From: "HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)" <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hughd@google.com" <hughd@google.com>,
"willy@infradead.org" <willy@infradead.org>,
"vbabka@suse.cz" <vbabka@suse.cz>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"neilb@suse.de" <neilb@suse.de>,
"apopple@nvidia.com" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"david@redhat.com" <david@redhat.com>,
"surenb@google.com" <surenb@google.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"rcampbell@nvidia.com" <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem error at swapoff time
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 06:08:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526060800.GA861236@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd9ac56b-c50a-6c6f-339b-50c347f601b4@huawei.com>
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:40:40PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> On 2022/5/25 12:32, HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) wrote:
> > On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 08:50:29PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> >> When swap in shmem error at swapoff time, there would be a infinite loop
> >> in the while loop in shmem_unuse_inode(). It's because swapin error is
> >> deliberately ignored now and thus info->swapped will never reach 0. So
> >> we can't escape the loop in shmem_unuse().
> >>
> >> In order to fix the issue, swapin_error entry is stored in the mapping
> >> when swapin error occurs. So the swapcache page can be freed and the
> >> user won't end up with a permanently mounted swap because a sector is
> >> bad. If the page is accessed later, the user process will be killed
> >> so that corrupted data is never consumed. On the other hand, if the
> >> page is never accessed, the user won't even notice it.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >
> > ...
> >> @@ -1672,6 +1676,36 @@ static int shmem_replace_page(struct page **pagep, gfp_t gfp,
> >> return error;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index,
> >> + struct folio *folio, swp_entry_t swap)
> >> +{
> >> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> >> + struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(inode);
> >> + swp_entry_t swapin_error;
> >> + void *old;
> >> +
> >> + swapin_error = make_swapin_error_entry(&folio->page);
> >> + old = xa_cmpxchg_irq(&mapping->i_pages, index,
> >> + swp_to_radix_entry(swap),
> >> + swp_to_radix_entry(swapin_error), 0);
> >> + if (old != swp_to_radix_entry(swap))
> >> + return;
> >> +
> >> + folio_wait_writeback(folio);
> >> + delete_from_swap_cache(&folio->page);
> >> + spin_lock_irq(&info->lock);
> >> + /*
> >> + * Don't treat swapin error folio as alloced. Otherwise inode->i_blocks won't
> >> + * be 0 when inode is released and thus trigger WARN_ON(inode->i_blocks) in
> >> + * shmem_evict_inode.
> >> + */
> >> + info->alloced--;
> >> + info->swapped--;
> >
> > I'm not familiar with folio yet and might miss some basic thing,
> > but is it OK to decrement by one instead of folio_nr_pages()?
>
> info->swapped is also decremented by one in shmem_swapin_folio(). In fact, no huge page
> swapin is supported yet (this is also true for non-shmem case). So I think info->swapped--
> should be OK. Or am I miss something?
OK, thanks for clarification.
Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-26 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 12:50 [PATCH v4 0/5] A few fixup patches for mm Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] mm/swapfile: unuse_pte can map random data if swap read fails Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] mm/swapfile: Fix lost swap bits in unuse_pte() Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] mm/madvise: free hwpoison and swapin error entry in madvise_free_pte_range Miaohe Lin
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] mm/shmem: fix infinite loop when swap in shmem error at swapoff time Miaohe Lin
2022-05-20 6:34 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-20 8:17 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-22 23:53 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-23 3:01 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-23 11:23 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-24 6:44 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-24 10:56 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-21 9:34 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-24 22:10 ` Andrew Morton
2022-05-25 1:42 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25 4:32 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2022-05-25 6:40 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-05-26 6:08 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) [this message]
2022-05-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] mm: filter out swapin error entry in shmem mapping Miaohe Lin
2022-05-25 4:53 ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220526060800.GA861236@hori.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp \
--to=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).