Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] i2c: core: add api to provide frequency mode strings

[Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>]

On 2021/4/7 3:54, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
>> index 10bd0b0..7268180 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
>> @@ -47,6 +47,26 @@ typedef int (*i2c_slave_cb_t)(struct i2c_client *client,
>>  #define I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ	3400000
>>  #define I2C_MAX_ULTRA_FAST_MODE_FREQ	5000000
>>  
>> +static inline const char *i2c_freq_mode_string(u32 bus_freq_hz)
>> +{
>> +	switch (bus_freq_hz) {
>> +	case I2C_MAX_STANDARD_MODE_FREQ:
>> +		return "Standard Mode (100 kHz)";
>> +	case I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ:
>> +		return "Fast Mode (400 kHz)";
>> +	case I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ:
>> +		return "Fast Mode Plus (1.0 MHz)";
>> +	case I2C_MAX_TURBO_MODE_FREQ:
>> +		return "Turbo Mode (1.4 MHz)";
>> +	case I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ:
>> +		return "High Speed Mode (3.4 MHz)";
>> +	case I2C_MAX_ULTRA_FAST_MODE_FREQ:
>> +		return "Ultra Fast Mode (5.0 MHz)";
>> +	default:
>> +		return "Unknown Mode";
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> Any reason ehy this is an inline function? My gut feeling says it would
> be better added to the core?
> 

it's not a complicated function so i didn't think it'll make much difference,
so i just put it in the header along with the coresponding macro definitions.
do you want me to move it to the core?

Thanks