From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Joris van Rantwijk <joris@eljakim.nl>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: System clock speed too high - 2.6.3 kernel
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:58:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1085518688.8653.19.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405251112040.30050@eljakim.netsystem.nl>
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 02:22, Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
> Perhaps this should be documented in the kernel config info.
> If there are many systems with this problem, then calibrating the PM timer
> against the PIT timer at boot time (possibly rejecting invalid rates)
> might be an option.
Also your point above is a good one. We probably should do a sanity
check to make sure we're getting a reasonable frequency (however then
we'll probably start having troubles w/ systems that have broken PITs ;)
I'll put it on my todo list, but if you'd like to take a swing at ti and
beat me to the implementation, I wouldn't complain.
thanks
-john
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-25 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1E4zj-77w-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-25 9:22 ` System clock speed too high - 2.6.3 kernel Joris van Rantwijk
2004-05-25 20:53 ` john stultz
2004-05-25 20:58 ` john stultz [this message]
2004-05-26 22:43 ` Joris van Rantwijk
2004-05-26 23:08 ` john stultz
2004-05-27 21:35 ` [PATCH] 2.6.6 Validate PM-Timer rate at boot time Joris van Rantwijk
2004-05-27 13:32 ` System clock speed too high - 2.6.3 kernel Bill Davidsen
2004-03-26 19:30 Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 21:22 ` john stultz
2004-03-26 21:54 ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 23:09 ` john stultz
[not found] ` <200403261800.32717.praedor@yahoo.com>
2004-03-26 21:57 ` john stultz
2004-03-26 22:05 ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-26 22:18 ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-30 15:25 ` john stultz
2004-04-06 21:46 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-03-26 21:46 ` George Anzinger
2004-03-26 21:57 ` Praedor Atrebates
2004-03-27 16:09 ` George Anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1085518688.8653.19.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=joris@eljakim.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).