Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree

["Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 12:08 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the slave-dma tree got a conflict in
> drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c (called drivers/spi/amba-pl022.c in the sleav-dma
> tree) between commit 083be3f05371 ("spi/pl022: initialize burstsize from
> FIFO trigger level") from Linus' tree and commit 001b0585ff16 ("Improve
> slave/cyclic DMA engine documentation") from the slave-dma tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) anc acn carry the fix as necessary.

The correct fix would be:

diff --cc drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
index eba88c7,99e7880..0000000
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-pl022.c
@@@ -910,11 -908,11 +910,9 @@@ static int configure_dma(struct pl022 *
  {
        struct dma_slave_config rx_conf = {
                .src_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
+		.direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
        };
        struct dma_slave_config tx_conf = {
                .dst_addr = SSP_DR(pl022->phybase),
                .direction = DMA_TO_DEVICE,
 -              .dst_maxburst = pl022->vendor->fifodepth >> 1,
        };
        unsigned int pages;
        int ret;

For now the direction flags remains to be set and checked is in both
tree so should not cause conflict.
I will rebase my tree tonight to 3.0, that should resolve conflict as
well

-- 
~Vinod