From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@umn.edu>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@umn.edu>,
Stephen McCamant <smccaman@umn.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:42:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <074dfd38-dc1d-3795-ab75-a17c24b36844@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <954c5d70-742f-7b0e-57ad-ea967e93be89@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> You're also not consistent - strlen() is not annotated.
Would you like to integrate any additional function annotations?
> And, for the standard C functions, -Wall already seems to warn about
> an unused call:
This detail is nice, isn't it?
> a.c:5:2: warning: statement with no effect [-Wunused-value]
> strlen(s);
Are there any differences to consider for the Linux function variant?
> The problem is the __must_check does not mean that the
> return value must be followed by a comparison to NULL and bailing out
> (that can't really be checked), it simply ensures the return value is
> assigned somewhere or used in an if(). So foo->bar = kstrdup() not
> followed by a check of foo->bar won't warn. So one would essentially
> only catch instant-leaks.
How do you think about to improve the source code analysis support
any further?
Regards,
Markus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-09 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-09 12:14 [PATCH] string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check Markus Elfring
2019-10-09 13:26 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-09 13:56 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-09 14:21 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-09 14:30 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-09 16:31 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-09 18:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-10-10 7:20 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2019-10-09 16:37 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-09 16:42 ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2019-10-11 5:15 ` Searching for missing variable checks Markus Elfring
2019-10-09 15:09 ` [PATCH] string.h: Mark 34 functions with __must_check Steven Rostedt
2019-10-09 16:13 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-09 16:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-10-09 16:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-09 17:04 ` Markus Elfring
2019-10-09 17:33 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-09 18:06 ` Markus Elfring
2019-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH] " Joe Perches
2019-10-09 17:33 ` Nick Desaulniers
2019-10-10 14:27 ` David Sterba
2019-10-10 14:34 ` Joe Perches
2019-10-11 5:00 ` Markus Elfring
2019-10-10 15:46 ` [PATCH] " David Laight
2019-10-09 20:06 ` Markus Elfring
2019-10-10 5:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-10-10 7:25 ` Markus Elfring
2019-12-21 9:30 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=074dfd38-dc1d-3795-ab75-a17c24b36844@web.de \
--to=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=emamd001@umn.edu \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=pakki001@umn.edu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=smccaman@umn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).