From: mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: "Christian A. Ehrhardt" <lk@c--e.de>,
niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: This is the fourth time I've tried to find what led to the regression of outgoing network speed and each time I find the merge commit 8c94ccc7cd691472461448f98e2372c75849406c
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 22:08:20 +0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <098670097a6fd59f3e254c5294882f3fa12e3c65.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0gz9jxp.ffs@tglx>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1429 bytes --]
On Mon, 2024-02-26 at 19:09 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> we don't have any information about the overall workload,
During measurements nothing was running except iperf3
> other interrupt sources on CPU0 and their frequency. That'd need to
> be investigated with instrumentation and might unearth some
> completely different underlying reason causing this behavior.
I made simple bash script for benchmark enp14s0 on each of CPU core.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
for i in {0..31}
do
smp_affinity=$(echo 'obase=16; '$((2 ** i)) | bc)
echo "echo $smp_affinity > /proc/irq/84/smp_affinity"
echo $smp_affinity > /proc/irq/84/smp_affinity
echo 'iperf3 -c primary-ws.local -t 5 -p 5000 -P 1'
iperf3 -c primary-ws.local -t 5 -p 5000 -P 1
done
And attach here results of iperf3 for kernels 6.7.0 and 6.8.0-rc6.
Which once again makes sure that CPU0 is a bad option in both cases.
And any other CPU does not necessarily 23 allow the network interface
to operate at the limit of the capabilities of the network cable.
I also attach /proc/interrupts I hope this helps clear things up.
I don't know how else to help you. What information to provide.
About repeatability my "unlucky" scenario.
I have two MSI MPG B650I EDGE WIFI motherboards and this problem
happened both at the same time.
It seems the problem has always been there, we just never noticed it.
--
Best Regards,
Mike Gavrilov.
[-- Attachment #2: benchmarking-6.7.0-all-cores.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 2152 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: benchmarking-6.8.0-0.rc6-all-cores.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 2282 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #4: proc-interrupts.zip --]
[-- Type: application/zip, Size: 2882 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-03 1:02 This is the fourth time I’ve tried to find what led to the regression of outgoing network speed and each time I find the merge commit 8c94ccc7cd691472461448f98e2372c75849406c Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-03 1:08 ` Rahul Rameshbabu
2024-02-03 1:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-02-03 1:16 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-02-03 2:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-02-03 18:20 ` Christian A. Ehrhardt
2024-02-04 20:47 ` Christian A. Ehrhardt
2024-02-05 21:08 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-06 11:26 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-06 16:12 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-07 10:40 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-07 11:55 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-08 9:25 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-08 10:32 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-08 15:43 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-16 6:15 ` This is the fourth time Iâve " Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-19 9:41 ` This is the fourth time I’ve " Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-20 23:19 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-02-20 23:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-02-20 23:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-02-21 13:44 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-26 5:45 ` This is the fourth time I've " Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-26 9:24 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-26 9:51 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-26 10:54 ` Mathias Nyman
2024-02-26 18:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-27 17:08 ` mikhail.v.gavrilov [this message]
2024-02-27 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <960fd112b294a902e1bea1fdd8e04a708a05cf45.camel@gmail.com>
2024-02-29 9:41 ` Mikhail Gavrilov
2024-03-04 14:10 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-02-21 6:48 ` This is the fourth time I’ve " Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=098670097a6fd59f3e254c5294882f3fa12e3c65.camel@gmail.com \
--to=mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lk@c--e.de \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.neronin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).