From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:08:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EBA26D9.3050108@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111109111519.7d8969103ab32e7e8193c018@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
On 11/09/2011 10:15 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
> arch/m68k/Kconfig between commit d890d7399525 ("m68k/irq: Remove obsolete
> m68k irq framework") from the m68k tree and commit 4e8a9e70dfe8 ("m68k:
> selection of GENERIC_ATOMIC64 is not MMU specific") from the m68knommu
> tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
Thanks. Both this and the previous m68k merge conflict patch look good.
Geert: would you prefer I hold off on these 2 patches until after
you merge your IRQ changes?
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-09 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-09 0:15 linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-09 7:08 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2011-11-09 7:13 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-11-09 7:37 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09 8:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-09 23:44 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-10 3:37 ` Michael Schmitz
2022-05-10 4:15 ` Greg Ungerer
2020-09-09 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-13 7:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09 0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14 0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-14 0:29 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-11-09 0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-22 1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-06-22 6:34 ` Greg Ungerer
2011-06-22 8:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-06-23 6:12 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-09-14 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2010-09-14 1:21 ` Greg Ungerer
2010-09-14 8:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-26 0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-26 21:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27 4:43 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-11-27 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-11-27 11:23 ` Greg Ungerer
2009-11-27 21:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EBA26D9.3050108@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).