* Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3 [not found] ` <fa.hh6ttrp.1d52bhj@ifi.uio.no> @ 2003-06-25 20:54 ` Jonathan Hudson [not found] ` <fa.h3c32fv.r5m12l@ifi.uio.no> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Hudson @ 2003-06-25 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel In article <fa.hh6ttrp.1d52bhj@ifi.uio.no>, Thijs <thijs@balpol.tudelft.nl> writes: T> Hi, T> T> Since 2.4.21-ac2 i'm experiencing problems with Postfix on Debian T> Stable. Messages get corrupted while being handled by Postfix. T> T> Vanilla 2.4.21 and 2.4.21-ac1 are fine, but 2.4.21-ac2/3 causes T> problems. Going back to ac1 resolves the issue. I tried kernels on T> several Debian servers, but all have the same problem. Could be it's T> something in postfix that emerges with this specific patch, but it's at T> least curious. I'm not too familiar with this matter unfortunately. Same problem here observed with -ac3 (reiserfs). Thanks for the warning. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <fa.h3c32fv.r5m12l@ifi.uio.no>]
* Re: weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) [not found] ` <fa.h3c32fv.r5m12l@ifi.uio.no> @ 2003-06-25 22:34 ` Jonathan Hudson 2003-06-25 23:19 ` Scott McDermott 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Hudson @ 2003-06-25 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel In article <fa.h3c32fv.r5m12l@ifi.uio.no>, Scott McDermott <vaxerdec@frontiernet.net> writes: SM> Thijs on Wed 25/06 22:29 +0200: >> Since 2.4.21-ac2 i'm experiencing problems with Postfix on >> Debian Stable. Messages get corrupted while being handled >> by Postfix. SM> SM> I thought I was crazy, I'm seeing this also. I had to SM> switch my kernel back on our mail hub because postfix kept SM> doing this every time I boot the new kernel. I tried to SM> figure out why but could not; the system *appears* to run SM> normally otherwise. I was moving from 2.4.21-pre4-ac1 SM> +gibbs-aic7xxx patches from that time, to 2.4.21-ac2 SM> +gibbs-aic7xxx from 20030603, and I thought that might be it SM> (the AIC patches); are you running AIC adapters on your SM> system with the gibbs patches by any chance? SM> No AIC or any kind here. Bring on the next suspect. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) 2003-06-25 22:34 ` weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) Jonathan Hudson @ 2003-06-25 23:19 ` Scott McDermott 2003-06-26 17:24 ` Jonathan Hudson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Scott McDermott @ 2003-06-25 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Hudson; +Cc: linux-kernel Jonathan Hudson on Wed 25/06 23:34 +0100: > No AIC or any kind here. Bring on the next suspect. does changing the unix_dgram_ops `poll' op from `dgram_poll' to `datagram_poll' in net/unix/af_unix.c change anything for you? I can't test this myself until later this week. Also I don't know what other bug the unix_peer_get() addition is supposed to fix, so... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) 2003-06-25 23:19 ` Scott McDermott @ 2003-06-26 17:24 ` Jonathan Hudson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Hudson @ 2003-06-26 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Scott McDermott; +Cc: linux-kernel On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 00:19, Scott McDermott wrote: > Jonathan Hudson on Wed 25/06 23:34 +0100: > > No AIC or any kind here. Bring on the next suspect. > > does changing the unix_dgram_ops `poll' op from `dgram_poll' > to `datagram_poll' in net/unix/af_unix.c change anything for > you? I can't test this myself until later this week. Also I > don't know what other bug the unix_peer_get() addition is > supposed to fix, so... I'll see if I can test this out, once I've build -ac3 on a box where I don't drop real messages. -jonathan ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2ltx.Us.17@gated-at.bofh.it>]
* Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3 [not found] <2ltx.Us.17@gated-at.bofh.it> @ 2003-06-25 20:29 ` Thijs 2003-06-25 22:15 ` weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) Scott McDermott 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thijs @ 2003-06-25 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hi, Since 2.4.21-ac2 i'm experiencing problems with Postfix on Debian Stable. Messages get corrupted while being handled by Postfix. Vanilla 2.4.21 and 2.4.21-ac1 are fine, but 2.4.21-ac2/3 causes problems. Going back to ac1 resolves the issue. I tried kernels on several Debian servers, but all have the same problem. Could be it's something in postfix that emerges with this specific patch, but it's at least curious. I'm not too familiar with this matter unfortunately. The only logentries i see are: postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: active/0/4/04E5B17E3F: too many length bits, record type 255 postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: 04E5B17E3F: envelope records out of order postfix/qmgr[399]: