* [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs
@ 2004-01-13 16:57 Samium Gromoff
2004-01-13 17:19 ` Trond Myklebust
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2004-01-13 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Participants:
- a 2.4.18 server exporting with a `nohide' option a reiserfs filesystem A
with a reiserfs filesystem B mounted in it.
- a 2.6.0 client.
Problem:
Upon mounting A the 2.6.0 client doesn`t see the filesystem B inside.
regards, Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs
2004-01-13 16:57 [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs Samium Gromoff
@ 2004-01-13 17:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-14 12:27 ` Greg Banks
2004-01-14 12:28 ` Samium Gromoff
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Trond Myklebust @ 2004-01-13 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samium Gromoff; +Cc: linux-kernel
På ty , 13/01/2004 klokka 11:57, skreiv Samium Gromoff:
> Participants:
>
> - a 2.4.18 server exporting with a `nohide' option a reiserfs filesystem A
> with a reiserfs filesystem B mounted in it.
>
Mind showing us your /etc/exports? I'll bet you have the "nohide" option
set on the wrong entry.
"nohide" should set be on the /etc/exports entry for "B" if the latter
is mounted inside "A". It does not have to be set on the entry for "A".
Cheers,
Trond
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs
2004-01-13 17:19 ` Trond Myklebust
@ 2004-01-14 12:27 ` Greg Banks
2004-01-14 12:28 ` Samium Gromoff
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Banks @ 2004-01-14 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 12:19:38PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> På ty , 13/01/2004 klokka 11:57, skreiv Samium Gromoff:
> > Participants:
> >
> > - a 2.4.18 server exporting with a `nohide' option a reiserfs filesystem A
> > with a reiserfs filesystem B mounted in it.
> >
>
> Mind showing us your /etc/exports? I'll bet you have the "nohide" option
> set on the wrong entry.
>
> "nohide" should set be on the /etc/exports entry for "B" if the latter
> is mounted inside "A". It does not have to be set on the entry for "A".
The other gotcha is that the export entry must specify the client
hostname explicitly, not with a * wildcard.
BTW I have a patch to fix this which I haven't submitted to Neil yet.
Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs
2004-01-13 17:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-14 12:27 ` Greg Banks
@ 2004-01-14 12:28 ` Samium Gromoff
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Samium Gromoff @ 2004-01-14 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust; +Cc: Samium Gromoff, linux-kernel
At Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:19:38 -0500,
Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> På ty , 13/01/2004 klokka 11:57, skreiv Samium Gromoff:
> > Participants:
> >
> > - a 2.4.18 server exporting with a `nohide' option a reiserfs filesystem A
> > with a reiserfs filesystem B mounted in it.
> >
>
> Mind showing us your /etc/exports? I'll bet you have the "nohide" option
> set on the wrong entry.
>
> "nohide" should set be on the /etc/exports entry for "B" if the latter
> is mounted inside "A". It does not have to be set on the entry for "A".
Exactly my mistake... thanks!
> Cheers,
> Trond
regards, Samium Gromoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-14 12:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-13 16:57 [NFS][2.4][ReiserFS] NFS and `nohide' vs. reiserfs Samium Gromoff
2004-01-13 17:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-01-14 12:27 ` Greg Banks
2004-01-14 12:28 ` Samium Gromoff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).