linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:21:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10f740e80911271321t305e6439kc49707ac47d41a63@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0FB6CA.1030509@snapgear.com>

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:23, Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com> wrote:
> On 11/27/2009 06:43 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:43, Greg Ungerer<gerg@snapgear.com>  wrote:
>>> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:58, Stephen Rothwell<sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
>>>>> arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h between commit
>>>>> 63c361b65f6540043c4baabf1a044a45c7465858 ("m68k: use generic code for
>>>>> ptrace requests") from the m68k tree and commit
>>>>> 03a03164e8084b810e9f92906a51232d63bac72c ("m68knommu: define
>>>>> arch_has_single_step() and friends") from the m68knommu tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> These mostly add the same stuff but not quite :-(
>>>>
>>>> Ah sorry, my bad. I'm not yet used to the uClinux guys touching "my"
>>>> includes ;-)
>>>> So we need better coordination between us.
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, Greg's changes were inspired by Andreas' patch.
>>>
>>> Yes, largely they are.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> I have done a fixup (see below) and can carry it as necessary.  Please
>>>>> check the result.
>>>>
>>>> At first sight, it looks OK. Thanks for fixing it up!
>>>
>>> Yep, looks ok from what I can see.
>>>
>>> Geert, how do you want to handle for the real linus merge?
>>> Do you want me to drop the changes to ptrace.h from that patch?
>>
>> I can apply your patch (modified to apply on top of Andreas') to the
>> m68k for-linus branch.
>> Does that sound OK for you?
>
> Yep, thats fine by me.

Done.

I also added the #ifdef CONFIG_MMU to Andreas' commit, so it will stay
bisectable on m68knommu.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-27 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-26  0:58 linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26 21:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27  4:43   ` Greg Ungerer
2009-11-27  8:43     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27 11:23       ` Greg Ungerer
2009-11-27 21:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2010-09-14  0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14  1:21 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-09-14  8:47   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-22  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-22  6:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-22  8:29   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-23  6:12     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-09  0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-09  7:08 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  7:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-11-09  7:37     ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09  8:19       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-11-14  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14  0:29 ` Greg Ungerer
2019-07-01 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-09-09 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13  7:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-09 23:44 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-10  3:37 ` Michael Schmitz
2022-05-10  4:15   ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10f740e80911271321t305e6439kc49707ac47d41a63@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).