warning: saving corrupt file "04E5B17E3F" from queue "active" to queue "corrupt" ...or just... postfix/smtp[536]: warning: corrupted queue file: active/C/7/C7AC317E3F Tested on: Intel PPro, Intel Celeron, AMD Duron Tested on: ext2 and ext3 All other programms seem to work fine, no other strange messages whatsoever... Regards, --Thijs Welman Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) 2003-06-25 20:29 ` Linux 2.4.21-ac3 Thijs @ 2003-06-25 22:15 ` Scott McDermott 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Scott McDermott @ 2003-06-25 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Thijs, alan Thijs on Wed 25/06 22:29 +0200: > Since 2.4.21-ac2 i'm experiencing problems with Postfix on > Debian Stable. Messages get corrupted while being handled > by Postfix. I thought I was crazy, I'm seeing this also. I had to switch my kernel back on our mail hub because postfix kept doing this every time I boot the new kernel. I tried to figure out why but could not; the system *appears* to run normally otherwise. I was moving from 2.4.21-pre4-ac1 +gibbs-aic7xxx patches from that time, to 2.4.21-ac2 +gibbs-aic7xxx from 20030603, and I thought that might be it (the AIC patches); are you running AIC adapters on your system with the gibbs patches by any chance? here's what I'm seeing on my mail hub getting a test message from one of the exchangers: Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/smtpd[997]: connect from mx1.mydomain.tld[1.2.3.4] Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/nqmgr[983]: 7017833812: from=<someone@someother.tld>, size=347, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/nqmgr[983]: warning: active/7/0/7017833812: too many length bits, record type 255 Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/nqmgr[983]: warning: 7017833812: envelope records out of order Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/nqmgr[983]: warning: saving corrupt file "7017833812" from queue "active" to queue "corrupt" Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/smtpd[997]: A6CF3339AA: client=mx1.mydomain.tld[1.2.3.4] Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/cleanup[991]: A6CF3339AA: message-id=<q$28m4t24a-frqgm---0t-84$dx$z@gq1.5axh> Jun 24 05:07:54 lujuria postfix/smtpd[997]: disconnect from mx1.mydomain.tld[1.2.3.4] this is system is RH8+updates with the mentioned kernels. Very bizarre. > All other programms seem to work fine, no other strange > messages whatsoever... yeah that's the weird part that had me scratching my head as well. The other poster said it happens for him on reiserfs, and I'm on ext3, so that would seem to rule out filesystems... hmm looking at -ac2 log, looks like the following might be possible: - Fix AF_UNIX dgram select problem + postfix uses lots of these, this sounds like the most likely candidate for sure - Revert problematic scsi change (fixes ppa/imm) + does it touch generic code? - Fix data direction for start stop scsi command + have no idea what this is - Add more unexpected apic filtering + I'm on SMP...don't know if this is related?? I don't see how it could be any of the other changes. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2pxg.4uT.27@gated-at.bofh.it>]
[parent not found: <2r5T.6gb.13@gated-at.bofh.it>]
[parent not found: <2r5T.6gb.11@gated-at.bofh.it>]
[parent not found: <2rSk.72B.7@gated-at.bofh.it>]
* Re: weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) [not found] ` <2rSk.72B.7@gated-at.bofh.it> @ 2003-06-26 19:08 ` Thijs 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Thijs @ 2003-06-26 19:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Scott McDermott wrote: > > does changing the unix_dgram_ops `poll' op from `dgram_poll' > to `datagram_poll' in net/unix/af_unix.c change anything for > you? I can't test this myself until later this week. Also I > don't know what other bug the unix_peer_get() addition is > supposed to fix, so... Tried it, but doesn't fix it, unfortunately... guess it's time for the next suspect ;) regards, --Thijs Welman ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-26 18:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <fa.cf4gkbu.1h1o5ik@ifi.uio.no> [not found] ` <fa.hh6ttrp.1d52bhj@ifi.uio.no> 2003-06-25 20:54 ` Linux 2.4.21-ac3 Jonathan Hudson [not found] ` <fa.h3c32fv.r5m12l@ifi.uio.no> 2003-06-25 22:34 ` weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) Jonathan Hudson 2003-06-25 23:19 ` Scott McDermott 2003-06-26 17:24 ` Jonathan Hudson [not found] <2ltx.Us.17@gated-at.bofh.it> 2003-06-25 20:29 ` Linux 2.4.21-ac3 Thijs 2003-06-25 22:15 ` weird postfix mailspool corruption with 2.4.21-ac2+ (was Re: Linux 2.4.21-ac3) Scott McDermott [not found] <2pxg.4uT.27@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <2r5T.6gb.13@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <2r5T.6gb.11@gated-at.bofh.it> [not found] ` <2rSk.72B.7@gated-at.bofh.it> 2003-06-26 19:08 ` Thijs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).