linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Peterson <cpeterso@cpeterso.com>
Subject: Re: IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question...
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 12:51:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1239220294.31467.55.camel@calx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904071744.17727.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>

On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 17:44 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> On Tue 7 Apr 2009 10:57, Matt Mackall pondered:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 07:16 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > > On Mon 6 Apr 2009 15:01, Matt Mackall pondered:
> > > > On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 14:30 -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> > > > > We have lots of embedded headless systems (no keyboard/mouse, no
> > > > > soundcard, no video) systems with *no* sources of entropy - and
> > > > > people using SSL. 
> > > > 
> > > > I'd rather add a random_sample_network call somewhere reasonably
> > > > central in the network stack. Then we can use the knowledge that the
> > > > sample is network-connected in the random core to decide how to 
> > > > measure its entropy. The trouble with IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM is that 
> > > > many of its users are technically bogus as entropy sources in the
> > > > current model. 
> > > 
> > > OK - that makes more sense.
> > > 
> > > Does that mean we also shouldn't be using IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM on
> > > interrupt sources in subsystems which already have add_xxx_randomness()
> > > in them? (block devices, and input devices?)
> > > 
> > > block/blk-core.c -> blk_end_io() -> add_disk_randomness()
> > > drivers/input/input.c -> input_event() -> add_input_randomness()
> > > 
> > >  drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c, line 639
> > > 
> > >  drivers/input/touchscreen/wm97xx-core.c, line 374
> > >  drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c, line 145
> > >  drivers/input/keyboard/bf54x-keys.c, line 255
> > >  drivers/input/serio/hp_sdc.c, line 881
> >
> > Yes. The flag needs to be taken out and shot. 
> 
> In general or just for input and block devices?
> 
> There are still some in others:
> 
> arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-palmz71.c
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/magician.c
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmtx.c
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/palmz72.c
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/trizeps4.c
> arch/sparc/kernel/ldc.c
> arch/um/drivers/line.c
> arch/um/drivers/mconsole_kern.c
> arch/um/drivers/port_kern.c
> arch/um/drivers/xterm_kern.c
> arch/um/kernel/sigio.c
> arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu_init.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pmcmsp.c
> drivers/mfd/tps65010.c
> drivers/power/pda_power.c
> drivers/serial/bfin_sport_uart.c
> drivers/serial/mpc52xx_uart.c
> drivers/serial/uartlite.c
> drivers/staging/comedi/interrupt.h
> drivers/usb/gadget/goku_udc.c
> drivers/usb/gadget/omap_udc.c
> drivers/usb/gadget/pxa25x_udc.c
> drivers/usb/otg/gpio_vbus.c
> drivers/usb/otg/isp1301_omap.c
> 
> > Everything going into the 
> > RNG should be made to go through an add_*_randomness interface only.
> > Preferably not at a per-driver level.
> 
> Is that "Everything in general, with a few exceptions", or "__Everything__"?
> 
> If it is the latter I'll remove the ones that I'm responsible for, and send 
> Sam something for checkpatch.pl to warn if this is used in the future.

Everything. We want every input point to better document the type of
entropy source.

-- 
http://selenic.com : development and support for Mercurial and Linux



  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-09  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-06 18:30 IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM question Robin Getz
2009-04-06 18:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-06 18:44   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-06 18:49     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07  8:27       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-06 19:22   ` Robin Getz
2009-04-06 19:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-06 19:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-04-06 22:09   ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2009-04-06 23:35     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07 21:58       ` Robin Getz
2009-04-07 22:25         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07  0:16     ` Matt Mackall
2009-04-07  0:30       ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07 11:16   ` Robin Getz
2009-04-07 14:57     ` Matt Mackall
2009-04-07 21:39       ` Chris Peterson
2009-04-07 22:30         ` Robin Getz
2009-04-08 21:53           ` Gilles Espinasse
2009-04-08 23:16             ` Chris Friesen
2009-04-09  4:24               ` Robin Getz
2009-04-07 21:44       ` Robin Getz
2009-04-08 19:51         ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2009-04-09 13:54           ` Robin Getz
2009-04-09 17:00             ` Matt Mackall
2009-04-10  0:41               ` Robin Getz
2009-04-10  1:29               ` Chris Peterson
2009-04-10  2:27                 ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1239220294.31467.55.camel@calx \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=cpeterso@cpeterso.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).