linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
To: Peng Tao <bergwolf@gmail.com>
Cc: tao.peng@emc.com, skinsbursky@parallels.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, xemul@parallels.com, neilb@suse.de,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jbottomley@parallels.com, bfields@fieldses.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:40:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1322584830.4174.16.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+a=Yy6kJe0NemSiRwM+t8gz5-UF5fOdwdS2so+q=nSYjBx--w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 23:30 +0800, Peng Tao wrote: 
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Trond Myklebust
> <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 23:10 +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Myklebust, Trond
> >> <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> wrote:
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: tao.peng@emc.com [mailto:tao.peng@emc.com]
> >> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:40 AM
> >> >> To: skinsbursky@parallels.com
> >> >> Cc: Myklebust, Trond; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; xemul@parallels.com;
> >> >> neilb@suse.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> >> >> jbottomley@parallels.com; bfields@fieldses.org; davem@davemloft.net;
> >> >> devel@openvz.org
> >> >> Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> >> from blocklayout routines
> >> >>
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbursky@parallels.com]
> >> >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:19 PM
> >> >> > To: Peng, Tao
> >> >> > Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com; linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; Pavel
> >> >> > Emelianov; neilb@suse.de; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> >> >> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; James Bottomley; bfields@fieldses.org;
> >> >> > davem@davemloft.net; devel@openvz.org
> >> >> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> >> > from blocklayout routines
> >> >> >
> >> >> > 29.11.2011 16:00, tao.peng@emc.com пишет:
> >> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > >> From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
> >> >> > >> [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> >> >> > Stanislav
> >> >> > >> Kinsbursky
> >> >> > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:11 PM
> >> >> > >> To: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
> >> >> > >> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org; xemul@parallels.com; neilb@suse.de;
> >> >> > >> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> >> >> > >> jbottomley@parallels.com; bfields@fieldses.org;
> >> >> > >> davem@davemloft.net; devel@openvz.org
> >> >> > >> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference
> >> >> > >> from blocklayout routines
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> This is a cleanup patch. We don't need this reference anymore,
> >> >> > >> because blocklayout pipes dentries now creates and destroys in
> >> >> > >> per-net operations and on PipeFS mount/umount notification.
> >> >> > >> Note that nfs4blocklayout_register_net() now returns 0 instead of
> >> >> > >> -ENOENT in case of PipeFS superblock absence. This is ok, because
> >> >> > >> blocklayout pipe dentry will be created on PipeFS mount event.
> >> >> > > When is the "pipefs mount event" going to happen? When inserting
> >> >> > > kernel modules or when user issues
> >> >> > mount command?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > When user issues mount command.
> >> >> > Kernel mounts of PipeFS has been removed with all these patch sets
> >> >> > I've sent already.
> >> >> Then it is going to break blocklayout user space program blkmapd, which is
> >> >> stared before mounting any file system and it tries to open the pipe file
> >> >> when started.
> >> >
> >> > Why on earth is blkmapd doing this instead of listening for file creation notifications like the other rpc_pipefs daemons do?
> >> Not sure how the original implementer chose this but I think it is
> >> likely because we do not expect the pipe file to be created or deleted
> >> dynamically.
> >
> > Unless blkmapd can pin the sunrpc module (which it shouldn't be able to)
> > then that assumption would be wrong. Please look into fixing blkmapd...
> Sorry, I don't quite get it. Do you mean sunrpc module may be removed
> while nfs/blocklayout modules are still in use? Please explain it a
> bit. Thanks.

I mean that I'm perfectly entitled to do

'modprobe -r blocklayoutdriver'

and when I do that, then I expect blkmapd to close the rpc pipe and wait
for a new one to be created just like rpc.idmapd and rpc.gssd do when I
remove the nfs and sunrpc modules.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
www.netapp.com


  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-29 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-29 10:10 [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29  9:17 ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 1/5] NFS: handle blocklayout pipe PipeFS dentry by network namespace aware routines Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 2/5] NFS: blocklayout pipe creation per network namespace context introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/5] NFS: blocklayout PipeFS notifier introduced Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/5] NFS: remove RPC PipeFS mount point reference from blocklayout routines Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 12:00   ` tao.peng
2011-11-29 12:19     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 12:40       ` tao.peng
2011-11-29 13:13         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-11-29 15:05           ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 13:35         ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-11-29 15:10           ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 15:18             ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-29 15:30               ` Peng Tao
2011-11-29 16:40                 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2011-11-29 16:42                   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-29 17:19                     ` Trond Myklebust
2011-11-29 17:27                       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-11-29 17:30                       ` Peng Tao
2012-05-28 11:43                         ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-11-29 10:10 ` [PATCH 5/5] SUNRPC: kernel PipeFS mount point creation routines removed Stanislav Kinsbursky
2011-12-30 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] NFS: create blocklayout pipe per network namesapce context Trond Myklebust
2012-01-05 20:58   ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-10 12:58     ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-11 16:23       ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-11 17:23         ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-11 17:46           ` Trond Myklebust
2012-01-11 18:03             ` Stanislav Kinsbursky
2012-01-10 10:50   ` Stanislav Kinsbursky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1322584830.4174.16.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
    --to=trond.myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bergwolf@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@openvz.org \
    --cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skinsbursky@parallels.com \
    --cc=tao.peng@emc.com \
    --cc=xemul@parallels.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).