From: Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"mlord@pobox.com" <mlord@pobox.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net 2/2] r8152: rx descriptor check
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:05:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB201050063@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161115011044.GA13220@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Francois Romieu [mailto:romieu@fr.zoreil.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 9:11 AM
[...]
> If it was possible to get it wrong once, it should be possible to
> get it wrong twice, especially if some part of the hardware design
> is recycled. I don't mean anything else.
I agree with you. However, I have to let it could be reproduced
for confirming it.
Besides, the behavior is different for PCIe and USB device. There
is no action of DMA for USB device. It is done by the USB host
controller. And, the USB host controller wouldn't allow the device
sends a data which is more than the size of the buffer.
Best Regards,
Hayes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-11 7:15 [PATCH net 0/2] r8152: rx patches Hayes Wang
2016-11-11 7:15 ` [PATCH net 1/2] r8152: fix the sw rx checksum is unavailable Hayes Wang
2016-11-17 3:36 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-17 14:14 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-17 14:25 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <d683c019-4e0f-6fe6-368c-c4fc86c72fe6@pobox.com>
2016-11-18 7:57 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-18 12:03 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-22 13:12 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-23 3:52 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-23 13:41 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-23 15:12 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-23 19:29 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 3:24 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-24 12:31 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 13:26 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-24 15:24 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 6:11 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-25 12:36 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 16:21 ` David Miller
2016-11-24 16:43 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 17:00 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 17:13 ` David Miller
2016-11-24 17:11 ` David Miller
2016-11-24 18:34 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 18:49 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 19:00 ` Greg KH
2016-11-24 19:10 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 19:17 ` Greg KH
2016-11-25 9:52 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-25 13:32 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 0:27 ` Francois Romieu
2016-11-25 3:49 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 9:53 ` Greg KH
2016-11-25 12:34 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 12:41 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 14:22 ` Greg KH
2016-11-25 14:35 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 12:49 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 14:24 ` Greg KH
2016-11-25 16:58 ` David Miller
2016-11-30 11:58 ` Hayes Wang
2016-12-09 3:23 ` Hayes Wang
2016-12-09 13:05 ` Mark Lord
2017-01-01 0:07 ` Ansis Atteka
2017-01-03 0:40 ` Ansis Atteka
2017-01-03 13:19 ` Mark Lord
2017-01-09 7:58 ` Hayes Wang
2019-01-05 14:14 ` r8152: data corruption in various scenarios Mark Lord
2019-01-05 14:22 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-06 19:14 ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-01-06 21:13 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-06 21:16 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-07 3:53 ` Hayes Wang
2019-01-07 16:01 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-01-07 18:06 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-07 18:27 ` Mario.Limonciello
2019-01-07 19:24 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-07 4:09 ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-01-07 4:13 ` Mark Lord
2019-01-07 6:46 ` Kai Heng Feng
2019-01-07 7:01 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 18:42 ` [PATCH net 1/2] r8152: fix the sw rx checksum is unavailable Greg KH
2016-11-24 18:58 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-25 6:31 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-25 6:51 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-25 12:35 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-24 16:19 ` David Miller
2016-11-24 12:37 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-11 7:15 ` [PATCH net 2/2] r8152: rx descriptor check Hayes Wang
2016-11-11 12:13 ` Francois Romieu
2016-11-12 13:21 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-14 6:43 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-15 1:10 ` Francois Romieu
2016-11-17 3:05 ` Hayes Wang [this message]
2016-11-13 17:39 ` David Miller
2016-11-13 20:34 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-13 20:38 ` Mark Lord
2016-11-14 7:23 ` Hayes Wang
2016-11-14 17:27 ` David Miller
2016-11-14 7:03 ` Hayes Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB201050063@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw \
--to=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlord@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).