linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.29-rc6-2450cf in scsi_lib.c (was: Large amount of scsi-sgpool)objects
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:56:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1236207389.21486.19.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0903042232270.29264@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 22:45 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> Instrumented the code and the result of the failing request is
> below. Looks like the function which sets up the request gets
> nr_phys_segments wrong by one. 
> 
> If you need further trace data feel free to ask.

OK, the mapping all checks out correctly ... there must be something
wrong with the way we count before mapping.

If you're tracing everything, could you add these static prints to the
trace ... they'll trigger a lot, but capturing how they applied to the
failing request might tell us why the count is wrong.

Thanks,

James

---

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index a104593..a529cba 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -127,21 +127,29 @@ static int blk_phys_contig_segment(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
 		return 0;
 
 	if (bio->bi_seg_back_size + nxt->bi_seg_front_size >
-	    q->max_segment_size)
+	    q->max_segment_size) {
+		printk("Refusing contig merge, over segment size\n");
 		return 0;
+	}
 
-	if (!bio_has_data(bio))
+	if (!bio_has_data(bio)) {
+		printk("Allowing contig merge, bio has no data\n");
 		return 1;
+	}
 
-	if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(__BVEC_END(bio), __BVEC_START(nxt)))
+	if (!BIOVEC_PHYS_MERGEABLE(__BVEC_END(bio), __BVEC_START(nxt))) {
+		printk("Refusing contig merge, bio not phys mergeable\n");
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * bio and nxt are contiguous in memory; check if the queue allows
 	 * these two to be merged into one
 	 */
-	if (BIO_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bio, nxt))
+	if (BIO_SEG_BOUNDARY(q, bio, nxt)) {
+		printk("Allowing contig merge, not across segment boundary\n");
 		return 1;
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -325,6 +333,12 @@ static int ll_merge_requests_fn(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req,
 	if ((req->nr_sectors + next->nr_sectors) > q->max_sectors)
 		return 0;
 
+	printk("Merging end %lx (segs %d) with beginning %lx (segs %d)\n",
+	       bvec_to_phys(__BVEC_END(req->biotail)), req->nr_phys_segments,
+	       bvec_to_phys(__BVEC_START(next->bio)), next->nr_phys_segments);
+	printk("Front size is %d, back size is %d\n",
+	       next->bio->bi_seg_front_size, req->biotail->bi_seg_back_size);
+
 	total_phys_segments = req->nr_phys_segments + next->nr_phys_segments;
 	if (blk_phys_contig_segment(q, req->biotail, next->bio)) {
 		if (req->nr_phys_segments == 1)



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-03  1:28 Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-03  9:31 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-03 15:21   ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 16:08     ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-03 16:24       ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-03-03 17:59         ` Alan Stern
2009-03-03 20:56           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 21:06             ` Alan Stern
2009-03-03 16:25       ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 17:19         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-03 22:07           ` [BUG] 2.6.29-rc6-2450cf in scsi_lib.c (was: Large amount of scsi-sgpool)objects Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-03 22:22             ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-03-03 23:07               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-03 22:26             ` James Bottomley
2009-03-04  2:01               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-04 18:55                 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-04 21:45                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-04 22:56                   ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-03-05  0:13                     ` James Bottomley
2009-03-05  8:36                     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05  8:39                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05  9:29                         ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05 10:09                           ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-05 10:14                             ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-05 10:27                               ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05 10:30                                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-05 10:41                                   ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05 11:10                                     ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-05 11:40                                       ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-03-05 10:41                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 11:05                                     ` Jens Axboe
2009-03-05 11:07                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 12:09                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-05 23:16                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-05 19:32                                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-05 10:15                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 19:22         ` Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 21:25           ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 21:44             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 22:39               ` James Bottomley
2009-03-03 23:03                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-03 23:32                   ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-03 23:48                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04  6:39                       ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-04  7:12                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-04  7:50                           ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-04  8:00                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-04  9:06                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-04 11:12                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 11:28                                 ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-04 11:47                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 12:02                                     ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-04 11:24                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04 19:11                               ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-04 20:09                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-04  0:01                   ` James Bottomley
2009-03-04  0:39                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-04  0:30                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-04  0:47                   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1236207389.21486.19.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).