linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SHED] Questions.
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 01:55:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1062395745.1313.42.camel@boobies.awol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309011507.45314.kernel@kolivas.org>

On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 01:07, Con Kolivas wrote:

> I hate to keep butting in and saying this but this is not quite what happens. 
> If a task is considered interactive (a priority boost of 2 or more) and it 
> uses up a full timeslice then it is checked to see if a starvation limit has 
> been exceeded by the tasks on the expired array. If it hasn't exceeded the 
> limit, the interactive task will be rescheduled again ahead of everything 
> else. ie if A is the only task still considered interactive after using up 
> it's timeslice the first time it will go

I know this.  I mentioned earlier what I was saying was ignoring the
interactive task reinsertion optimization.

I am trying to explain things in general.

	Robert Love



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-01  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-31 10:07 [SHED] Questions Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 10:17 ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-31 10:24   ` Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 10:41     ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-31 10:46       ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]       ` <1062326980.9959.65.camel@big.pomac.com>
     [not found]         ` <3F51D4A4.4090501@cyberone.com.au>
2003-08-31 11:08           ` Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 11:31             ` Nick Piggin
2003-08-31 11:43               ` Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 18:53 ` Robert Love
2003-08-31 19:31   ` Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 19:51     ` Robert Love
2003-08-31 22:41       ` Ian Kumlien
2003-08-31 23:41         ` Robert Love
2003-09-01  0:00           ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-01  2:50             ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-01 15:58               ` Antonio Vargas
2003-09-01 22:19               ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-01  4:03             ` Robert Love
2003-09-01  5:07               ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-01  5:55                 ` Robert Love [this message]
2003-09-01 22:24               ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-01 14:21             ` Antonio Vargas
2003-09-01 19:36               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-09-01 22:49               ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-01 15:07           ` Daniel Phillips
2003-09-01 14:16             ` Antonio Vargas
2003-09-01 23:03             ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-02  0:04               ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-02  0:23               ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-02 10:25                 ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-02 11:08                   ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-02 17:22                     ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-02 23:49                       ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-03 23:02                         ` Ian Kumlien
2003-09-04  1:39                           ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-02 10:44                 ` Wes Janzen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1062395745.1313.42.camel@boobies.awol.org \
    --to=rml@tech9.net \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pomac@vapor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).