linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
To: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty: serial: use uart_port_tx_limit() helper
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:27:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a1f4ce9-4158-b8ab-1837-68da06f20407@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220411115141.o2i3rlfcyzg6qlnz@pali>

On 11. 04. 22, 13:51, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 11 April 2022 12:54:05 Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> uart_port_tx_limit() is a new helper to send characters to the device.
>> Use it in these drivers.
>>
>> It means we have to define two new uart hooks: tx_ready() and put_char()
>> to do the real job now.
>>
>> And mux.c also needs to define tx_done(). But I'm not sure if the driver
>> really wants to wait for all the characters to dismiss from the HW fifo
>> at this code point. Hence I marked this as FIXME.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
>> Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
>> Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
>> Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
>> Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/tty/serial/21285.c           | 40 +++++++--------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/altera_jtaguart.c | 43 ++++++----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl010.c      | 40 ++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/apbuart.c         | 37 ++++---------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/bcm63xx_uart.c    | 48 ++++++-------------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/mux.c             | 48 ++++++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c      | 47 +++++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c     | 53 +++++++---------------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/pxa.c             | 43 +++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/rp2.c             | 36 ++++++-------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/serial_txx9.c     | 40 ++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/sifive.c          | 48 ++++---------------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c     | 41 ++++-----------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/st-asc.c          | 51 ++++----------------------
>>   drivers/tty/serial/vr41xx_siu.c      | 42 ++++------------------
>>   15 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 514 deletions(-)
> ...
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c
>> index 0429c2a54290..3d07ab9eb15e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mvebu-uart.c
>> @@ -194,6 +194,16 @@ static unsigned int mvebu_uart_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port)
>>   	return (st & STAT_TX_EMP) ? TIOCSER_TEMT : 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool mvebu_uart_tx_ready(struct uart_port *port)
>> +{
>> +	return !(readl(port->membase + UART_STAT) & STAT_TX_FIFO_FUL);
> 
> mvebu-uart.c driver in its tx_ready function should probably use
> STAT_TX_RDY macro (access to STAT_TX_RDY bit in register).
> 
> Documentation for UART1 (STD) about this bit says:
> 
> This bit is set when TRANS_HLD (our UART_TSH macro) is empty and ready
> for the CPU to write the next character to be transmitted out. The TSR
> can still shift out the previous character when this bit is set. This
> bit is cleared when the CPU writes to TRANS_HLD.
> 
> For UART2 (EXT) there is just information: UART Tx Ready for 1 Byte
> Write. UART2 (EXT) has also bit (bit 5) which indicates that CPU can
> load 4 bytes, but seems that this is not used by mvebu-uart.c driver.
> 
> Macro STAT_TX_RDY() is polled also in wait_for_xmitr() function.

Hi,
so care to send fixes for the two issues :)? The series is not meant to 
change behavior...

>> +}
>> +
>> +static void mvebu_uart_put_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char ch)
>> +{
>> +	writel(ch, port->membase + UART_TSH(port));
>> +}
>> +
>>   static unsigned int mvebu_uart_get_mctrl(struct uart_port *port)
>>   {
>>   	return TIOCM_CTS | TIOCM_DSR | TIOCM_CAR;
>> @@ -324,40 +334,7 @@ static void mvebu_uart_rx_chars(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int status)
>>   
>>   static void mvebu_uart_tx_chars(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int status)
>>   {
>> -	struct circ_buf *xmit = &port->state->xmit;
>> -	unsigned int count;
>> -	unsigned int st;
>> -
>> -	if (port->x_char) {
>> -		writel(port->x_char, port->membase + UART_TSH(port));
>> -		port->icount.tx++;
>> -		port->x_char = 0;
>> -		return;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (uart_circ_empty(xmit) || uart_tx_stopped(port)) {
>> -		mvebu_uart_stop_tx(port);
>> -		return;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	for (count = 0; count < port->fifosize; count++) {
>> -		writel(xmit->buf[xmit->tail], port->membase + UART_TSH(port));
>> -		xmit->tail = (xmit->tail + 1) & (UART_XMIT_SIZE - 1);
>> -		port->icount.tx++;
>> -
>> -		if (uart_circ_empty(xmit))
>> -			break;
>> -
>> -		st = readl(port->membase + UART_STAT);
>> -		if (st & STAT_TX_FIFO_FUL)
>> -			break;
> 
> I see that driver here currently use STAT_TX_FIFO_FUL for checking if it
> can do next iteration and write next character to UART_TSH.
> 
> Documentation about this bit says that ... the FIFO is full, which is
> indicated by TX_FIFO_FULL. TX_READY status is set as long as the FIFO is
> not full. The Tx ready status is cleared when in THR FIFO is full.
> 
> In case driver does not use 4 byte loads for UART2, TX_READY and
> !TX_FIFO_FULL are probably same...
> 
> Anyway, mvebu_uart_tx_chars() is called from the mvebu_uart_tx_isr()
> interrupt handler which is registered for CTRL_RX_RDY_INT interrupt
> which should signal when TX_READY is set.
> 
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (uart_circ_chars_pending(xmit) < WAKEUP_CHARS)
>> -		uart_write_wakeup(port);
>> -
>> -	if (uart_circ_empty(xmit))
>> -		mvebu_uart_stop_tx(port);
>> +	uart_port_tx_limit(port, port->fifosize);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static irqreturn_t mvebu_uart_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> @@ -654,6 +631,8 @@ static void mvebu_uart_put_poll_char(struct uart_port *port, unsigned char c)
>>   
>>   static const struct uart_ops mvebu_uart_ops = {
>>   	.tx_empty	= mvebu_uart_tx_empty,
>> +	.tx_ready	= mvebu_uart_tx_ready,
>> +	.put_char	= mvebu_uart_put_char,
>>   	.set_mctrl	= mvebu_uart_set_mctrl,
>>   	.get_mctrl	= mvebu_uart_get_mctrl,
>>   	.stop_tx	= mvebu_uart_stop_tx,

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-29  7:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-11 10:54 [PATCH 0/3] tty: TX helpers Jiri Slaby
2022-04-11 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] tty: serial: introduce uart_port_tx{,_limit}() helpers Jiri Slaby
2022-04-14 16:32   ` Greg KH
2022-04-15  7:47     ` Jiri Slaby
2022-04-15  8:42       ` Greg KH
2022-04-11 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: use uart_port_tx() helper Jiri Slaby
2022-04-11 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] tty: serial: use uart_port_tx_limit() helper Jiri Slaby
2022-04-11 11:51   ` Pali Rohár
2022-08-29  7:27     ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
2022-08-29  8:50       ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a1f4ce9-4158-b8ab-1837-68da06f20407@kernel.org \
    --to=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).