000000 0 0x00200000
> +                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40200000 0 0x00004000
> +                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>;

Would be:

                       ranges = <0x81000800 0 0x40200000  0x81000800 0 0x40200000  0 0x00004000
                                 0x81000800 0 0x40204000  0x81000800 0 0x40204000  0 0x10000000>;
                       assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x40000000  0 0x00200000>;

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-04-08 16:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2013-06-07  9:19       ` Jingoo Han
  2013-06-07 11:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-06-07  9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Jason Gunthorpe'
  Cc: 'Kukjin Kim', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-pci, devicetree-discuss,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely',
	'Andrew Murray', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	'Thierry Reding',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	'Siva Reddy Kallam', 'Thomas Abraham',
	Jingoo Han

On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 1:56 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:08:53PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> 
> > I have a question.  Now, I am reviewing the Tegra PCIe, Marvell PCIe
> > patchset.  However, in the case of Exynos PCIe, 'downstream I/O' and
> > 'non-prefetchable memory' are different between PCIe0 and PCIe1.
> > These regions are not shared.
> >
> > PCIe0:
> > 	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > 		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> > 		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> >
> > PCIe1:
> > 	ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > 		  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> > 		  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> >
> > PCIe0 uses 0x40000000~0x5fffffff, PCI1 uses 0x60000000~0x7fffffff.
> >
> > How can I handle this? :)
> 
> You need to dig into where this range restriction comes from, and how
> it interacts with the PCI-E root bridge's window registers. Is there
> another set of registers that control this? Is it hardwired into the
> silicon? Do the root port window registers control this?
> 
> I'm looking at functions like exynos_pcie_prog_viewport_mem_outbound
> and wondering if the driver already controls this window.. But it
> looks like there may be some restrictions.
> 
> Marvell also has unshared regions, but the driver arranges for those
> ranges to be setup dynamically based on writes to the bridge's window
> registers from the Linux PCI core, so the region is always in sync
> with what the Linux PCI core is trying to do.
> 
> The desired perfect outcome is to have a single logical 'shared'
> region for memory and I/O - give that region to the PCI core via
> struct resources, then the PCI core tells the driver and HW what
> portion of that region belongs to each root port via a write to the
> root port bridge's window registers. The net result is still
> non-overlapping regions, but the allocation of space between port 0
> and port 1 is performed at run time.
> 
> I don't really know enough about your hardware to give you better
> advice, sorry. The general guidance to try and follow the PCI-E spec
> for a root complex is good, but if the HW can't do it, or it would
> make the driver too complex, then one PCI domain per port will always
> work (this is similar to your original driver, but with domains).
> 
> The main advantage to following the PCI-E specs and allowing for
> dynamic allocation of address space is that it lets you reserve less
> address space for PCI-E, and this in turn gives you more low mem
> address space to use for DRAM.

Hi Jason Gunthorpe,

I implemented 'Single domain' with Exynos PCIe for last two months;
however, it cannot work properly due to the hardware restriction.
Each MEM region is hard-wired.

Thus, I will send Exynos PCIe V3 patch as 'Separate domains'.

Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> > The following is right?
> 
> > +       pcie-controller {
> > 		.....
> > +               ranges = <0x82000000 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 0 registers */
> > +                         0x82000000 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* port 1 registers */
> > +                         0x81000000 0 0          0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 0 downstream I/O */
> > +                         0x81000000 0 0          0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* port 1 downstream I/O */
> > +                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 0 non-prefetchable
> memory */
> > +                         0x82000000 0 0x40204000 0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* port 1 non-prefetchable
> memory */
> 
> 
> > +
> > +               pci@1,0 {
> > +                       device_type = "pci";
> > +                       assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x40000000 0 0x00200000
> > +                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40200000 0 0x00004000
> > +                                                 0x81000800 0 0x40204000 0 0x10000000>;
> 
> Would be:
> 
>                        ranges = <0x81000800 0 0x40200000  0x81000800 0 0x40200000  0 0x00004000
>                                  0x81000800 0 0x40204000  0x81000800 0 0x40204000  0 0x10000000>;
>                        assigned-addresses = <0x82000800 0 0x40000000  0 0x00200000>;
> 
> Jason


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-07  9:19       ` Jingoo Han
@ 2013-06-07 11:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
  2013-06-07 16:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-06-07 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: Jingoo Han, 'Jason Gunthorpe', 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray'

On Friday 07 June 2013 18:19:40 Jingoo Han wrote:
> Hi Jason Gunthorpe,
> 
> I implemented 'Single domain' with Exynos PCIe for last two months;
> however, it cannot work properly due to the hardware restriction.
> Each MEM region is hard-wired.
> 
> Thus, I will send Exynos PCIe V3 patch as 'Separate domains'.

