linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
@ 2006-02-03 22:26 Max Asbock
  2006-02-04  6:02 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Max Asbock @ 2006-02-03 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

ibmasm driver:
Fix the command_put() function which uses a pointer for a spinlock that
can be freed before dereferencing it.

Signed-off-by: Max Asbock masbock@us.ibm.com

---

diff -burpN linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h
--- linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-01 11:50:01.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-03 13:57:42.000000000 -0800
@@ -101,10 +101,11 @@ struct command {
 static inline void command_put(struct command *cmd)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	spinlock_t *lock = cmd->lock;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(cmd->lock, flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
         kobject_put(&cmd->kobj);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cmd->lock, flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
 }
 
 static inline void command_get(struct command *cmd)



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
  2006-02-03 22:26 [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer Max Asbock
@ 2006-02-04  6:02 ` Greg KH
  2006-02-07 17:29   ` Max Asbock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2006-02-04  6:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Asbock; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:26:38PM -0800, Max Asbock wrote:
> ibmasm driver:
> Fix the command_put() function which uses a pointer for a spinlock that
> can be freed before dereferencing it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Max Asbock masbock@us.ibm.com
> 
> ---
> 
> diff -burpN linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h
> --- linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-01 11:50:01.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-03 13:57:42.000000000 -0800
> @@ -101,10 +101,11 @@ struct command {
>  static inline void command_put(struct command *cmd)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	spinlock_t *lock = cmd->lock;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(cmd->lock, flags);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
>          kobject_put(&cmd->kobj);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cmd->lock, flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
>  }

If this patch is true, doesn't the spinlock the pointer is pointing out
still get deleted?

Yes you save a pointer off, but it looks like the problem is still
present.

Or am I missing something?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
  2006-02-04  6:02 ` Greg KH
@ 2006-02-07 17:29   ` Max Asbock
  2006-02-07 17:44     ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Max Asbock @ 2006-02-07 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 22:02, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:26:38PM -0800, Max Asbock wrote:
> > ibmasm driver:
> > Fix the command_put() function which uses a pointer for a spinlock that
> > can be freed before dereferencing it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Max Asbock masbock@us.ibm.com
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > diff -burpN linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h
> > --- linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-01 11:50:01.000000000 -0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-03 13:57:42.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -101,10 +101,11 @@ struct command {
> >  static inline void command_put(struct command *cmd)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> > +	spinlock_t *lock = cmd->lock;
> >  
> > -	spin_lock_irqsave(cmd->lock, flags);
> > +	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> >          kobject_put(&cmd->kobj);
> > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cmd->lock, flags);
> > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> >  }
> 
> If this patch is true, doesn't the spinlock the pointer is pointing out
> still get deleted?
> 
> Yes you save a pointer off, but it looks like the problem is still
> present.
> 
> Or am I missing something?
> 

The lock pointer in struct command points to a spinlock outside the
structure that doesn't get deleted.

max


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer
  2006-02-07 17:29   ` Max Asbock
@ 2006-02-07 17:44     ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2006-02-07 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Max Asbock; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 09:29:17AM -0800, Max Asbock wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 22:02, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:26:38PM -0800, Max Asbock wrote:
> > > ibmasm driver:
> > > Fix the command_put() function which uses a pointer for a spinlock that
> > > can be freed before dereferencing it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Max Asbock masbock@us.ibm.com
> > > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > diff -burpN linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h
> > > --- linux-2.6.16-rc1/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-01 11:50:01.000000000 -0800
> > > +++ linux-2.6.16-rc1.ibmasm/drivers/misc/ibmasm/ibmasm.h	2006-02-03 13:57:42.000000000 -0800
> > > @@ -101,10 +101,11 @@ struct command {
> > >  static inline void command_put(struct command *cmd)
> > >  {
> > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > > +	spinlock_t *lock = cmd->lock;
> > >  
> > > -	spin_lock_irqsave(cmd->lock, flags);
> > > +	spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
> > >          kobject_put(&cmd->kobj);
> > > -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(cmd->lock, flags);
> > > +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
> > >  }
> > 
> > If this patch is true, doesn't the spinlock the pointer is pointing out
> > still get deleted?
> > 
> > Yes you save a pointer off, but it looks like the problem is still
> > present.
> > 
> > Or am I missing something?
> > 
> 
> The lock pointer in struct command points to a spinlock outside the
> structure that doesn't get deleted.

Ok, that's what I was missing, nevermind then :)

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-07 17:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-03 22:26 [PATCH] ibmasm driver: don't use previously freed pointer Max Asbock
2006-02-04  6:02 ` Greg KH
2006-02-07 17:29   ` Max Asbock
2006-02-07 17:44     ` Greg KH

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).