linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Praedor Atrebates <praedor@yahoo.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: System clock speed too high - 2.6.3 kernel
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:25:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1080660339.5408.356.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200403261800.32717.praedor@yahoo.com>

On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 15:00, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> On Friday 26 March 2004 04:22 pm, john stultz held forth thus:
> > On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:30, Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> > > In doing a web search on system clock speeds being too high, I found
> > > entries describing exactly what I am experiencing in the linux-kernel
> > > list archives, but have not yet found a resolution.
> > >
> > > I have Mandrake 10.0, kernel-2.6.3-7mdk installed, on an IBM Thinkpad
> > > 1412 laptop, celeron 366, 512MB RAM.  I am finding that my system clock
> > > is ticking away at a rate of about 3:1 vs reality, ie, I count ~3 seconds
> [...]
> > Could you please send me dmesg output for this system?
> >
> Attached is the output of dmesg.  

You mentioned that your system is an older laptop, and you're setting
"acpi=on" in your boot arguments. What happens when you omit "acpi=on"?
Do you get a message saying something to the effect of your system being
too old for ACPI? Does everything still work as it ought?

I'm still working on this one. 
See http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2375 for more details.

thanks
-john


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-03-30 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-26 19:30 System clock speed too high - 2.6.3 kernel Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 21:22 ` john stultz
2004-03-26 21:54   ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 23:09     ` john stultz
     [not found]   ` <200403261800.32717.praedor@yahoo.com>
2004-03-26 21:57     ` john stultz
2004-03-26 22:05       ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 22:18       ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-30 15:25     ` john stultz [this message]
2004-04-06 21:46       ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-03-26 21:46 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-26 21:57   ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-27 16:09     ` George Anzinger
     [not found] <1E4zj-77w-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-25  9:22 ` Joris van Rantwijk
2004-05-25 20:53   ` john stultz
2004-05-25 20:58   ` john stultz
2004-05-26 22:43     ` Joris van Rantwijk
2004-05-26 23:08       ` john stultz
2004-05-27 13:32       ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1080660339.5408.356.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=praedor@yahoo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).