Yes, I think that is best, if the hardware is clearly designed as
separate domains, this is what we should do by default in the
driver. For the Marvell case with its 10 separate ports, much
more address space would be wasted by having one domain per
port and that hardware let us work around it by remapping the
physical address space windows. For Exynos there is much less to
lose and I too cannot see how it would be done in the first
place.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-07 11:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-06-07 16:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2013-06-07 17:43             ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2013-06-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Jingoo Han, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray'

On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 01:59:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2013 18:19:40 Jingoo Han wrote:
> > Hi Jason Gunthorpe,
> > 
> > I implemented 'Single domain' with Exynos PCIe for last two months;
> > however, it cannot work properly due to the hardware restriction.
> > Each MEM region is hard-wired.
> > 
> > Thus, I will send Exynos PCIe V3 patch as 'Separate domains'.
> 
> Yes, I think that is best, if the hardware is clearly designed as
> separate domains, this is what we should do by default in the
> driver. For the Marvell case with its 10 separate ports, much
> more address space would be wasted by having one domain per
> port and that hardware let us work around it by remapping the
> physical address space windows. For Exynos there is much less to
> lose and I too cannot see how it would be done in the first
> place.

Sounds fair to me.

But when we talk about multiple domains we don't mean a disjoint range
bus bus numbers, as your other email shows:

00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

We mean multiple domains, it should look like this:

0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

ie lspci -D.

Each domain gets a unique bus number range, config space, io range,
etc. This is much clearer to everyone than trying to pretend there is
only one domain when the HW is actually multi-domain.

Jason

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-07 16:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2013-06-07 17:43             ` Arnd Bergmann
  2013-06-10  8:38               ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-06-07 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Jingoo Han, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray'

On Friday 07 June 2013, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Sounds fair to me.
> 
> But when we talk about multiple domains we don't mean a disjoint range
> bus bus numbers, as your other email shows:
> 
> 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> 10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> 
> We mean multiple domains, it should look like this:
> 
> 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> 
> ie lspci -D.
> 
> Each domain gets a unique bus number range, config space, io range,
> etc. This is much clearer to everyone than trying to pretend there is
> only one domain when the HW is actually multi-domain.

Yes, absolutely. This means we also don't need a bus-range property in DT, since each
domain will allow all 255 buses.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-07 17:43             ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-06-10  8:38               ` Jingoo Han
  2013-06-10 15:22                 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-06-10  8:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Arnd Bergmann', 'Jason Gunthorpe'
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray',
	Jingoo Han

On Saturday, June 08, 2013 2:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2013, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Sounds fair to me.
> >
> > But when we talk about multiple domains we don't mean a disjoint range
> > bus bus numbers, as your other email shows:
> >
> > 00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> > 10:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> >
> > We mean multiple domains, it should look like this:
> >
> > 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> > 0001:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
> >
> > ie lspci -D.
> >
> > Each domain gets a unique bus number range, config space, io range,
> > etc. This is much clearer to everyone than trying to pretend there is
> > only one domain when the HW is actually multi-domain.
> 
> Yes, absolutely. This means we also don't need a bus-range property in DT, since each
> domain will allow all 255 buses.

After removing a bus-range property in DT, it looks like:

00:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])
02:00.0 PCI bridge: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device a549 (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [Normal decode])

For multiple domains, how can I fix the DT properties?

Current DT properties are as below:

+	pcie0@40000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
+			0x290000 0x1000
+			0x270000 0x1000
+			0x271000 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
+		#address-cells = <3>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};
+
+	pcie1@60000000 {
+		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
+		reg = <0x60000000 0x4000
+			0x2a0000 0x1000
+			0x272000 0x1000
+			0x271040 0x40>;
+		interrupts = <0 23 0>, <0 24 0>, <0 25 0>;
+		#address-cells = <3>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		device_type = "pci";
+		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
+			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x60200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
+			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x60204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
+	};



Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> 	Arnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-10  8:38               ` Jingoo Han
@ 2013-06-10 15:22                 ` Arnd Bergmann
  2013-06-11  6:00                   ` Jingoo Han
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-06-10 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-arm-kernel, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray'

On Monday 10 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Saturday, June 08, 2013 2:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> For multiple domains, how can I fix the DT properties?

Domains are a Linux concept, you have to pick a new domain number for each
struct hw_pci you register.
 
> Current DT properties are as below:
> 
> +	pcie0@40000000 {
> +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> +			0x290000 0x1000
> +			0x270000 0x1000
> +			0x271000 0x40>;
> +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> +		#address-cells = <3>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		device_type = "pci";
> +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> +	};

An unrelated comment: your first "reg" field seems to overlap with part
of your configuration space. Is that intentional?

