From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
peterx@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 5/5] vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:18:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <109b40c3-61d4-42f2-5914-ab8433a70ef1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190308145800.GA3661@redhat.com>
On 2019/3/8 下午10:58, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 04:50:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2019/3/8 上午3:16, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 12:56:45PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 10:47:22AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 02:18:12AM -0500, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>>> +static const struct mmu_notifier_ops vhost_mmu_notifier_ops = {
>>>>>> + .invalidate_range = vhost_invalidate_range,
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> void vhost_dev_init(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>>>>>> struct vhost_virtqueue **vqs, int nvqs, int iov_limit)
>>>>>> {
>>>>> I also wonder here: when page is write protected then
>>>>> it does not look like .invalidate_range is invoked.
>>>>>
>>>>> E.g. mm/ksm.c calls
>>>>>
>>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start and
>>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end but not mmu_notifier_invalidate_range.
>>>>>
>>>>> Similarly, rmap in page_mkclean_one will not call
>>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I'm right vhost won't get notified when page is write-protected since you
>>>>> didn't install start/end notifiers. Note that end notifier can be called
>>>>> with page locked, so it's not as straight-forward as just adding a call.
>>>>> Writing into a write-protected page isn't a good idea.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that documentation says:
>>>>> it is fine to delay the mmu_notifier_invalidate_range
>>>>> call to mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end() outside the page table lock.
>>>>> implying it's called just later.
>>>> OK I missed the fact that _end actually calls
>>>> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range internally. So that part is fine but the
>>>> fact that you are trying to take page lock under VQ mutex and take same
>>>> mutex within notifier probably means it's broken for ksm and rmap at
>>>> least since these call invalidate with lock taken.
>>> Yes this lock inversion needs more thoughts.
>>>
>>>> And generally, Andrea told me offline one can not take mutex under
>>>> the notifier callback. I CC'd Andrea for why.
>>> Yes, the problem then is the ->invalidate_page is called then under PT
>>> lock so it cannot take mutex, you also cannot take the page_lock, it
>>> can at most take a spinlock or trylock_page.
>>>
>>> So it must switch back to the _start/_end methods unless you rewrite
>>> the locking.
>>>
>>> The difference with _start/_end, is that ->invalidate_range avoids the
>>> _start callback basically, but to avoid the _start callback safely, it
>>> has to be called in between the ptep_clear_flush and the set_pte_at
>>> whenever the pfn changes like during a COW. So it cannot be coalesced
>>> in a single TLB flush that invalidates all sptes in a range like we
>>> prefer for performance reasons for example in KVM. It also cannot
>>> sleep.
>>>
>>> In short ->invalidate_range must be really fast (it shouldn't require
>>> to send IPI to all other CPUs like KVM may require during an
>>> invalidate_range_start) and it must not sleep, in order to prefer it
>>> to _start/_end.
>>>
>>> I.e. the invalidate of the secondary MMU that walks the linux
>>> pagetables in hardware (in vhost case with GUP in software) has to
>>> happen while the linux pagetable is zero, otherwise a concurrent
>>> hardware pagetable lookup could re-instantiate a mapping to the old
>>> page in between the set_pte_at and the invalidate_range_end (which
>>> internally calls ->invalidate_range). Jerome documented it nicely in
>>> Documentation/vm/mmu_notifier.rst .
>>
>> Right, I've actually gone through this several times but some details were
>> missed by me obviously.
>>
>>
>>> Now you don't really walk the pagetable in hardware in vhost, but if
>>> you use gup_fast after usemm() it's similar.
>>>
>>> For vhost the invalidate would be really fast, there are no IPI to
>>> deliver at all, the problem is just the mutex.
>>
>> Yes. A possible solution is to introduce a valid flag for VA. Vhost may only
>> try to access kernel VA when it was valid. Invalidate_range_start() will
>> clear this under the protection of the vq mutex when it can block. Then
>> invalidate_range_end() then can clear this flag. An issue is blockable is
>> always false for range_end().
>>
> Note that there can be multiple asynchronous concurrent invalidate_range
> callbacks. So a flag does not work but a counter of number of active
> invalidation would. See how KSM is doing it for instance in kvm_main.c
>
> The pattern for this kind of thing is:
> my_invalidate_range_start(start,end) {
> ...
> if (mystruct_overlap(mystruct, start, end)) {
> mystruct_lock();
> mystruct->invalidate_count++;
> ...
> mystruct_unlock();
> }
> }
>
> my_invalidate_range_end(start,end) {
> ...
> if (mystruct_overlap(mystruct, start, end)) {
> mystruct_lock();
> mystruct->invalidate_count--;
> ...
> mystruct_unlock();
> }
> }
>
> my_access_va(mystruct) {
> again:
> wait_on(!mystruct->invalidate_count)
> mystruct_lock();
> if (mystruct->invalidate_count) {
> mystruct_unlock();
> goto again;
> }
> GUP();
> ...
> mystruct_unlock();
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Jérôme
Yes, this should work.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-06 7:18 [RFC PATCH V2 0/5] vhost: accelerate metadata access through vmap() Jason Wang
2019-03-06 7:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 1/5] vhost: generalize adding used elem Jason Wang
2019-03-06 7:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 2/5] vhost: fine grain userspace memory accessors Jason Wang
2019-03-06 10:45 ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-03-07 2:38 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-06 7:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 3/5] vhost: rename vq_iotlb_prefetch() to vq_meta_prefetch() Jason Wang
2019-03-06 7:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 4/5] vhost: introduce helpers to get the size of metadata area Jason Wang
2019-03-06 10:56 ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-03-07 2:40 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-06 18:43 ` Souptick Joarder
2019-03-07 2:42 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-06 7:18 ` [RFC PATCH V2 5/5] vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address Jason Wang
2019-03-06 16:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-07 2:45 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-07 15:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-07 19:09 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-07 19:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-07 20:17 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-07 21:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-08 9:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-08 19:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-11 7:21 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-11 14:45 ` Jan Kara
2019-03-08 8:31 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-07 15:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-07 17:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-07 19:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-08 8:50 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-08 14:58 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-11 7:18 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2019-03-08 19:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-08 20:06 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-11 7:40 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-11 12:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-11 13:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-12 2:56 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 3:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-12 2:52 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 3:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-12 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-07 19:17 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-08 2:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-08 2:55 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-08 3:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-08 3:40 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-08 3:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-08 3:45 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-08 9:15 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-08 8:58 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-08 12:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-08 15:02 ` Jerome Glisse
2019-03-08 19:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-08 14:12 ` [RFC PATCH V2 0/5] vhost: accelerate metadata access through vmap() Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-11 7:13 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-11 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-11 18:14 ` David Miller
2019-03-12 2:59 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 3:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-12 7:17 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 11:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-12 15:46 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-12 20:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-12 20:53 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-12 21:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-12 21:19 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-12 21:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-12 22:02 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-12 22:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-12 22:57 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-13 16:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-03-13 16:37 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-14 10:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2019-03-14 13:49 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-14 19:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-03-15 4:39 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 5:14 ` James Bottomley
2019-03-12 7:51 ` Jason Wang
2019-03-12 7:53 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=109b40c3-61d4-42f2-5914-ab8433a70ef1@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).