From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
To: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hughd@google.com" <hughd@google.com>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>,
"apopple@nvidia.com" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"surenb@google.com" <surenb@google.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"rcampbell@nvidia.com" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem error at swapoff time
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 17:34:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f6dc98b-88f4-c0c9-eb7b-5356ad0e08b1@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220520063433.GA584983@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
On 2022/5/20 14:34, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:50:29PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> When swap in shmem error at swapoff time, there would be a infinite loop
>> in the while loop in shmem_unuse_inode(). It's because swapin error is
>> deliberately ignored now and thus info->swapped will never reach 0. So
>> we can't escape the loop in shmem_unuse().
>>
>> In order to fix the issue, swapin_error entry is stored in the mapping
>> when swapin error occurs. So the swapcache page can be freed and the
>> user won't end up with a permanently mounted swap because a sector is
>> bad. If the page is accessed later, the user process will be killed
>> so that corrupted data is never consumed. On the other hand, if the
>> page is never accessed, the user won't even notice it.
>>
>> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>
> Hi Miaohe,
>
> Thank you for the update. I might miss something, but I still see the same
> problem (I checked it on mm-everything-2022-05-19-00-03 + this patchset).
Hi Naoya,
I reproduce the issue in the linux-next-next-20220520 version. And I found even if
I *do not inject the swapin error*, the deadloop still occurs. After investigating the
code for a long while, I found the root cause:
diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
index d55dd972023a..6d23ed4d23cb 100644
--- a/mm/shmem.c
+++ b/mm/shmem.c
@@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static int shmem_find_swap_entries(struct address_space *mapping,
if (swp_type(entry) != type)
continue;
- indices[ret] = xas.xa_index;
+ indices[ret++] = xas.xa_index;
if (!folio_batch_add(fbatch, folio))
break;
The origin code does not increment the ret value when a folio is found. I will send a patch
to fix this next week. Thanks! :)
BTW: With the above change, deadloop doesn't occur when swapin error is injected. I will take
a more close look at next week.
Thanks!
>
> This patch has the effect to change the return value of shmem_swapin_folio(),
> -EIO (without this patch) to -EEXIST (with this patch).
> But shmem_unuse_swap_entries() checks neither, so no change from caller's view point.
> Maybe breaking in errors (rather than ENOMEM) in for loop in shmem_unuse_swap_entries()
> solves the issue? I briefly checked with the below change, then swapoff can return
> with failure.
>
> @@ -1222,7 +1222,7 @@ static int shmem_unuse_swap_entries(struct inode *inode,
> folio_put(folio);
> ret++;
> }
> - if (error == -ENOMEM)
> + if (error < 0)
> break;
> error = 0;
> }
>
>> ---
>> mm/shmem.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index d3c7970e0179..d55dd972023a 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -1175,6 +1175,10 @@ static int shmem_find_swap_entries(struct address_space *mapping,
>> continue;
>>
>> entry = radix_to_swp_entry(folio);
>> + /*
>> + * swapin error entries can be found in the mapping. But they're
>> + * deliberately ignored here as we've done everything we can do.
>> + */
>> if (swp_type(entry) != type)
>> continue;
>>
>> @@ -1672,6 +1676,36 @@ static int shmem_replace_page(struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp,
>> return error;
>> }
>>
>> +static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> + struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t swap)
>> +{
>> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
>> + struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
>> + swp_entry_t swapin_error;
>> + void *old;
>> +
>> + swapin_error = make_swapin_error_entry(&folio->page);
>> + old = xa_cmpxchg_irq(&mapping->i_pages, index,
>> + swp_to_radix_entry(swap),
>> + swp_to_radix_entry(swapin_error), 0);
>> + if (old != swp_to_radix_entry(swap))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + folio_wait_writeback(folio);
>> + delete_from_swap_cache(&folio->page);
>> + spin_lock_irq(&info->lock);
>> + /*
>> + * Don't treat swapin error folio as alloced. Otherwise inode->i_blocks won't
>> + * be 0 when inode is released and thus trigger WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks) in
>> + * shmem_evict_inode.
>> + */
>> + info->alloced--;
>> + info->swapped--;
>> + shmem_recalc_inode(inode);
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&info->lock);
>> + swap_free(swap);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Swap in the page pointed to by *pagep.
>> * Caller has to make sure that *pagep contains a valid swapped page.
>
> (off-topic a little) BTW, the comment on shmem_swapin_folio() still mentions
> *pagep, but maybe it can be updated to *foliop.
>
> Thanks,
> Naoya Horiguchi
>
>> @@ -1695,6 +1729,9 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> swap = radix_to_swp_entry(*foliop);
>> *foliop = NULL;
>>
>> + if (is_swapin_error_entry(swap))
>> + return -EIO;
>> +
>> /* Look it up and read it in.. */
>> page = lookup_swap_cache(swap, NULL, 0);
>> if (!page) {
>> @@ -1762,6 +1799,8 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
>> failed:
>> if (!shmem_confirm_swap(mapping, index, swap))
>> error = -EEXIST;
>> + if (error == -EIO)
>> + shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(inode, index, folio, swap);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-21 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 12:50 [PATCH v4 0/5] A few fixup patches for mm Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/swapfile: unuse_pte can map random data if swap read fails Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/swapfile: Fix lost swap bits in unuse_pte() Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/madvise: free hwpoison and swapin error entry in madvise_free_pte_range Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem error at swapoff time Miaohe Lin
2022-05-20 6:34 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-20 8:17 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-22 23:53 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-23 3:01 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-23 11:23 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-24 6:44 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-24 10:56 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-21 9:34 ` Miaohe Lin [this message]
2022-05-24 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-25 1:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25 4:32 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-25 6:40 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-26 6:08 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm: filter out swapin error entry in shmem mapping Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25 4:53 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f6dc98b-88f4-c0c9-eb7b-5356ad0e08b1@huawei.com \
--to=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).