Re: [PATCH] docs: security: Confidential computing intro and threat model

[Carlos Bilbao <carlos.bilbao@amd.com>]

On 4/27/23 10:18 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
>> On 4/27/23 7:29 AM, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
>>> I agree with Dave that I think the goal of this document is not to come up with a
>>> fancy name (I am fine with call it anything), but to introduce kernel developers to the 
>>> new Linux threat model angle for this-particular-use-case-of-confidential-computing.
>>> So that when we submit the hardening mechanisms in the future people are 
>>> already familiar with why we need to do this and we don’t have to repeat this story 
>>> again and again. 
>>
>> Yes! To reiterate, there's two things we definitely wish to do:
>>
>> 1. Narrow down the problem: This new document can be specific to CoCo in
>>    virtual environments. v2 should be clear about that.
> 
> Then rename the document as I already suggested.  If you want to claim
> confidential-computing.rst, then IMO such a doc needs to be written something
> like the surprisingly good Wikipedia article[*].  Until one of those two things
> happens, my NAK stands.
> 
> [*] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidential_computing

That's "mea culpa". I should have made it clearer in my previous emails that
changing the name is a non-issue. Also that we are very interested in
feedback from other CoCo flavors. In this regard, we've reached out to ARM
and RISC-V folks. Hopefully, they help us improve the doc and we can add
them as maintainers. Whenever we have a v2, I'd like to CC people from CSP
sector (Oracle, etc.) as well.

Thanks,
Carlos