Also, shouldn't your memory space end on a 256MB boundary, rather than
extend up to 0x50203fff?

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-10 15:22                 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-06-11  6:00                   ` Jingoo Han
  2013-06-12 15:10                     ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2013-06-11  6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Arnd Bergmann'
  Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-arm-kernel, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray',
	Jingoo Han

On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 12:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 10 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 08, 2013 2:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > For multiple domains, how can I fix the DT properties?
> 
> Domains are a Linux concept, you have to pick a new domain number for each
> struct hw_pci you register.

Hi Arnd,

Thank you for your reply.
It is very helpful. :)

I will set domain numbers for each struct hw_pci.

> 
> > Current DT properties are as below:
> >
> > +	pcie0@40000000 {
> > +		compatible = "samsung,exynos5440-pcie";
> > +		reg = <0x40000000 0x4000
> > +			0x290000 0x1000
> > +			0x270000 0x1000
> > +			0x271000 0x40>;
> > +		interrupts = <0 20 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
> > +		#address-cells = <3>;
> > +		#size-cells = <2>;
> > +		device_type = "pci";
> > +		ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > +			  0x81000000 0 0	  0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> > +			  0x82000000 0 0	  0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> > +	};
> 
> An unrelated comment: your first "reg" field seems to overlap with part
> of your configuration space. Is that intentional?

Yes, intentional.
But, I will try to remove it.

> 
> Also, shouldn't your memory space end on a 256MB boundary, rather than
> extend up to 0x50203fff?

According to the manual of Exynos PCIe, each memory space for Exynos PCIe
can support 512MB, including I/O, CFG regions.

Is there any problem when over 256MB boundary is used?
Please let me know. :)


Best regards,
Jingoo Han

> 
> 	Arnd


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC
  2013-06-11  6:00                   ` Jingoo Han
@ 2013-06-12 15:10                     ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-06-12 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jingoo Han
  Cc: 'Jason Gunthorpe',
	linux-arm-kernel, 'Thomas Petazzoni',
	linux-samsung-soc, 'Siva Reddy Kallam',
	'Surendranath Gurivireddy Balla',
	linux-pci, devicetree-discuss, 'Thierry Reding',
	linux-kernel, 'Grant Likely', 'Kukjin Kim',
	'Thomas Abraham', 'Bjorn Helgaas',
	'Andrew Murray'

On Tuesday 11 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > +           ranges = <0x00000800 0 0x40000000 0x40000000 0 0x00200000   /* configuration space */
> > > +                     0x81000000 0 0          0x40200000 0 0x00004000   /* downstream I/O */
> > > +                     0x82000000 0 0          0x40204000 0 0x10000000>; /* non-prefetchable memory */
> > > +   };
> > 
> ...
> > Also, shouldn't your memory space end on a 256MB boundary, rather than
> > extend up to 0x50203fff?
> 
> According to the manual of Exynos PCIe, each memory space for Exynos PCIe
> can support 512MB, including I/O, CFG regions.
> 
> Is there any problem when over 256MB boundary is used?
> Please let me know. :)

No, that's not a problem, but I think you should have the window span
the entire space that is provided in hardware. If there are 512 MB total, why
not use them?

You could use 

	ranges = <0x82000000 0 0          0x40204000 0 0x1fdfc000>;

to pass a range for the memory space that extends all the way until
0x5fffffff.

	Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-12 15:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-23  4:04 [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Jingoo Han
2013-03-23  4:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] of/pci: Add of_pci_parse_bus_range() function Jingoo Han
2013-03-23  4:06 ` [PATCH 3/6] pci: infrastructure to add drivers in drivers/pci/host Jingoo Han
2013-03-23  4:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] pci: Add PCIe driver for Samsung Exynos Jingoo Han
2013-03-26 21:33   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-27  1:29     ` Jingoo Han
2013-03-23  4:08 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: EXYNOS: Enable PCIe support for Exynos5440 Jingoo Han
2013-03-23  4:09 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: dts: Add pcie controller node for Samsung EXYNOS5440 SoC Jingoo Han
2013-03-25 17:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-03-27  8:35     ` Jingoo Han
2013-03-27 16:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-04-08  9:08   ` Jingoo Han
2013-04-08 16:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07  9:19       ` Jingoo Han
2013-06-07 11:59         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-07 16:20           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-07 17:43             ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-10  8:38               ` Jingoo Han
2013-06-10 15:22                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-11  6:00                   ` Jingoo Han
2013-06-12 15:10                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-23 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] of/pci: Provide support for parsing PCI DT ranges property Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-23 13:37   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-25 10:21     ` Andrew Murray

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).