linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
To: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: first bisection results in -mm3 [was: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: reiser3 oops on suspend and more (bonus oops shot!)]
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:48:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1138146498.15682.99.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060124230453.GA6174@inferi.kami.home>

On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 00:04 +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 02:27:14PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > difficult spot is that if the cpufreq notification driver is a module,
> > then there will always be a window between the point at which we start
> > using the TSC to the point where we find out that the TSC is changing
> > frequency. Not sure what to do here just yet.
> 
> I was wondering if you could force an do_gettimeofday call quite early
> in order to lower tsc priority as soon as possible, but maybe I'm not
> entirely into that code :)

Well, it isn't do_gettimeofday that needs to be called, but we need a
way to decide if we should call tsc_mark_unstable(). Currently we do
that when we get a cpufreq transition notification if the cpu's TSC is
not constant.  The problem being: on your system, that notification
isn't called until after the cpufreq driver module loads. This is of
course, after we've started to use the TSC.

If the cpufreq driver loaded earlier, or we had some other way of
checking if the TSC was not constant, we could call tsc_mark_unstable()
then.

We'll probably have to do a manual check like what the cpufreq driver
does early on so we can have this info before we install the TSC
clocksource. I'll let you know when I have a patch to try.


> > Although I'm curious: Did the recent changes in 2.6.16-rc1-mm2 had any
> > effect on this issue?
> 
> no, I'm currently running it and the same behaviour still applies.

Drat. Well, thanks for testing.

-john


  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-24 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-10 23:55 2.6.15-mm2: reiser3 oops on suspend and more (bonus oops shot!) Mattia Dongili
2006-01-11  1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-11 10:00   ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-11 11:24     ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-11 18:40     ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-12 22:08       ` first bisection results in -mm3 [was: Re: 2.6.15-mm2: reiser3 oops on suspend and more (bonus oops shot!)] Mattia Dongili
2006-01-12 23:26         ` john stultz
2006-01-14 12:08           ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-16 20:16             ` john stultz
2006-01-16 20:40               ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-16 21:42                 ` john stultz
2006-01-16 22:19                   ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-16 22:41                     ` john stultz
2006-01-17 16:43                   ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-17 16:45                   ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-17  0:49                 ` john stultz
2006-01-17 17:49                   ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-17 19:11                     ` john stultz
2006-01-17 22:49                       ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-18 10:47                         ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-24 22:27                           ` john stultz
2006-01-24 23:04                             ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-24 23:48                               ` john stultz [this message]
2006-01-25  0:12                                 ` john stultz
2006-01-25 18:12                                   ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-11 10:02   ` 2.6.15-mm2: reiser3 oops on suspend and more (bonus oops shot!) Pavel Machek
2006-01-11 14:27   ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-15 22:14   ` 2.6.15-mm3 bisection: git-xfs.patch makes reiserfs oops Mattia Dongili
2006-01-15 22:48     ` Nathan Scott
2006-01-15 23:22       ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-16  9:29       ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-16 11:48         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-01-16 15:50           ` Mattia Dongili
2006-01-17  3:27           ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-16 11:51         ` Mattia Dongili

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1138146498.15682.99.camel@cog.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malattia@linux.it \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).