Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / devfreq: tegra: add devfreq driver for Tegra Activity Monitor

Re: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] PM / devfreq: tegra: add devfreq driver for Tegra Activity Monitor

[MyungJoo Ham]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 1485 bytes --]

> On 25 November 2014 at 08:07, MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> The ACTMON block can monitor several counters, providing averaging and firing
> >> interrupts based on watermarking configuration. This implementation monitors
> >> the MCALL and MCCPU counters to choose an appropriate frequency for the
> >> external memory clock.
> >>
> >> This patch is based on work by Alex Frid <afrid@nvidia.com> and Mikko
> >> Perttunen <mikko.perttunen@kapsi.fi>.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
> >
> > How are you going to integrate other two patches?
> 
> I think they should go through the Tegra tree.
> 
> > May I just go ahead with this patch only?
> 
> Yes, I think that would be fine as the other patches aren't actual
> build or runtime dependencies. This driver shouldn't cause problems
> either if it's ran without the EMC and CPUFreq patches (though won't
> be fully functional, of course).

Ok, then, as long as the other two patches (for DT support) get
ACKed (seems fairly straightforward as well) or Signed-off by
corresponding tree maintainers, I feel fine to
send this patch along with the next pull request.

Thank you.

Cheers,
MyungJoo

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tomeu
> 
> > Cheers,
> > MyungJoo.
> >
> 
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