From: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
To: Herman Oosthuysen <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How did the Spelling Police miss this one?
Date: 23 Apr 2003 10:10:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1051114214.29426.31.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EA6B8FA.2020409@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 10:02, Herman Oosthuysen wrote:
> Uhh, should that not be "canonize"?
> (To conform to the canon)
> You can save four more characters I would think... ;-)
>
> Steven Cole wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 07:33, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> >
> >>[me@qq linux-2.5.68-ref]$ grep -R cannonicalize * | wc -l
> >> 65
> >>
> >> Avast there ye swabs, prepare to fire a broadside!
> >
> >
> > Almost all of the spelling fixes from the Spelling Police were in
> > comments, not code. This mistaken spelling of canonicalize is mostly in
> > various parts of the non-comment code.
Yeah, I thought about canonize vs canonicalize, but canonize has a long
religious history. Canonicalize has been coined rightly or wrongly by
computer folk. See this:
http://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/0,,sid9_gci841392,00.html
Steven "loose cannon among the Spelling Police" Cole
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-23 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-23 13:33 How did the Spelling Police miss this one? Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-23 14:53 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-23 16:02 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-23 16:10 ` Steven Cole [this message]
2003-04-24 3:39 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-04-24 3:53 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-24 4:16 ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-04-24 4:34 ` Miles Bader
2003-04-24 19:08 ` Alan Cox
2003-04-24 23:06 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-27 11:14 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-04-24 4:26 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-24 14:46 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:09 ` viro
2003-04-24 15:44 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-24 16:06 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:47 ` Steven Cole
2003-04-27 11:09 ` Kai Henningsen
2003-04-24 15:55 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 15:33 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2003-04-24 15:57 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-24 23:25 Chuck Ebbert
2003-04-25 1:39 ` Steven Cole
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1051114214.29426.31.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov \
--to=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).